memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-38-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-37-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-36-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-35-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away,
so replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion.
The later is initialized by generic code, so board only
needs to opt in to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and then map memory region provided by
MachineState::ram_memdev
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-34-imammedo@redhat.com>
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-33-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-32-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-31-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-30-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed IMX6Sabrelite
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-29-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-28-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-27-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-26-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-25-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-24-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-23-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed MCIMX7Sabre
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-22-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed MCIMX6ULEVK
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-21-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Chubb <peter.chubb@data61.csiro.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-20-imammedo@redhat.com>
If the user provided too large a RAM size, the code used to
complain and trim it to the max size. Now that RAM is allocated by
generic code, that's no longer possible, so generate an error and
exit instead.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Chubb <peter.chubb@data61.csiro.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-19-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-18-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-17-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-16-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-15-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed DigicBoardState
PS2:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-14-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
While at it, get rid of no longer needed CubieBoardState wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-13-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
- while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-12-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-11-imammedo@redhat.com>
It's supposed that SOC will check if "-m" provided
RAM size is valid by setting "ram-size" property and
then board would read back valid (possibly corrected
value) to map RAM MemoryReging with valid size.
It isn't doing so, since check is called only
indirectly from
aspeed_sdmc_reset()->asc->compute_conf()
or much later when guest writes to configuration
register.
So depending on "-m" value QEMU end-ups with a warning
and an invalid MemoryRegion size allocated and mapped.
(examples:
-M ast2500-evb -m 1M
0000000080000000-000000017ffffffe (prio 0, i/o): aspeed-ram-container
0000000080000000-00000000800fffff (prio 0, ram): ram
0000000080100000-00000000bfffffff (prio 0, i/o): max_ram
-M ast2500-evb -m 3G
0000000080000000-000000017ffffffe (prio 0, i/o): aspeed-ram-container
0000000080000000-000000013fffffff (prio 0, ram): ram
[DETECTED OVERFLOW!] 0000000140000000-00000000bfffffff (prio 0, i/o): max_ram
)
On top of that sdmc falls back and reports to guest
"default" size, it thinks machine should have.
This patch makes ram-size check actually work and
changes behavior from a warning later on during
machine reset to error_fatal at the moment SOC.ram-size
is set so user will have to fix RAM size on CLI
to start machine.
It also gets out of the way mutable ram-size logic,
so we could consolidate RAM allocation logic around
pre-allocated hostmem backend (supplied by user or
auto created by generic machine code depending on
supplied -m/mem-path/mem-prealloc options.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-10-imammedo@redhat.com>
The count of ARM cores is encoded in the board revision. Add a
helper to extract the number of cores, and use it. This will be
helpful when we add the Raspi0/1 that have a single core.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-14-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMM: tweaked commit message as suggested by Igor]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
With the exception of the ignore_memory_transaction_failures
flag set for the raspi2, both machine_class_init() methods
are now identical. Merge them to keep a unique method.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-13-f4bug@amsat.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The board revision encode the model type. Add a helper
to extract the model, and use it.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-12-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
We added a helper to extract the RAM size from the board
revision, and made board_rev a field of RaspiMachineClass.
The class_init() can now use the helper to extract from the
board revision the board-specific amount of RAM.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-11-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
raspi_machine_init() access to board_rev via RaspiMachineClass.
raspi2_init() and raspi3_init() do nothing. Call raspi_machine_init
directly.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-10-f4bug@amsat.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
We want to have a common class_init(). The only value that
matters (and changes) is the board revision.
Pass the board_rev as class_data to class_init().
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-9-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
QOM'ify RaspiMachineState. Now machines inherit of RaspiMachineClass.
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-8-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
There is no point in creating the SoC object before allocating the RAM.
Move the call to keep all the SoC-related calls together.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-7-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The board revision encode the processor type. Add a helper
to extract the type, and use it.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-6-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The board revision encode the amount of RAM. Add a helper
to extract the RAM size, and use it.
Since the amount of RAM is fixed (it is impossible to physically
modify to have more or less RAM), do not allow sizes different
than the one anounced by the manufacturer.
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-5-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The board revision encode the board version. Add a helper
to extract the version, and use it.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-4-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
We hardcode the board revision as 0xa21041 for the raspi2, and
0xa02082 for the raspi3:
166 static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine, int version)
167 {
...
194 int board_rev = version == 3 ? 0xa02082 : 0xa21041;
These revision codes are for the 2B and 3B models, see:
https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/hardware/raspberrypi/revision-codes/README.md
Correct the board description.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-3-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
When booting without device tree, the Linux kernels uses the $R1
register to determine the machine type. The list of values is
registered at [1].
There are two entries for the Raspberry Pi:
- https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/list.php?mid=3138
name: MACH_TYPE_BCM2708
value: 0xc42 (3138)
status: Active, not mainlined
date: 15 Oct 2010
- https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/list.php?mid=4828
name: MACH_TYPE_BCM2835
value: 4828
status: Active, mainlined
date: 6 Dec 2013
QEMU always used the non-mainlined type MACH_TYPE_BCM2708.
