Specifying the same memory backend twice leads to an assert:
./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512M -enable-kvm -object
memory-backend-ram,size=256M,id=ram0 -numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram0
-numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=ram0
qemu-system-x86_64: /scm/qemu/memory.c:1506:
memory_region_add_subregion_common: Assertion `!subregion->container'
failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
Detect and exit with an error message instead.
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
We don't support sparse NUMA node IDs yet, so this changes QEMU to
reject configs where not all nodes are present.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
The same nodeid shouldn't appear multiple times in the command-line.
In addition to detecting command-line mistakes, this will fix a bug
where nb_numa_nodes may become larger than MAX_NODES (and cause
out-of-bounds access on the numa_info array).
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Based on "enable sparse node numbering" patch from Nishanth Aravamudan,
but without the code to actually support sparse node IDs. This just adds
the code to keep track of present/non-present nodes on the command-line,
without changing any behavior.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Rename max_numa_node to max_numa_nodeid -Eduardo]
[Initialize max_numa_nodeid to 0 -Eduardo]
[Use MAX() macro when setting max_numa_nodeid -Eduardo]
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
when memory_region_init_ram_from_file() fails
memory_region_size() will still return size that was
provided at region init time.
Instead use errp to properly detect error condition.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Add qmp command query-memdev to query for information
of memory devices
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
A new "share" property can be used with the "memory-file" backend to
map memory with MAP_SHARED instead of MAP_PRIVATE.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Right now, -mem-path will fall back to RAM-based allocation in some
cases. This should never happen with "-object memory-file", prepare
the code by adding correct error propagation.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
MST: drop \n at end of error messages
Like the previous patch did in exec.c, split memory_region_init_ram and
memory_region_init_ram_from_file, and push mem_path one step further up.
Other RAM regions than system memory will now be backed by regular RAM.
Also, boards that do not use memory_region_allocate_system_memory will
not support -mem-path anymore. This can be changed before the patches
are merged by migrating boards to use the function.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
This option provides the infrastructure for binding guest NUMA nodes
to host NUMA nodes. For example:
-object memory-ram,size=1024M,policy=bind,host-nodes=0,id=ram-node0 \
-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0,memdev=ram-node0 \
-object memory-ram,size=1024M,policy=interleave,host-nodes=1-3,id=ram-node1 \
-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=1,memdev=ram-node1
The option replaces "-numa node,mem=".
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
MST: conflict resolution
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
MST: resolve conflicts
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Add the numa_info structure to contain the numa nodes memory,
VCPUs information and the future added numa nodes host memory
policies.
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
[Fix hw/ppc/spapr.c - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
If the total number of the assigned numa nodes memory is not
equal to the assigned ram size, it will write the wrong data
to ACPI table, then the guest will ignore the wrong ACPI table
and recognize all memory to one node. It's buggy, we should
check it to ensure that we write the right data to ACPI table.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
MST: error message reworded
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
MST: comment tweaks
