When querying image extents for raw image, qemu-nbd reports holes as
zero:
$ qemu-nbd -t -r -f raw empty-6g.raw
$ qemu-img map --output json nbd://localhost
[{ "start": 0, "length": 6442450944, "depth": 0, "zero": true, "data": true, "offset": 0}]
$ qemu-img map --output json empty-6g.raw
[{ "start": 0, "length": 6442450944, "depth": 0, "zero": true, "data": false, "offset": 0}]
Turns out that qemu-img map reports a hole based on BDRV_BLOCK_DATA, but
nbd server reports a hole based on BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED.
The NBD protocol says:
NBD_STATE_HOLE (bit 0): if set, the block represents a hole (and
future writes to that area may cause fragmentation or encounter an
NBD_ENOSPC error); if clear, the block is allocated or the server
could not otherwise determine its status.
qemu-img manual says:
whether the sectors contain actual data or not (boolean field data;
if false, the sectors are either unallocated or stored as
optimized all-zero clusters);
To me, data=false looks compatible with NBD_STATE_HOLE. From user point
of view, getting same results from qemu-nbd and qemu-img is more
important than being more correct about allocation status.
Changing nbd server to report holes using BDRV_BLOCK_DATA makes qemu-nbd
results compatible with qemu-img map:
$ qemu-img map --output json nbd://localhost
[{ "start": 0, "length": 6442450944, "depth": 0, "zero": true, "data": false, "offset": 0}]
Signed-off-by: Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210219160752.1826830-1-nsoffer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Filter the qemu-nbd server output to get rid of a direct reference
to my build directory.
Fixes: e9dce9cb
Reported-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Both NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS and structured NBD_CMD_READ will split their
reply according to bdrv_block_status() boundaries. If the block device
has a request_alignment smaller than 512, but we advertise a block
alignment of 512 to the client, then this can result in the server
reply violating client expectations by reporting a smaller region of
the export than what the client is permitted to address (although this
is less of an issue for qemu 4.0 clients, given recent client patches
to overlook our non-compliance at EOF). Since it's always better to
be strict in what we send, it is worth advertising the actual minimum
block limit rather than blindly rounding it up to 512.
Note that this patch is not foolproof - it is still possible to
provoke non-compliant server behavior using:
$ qemu-nbd --image-opts driver=blkdebug,align=512,image.driver=file,image.filename=/path/to/non-aligned-file
That is arguably a bug in the blkdebug driver (it should never pass
back block status smaller than its alignment, even if it has to make
multiple bdrv_get_status calls and determine the
least-common-denominator status among the group to return). It may
also be possible to observe issues with a backing layer with smaller
alignment than the active layer, although so far I have been unable to
write a reliable iotest for that scenario (but again, an issue like
that could be argued to be a bug in the block layer, or something
where we need a flag to bdrv_block_status() to state whether the
result must be aligned to the current layer's limits or can be
subdivided for accuracy when chasing backing files).
Anyways, as blkdebug is not normally used, and as this patch makes our
server more interoperable with qemu 3.1 clients, it is worth applying
now, even while we still work on a larger patch series for the 4.1
timeframe to have byte-accurate file lengths.
Note that the iotests output changes - for 223 and 233, we can see the
server's better granularity advertisement; and for 241, the three test
cases have the following effects:
- natural alignment: the server's smaller alignment is now advertised,
and the hole reported at EOF is now the right result; we've gotten rid
of the server's non-compliance
- forced server alignment: the server still advertises 512 bytes, but
still sends a mid-sector hole. This is still a server compliance bug,
which needs to be fixed in the block layer in a later patch; output
does not change because the client is already being tolerant of the
non-compliance
- forced client alignment: the server's smaller alignment means that
the client now sees the server's status change mid-sector without any
protocol violations, but the fact that the map shows an unaligned
mid-sector hole is evidence of the block layer problems with aligned
block status, to be fixed in a later patch
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190329042750.14704-7-eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[eblake: rebase to enhanced iotest 241 coverage]
It is desirable for 'qemu-img map' to have the same output for a file
whether it is served over file or nbd protocols. However, ever since
we implemented block status for NBD (2.12), the NBD protocol forgot to
inform the block layer that as the final layer in the chain, the
offset is valid; without an offset, the human-readable form of
qemu-img map gives up with the unhelpful:
$ nbdkit -U - data data="1" size=512 --run 'qemu-img map $nbd'
Offset Length Mapped to File
qemu-img: File contains external, encrypted or compressed clusters.
The --output=json form always works, because it is reporting the
lower-level bdrv_block_status results directly rather than trying to
filter out sparse ranges for human consumption - but now it also
shows the offset member.
With this patch, the human output changes to:
Offset Length Mapped to File
0 0x200 0 nbd+unix://?socket=/tmp/nbdkitOxeoLa/socket
This change is observable to several iotests.
Fixes: 78a33ab5
Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190329042750.14704-4-eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Add a test for the NBD client workaround in the previous patch. It's
not really feasible for an iotest to assume a specific tracing engine,
so we can't really probe trace_nbd_parse_blockstatus_compliance to see
if the server was fixed vs. whether the client just worked around the
server (other than by rearranging order between code patches and this
test). But having a successful exchange sure beats the previous state
of an error message. Since format probing can change alignment, we can
use that as an easy way to test several configurations.
Not tested yet, but worth adding to this test in future patches: an
NBD server that can advertise a non-sector-aligned size (such as
nbdkit) causes qemu as the NBD client to misbehave when it rounds the
size up and accesses beyond the advertised size. Qemu as NBD server
never advertises a non-sector-aligned size (since bdrv_getlength()
currently rounds up to sector boundaries); until qemu can act as such
a server, testing that flaw will have to rely on external binaries.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190329042750.14704-2-eblake@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[eblake: add forced-512 alignment, and nbdkit reproducer comment]
Nir Soffer
Eric Blake