The value 0xc43 is registered to 'MX51_GGC' (processor i.MX51), and
0xc44 to 'Western Digital Sharespace NAS' (processor Marvell 88F5182).
The Raspberry Pi foundation bootloader only sets the BCM2708 machine
type, see [2] or [3]:
133 9:
134 mov r0, #0
135 ldr r1, =3138 @ BCM2708 machine id
136 ldr r2, atags @ ATAGS
137 bx r4
U-Boot only uses MACH_TYPE_BCM2708 (see [4]):
25 /*
26 * 2835 is a SKU in a series for which the 2708 is the first or primary SoC,
27 * so 2708 has historically been used rather than a dedicated 2835 ID.
28 *
29 * We don't define a machine type for bcm2709/bcm2836 since the RPi Foundation
30 * chose to use someone else's previously registered machine ID (3139, MX51_GGC)
31 * rather than obtaining a valid ID:-/
32 *
33 * For the bcm2837, hopefully a machine type is not needed, since everything
34 * is DT.
35 */
While the definition MACH_BCM2709 with value 0xc43 was introduced in
a commit described "Add 2709 platform for Raspberry Pi 2" out of the
mainline Linux kernel, it does not seem used, and the platform is
introduced with Device Tree support anyway (see [5] and [6]).
Remove the unused values (0xc43 introduced in commit 1df7d1f930
"raspi: add raspberry pi 2 machine" and 0xc44 in commit bade58166f
"raspi: Raspberry Pi 3 support"), keeping only MACH_TYPE_BCM2708.
[1] https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/
[2] https://github.com/raspberrypi/tools/blob/920c7ed2e/armstubs/armstub7.S#L135
[3] https://github.com/raspberrypi/tools/blob/49719d554/armstubs/armstub7.S#L64
[4] https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/blob/v2015.04/include/configs/rpi-common.h#L18
[5] https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commit/d9fac63adac#diff-6722037d79570df5b392a49e0e006573R526
[6] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rpi-kernel/2015-February/001268.html
Cc: Zoltán Baldaszti <bztemail@gmail.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@iki.fi>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Kshitij Soni <kshitij.soni@broadcom.com>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Andrew Baumann <Andrew.Baumann@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-2-f4bug@amsat.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Initialize EHCI controllers on AST2600 using the existing
TYPE_PLATFORM_EHCI. After this change, booting ast2600-evb
into Linux successfully instantiates a USB interface after
the necessary changes are made to its devicetree files.
ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver
ehci-platform: EHCI generic platform driver
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: EHCI Host Controller
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: irq 25, io mem 0x1e6a3000
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 5.5.0-09825-ga0802f2d0ef5-dirty ehci_hcd
usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 2 using ehci-platform
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20200207174548.9087-1-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Initialize EHCI controllers on AST2400 and AST2500 using the existing
TYPE_PLATFORM_EHCI. After this change, booting ast2500-evb into Linux
successfully instantiates a USB interface.
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: EHCI Host Controller
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: irq 21, io mem 0x1e6a3000
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002, bcdDevice= 5.05
usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1
usb usb1: Product: EHCI Host Controller
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200206183437.3979-1-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The original code defines a named object for the resource template but
then returns the resource template object itself; the resulted output
is like below:
Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
{
Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
{
WordBusNumber (ResourceProducer, MinFixed, MaxFixed, PosDecode,
0x0000, // Granularity
0x0000, // Range Minimum
0x00FF, // Range Maximum
0x0000, // Translation Offset
0x0100, // Length
,, )
......
})
Return (ResourceTemplate ()
{
WordBusNumber (ResourceProducer, MinFixed, MaxFixed, PosDecode,
0x0000, // Granularity
0x0000, // Range Minimum
0x00FF, // Range Maximum
0x0000, // Translation Offset
0x0100, // Length
,, )
......
})
}
So the named object "RBUF" is actually useless. The more natural way
is to return RBUF instead, or simply drop RBUF definition.
Choose the latter one to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200204014325.16279-7-guoheyi@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Using _UID of 0 for all PCI interrupt link devices absolutely violates
the spec. Simply increase one by one.
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200204014325.16279-6-guoheyi@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The address field in each _PRT mapping package should be constructed
with high word for device# and low word for function#, so it is wrong
to use bus_no as the high word. The existing code adds a bunch useless
entries with device #s above 31. Enumerate all possible slots
(i.e. PCI_SLOT_MAX) instead.
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200204014325.16279-5-guoheyi@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
According to ACPI spec, _ADR should be used for device on a bus that
has a standard enumeration algorithm, but not for device which is on
system bus and must be enumerated by OSPM. And it is not recommended
to contain both _HID and _ADR in a single device.
See ACPI 6.3, section 6.1, top of page 343:
A device object must contain either an _HID object or an _ADR object,
but should not contain both.
(https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_May16.pdf)
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200204014325.16279-4-guoheyi@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The sub device "RP0" under PCI0 in ACPI/DSDT does not contain any
method or property other than "_ADR", so it is safe to remove it.
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
Acked-by: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200204014325.16279-3-guoheyi@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Igor Mammedov
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Guenter Roeck
Heyi Guo
Roman Kapl