So we don't need to set anywhere else.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
[thuth: Drop changes in tests/qtest/fuzz/ since the fuzzers still need this]
Message-Id: <20220902165126.1482-2-quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Since commit a2ce7dbd91 ("meson: convert tests/qtest to meson"),
libqtest.h is under libqos/ directory, while libqtest.c is still in
qtest/. Move back to its original location to avoid mixing with libqos/.
Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
The fuzz tests are currently scheduled for all targets, but their setup
code limits the run to "i386", so that these tests always show "SKIP"
on other targets. Move it to the right x86 list in meson.build, then
we can drop the architecture check during runtime, too.
Message-Id: <20220414130127.719528-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Include the qtest reproducer provided by Alexander Bulekov
in https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/451. Without
the previous commit, we get:
$ make check-qtest-i386
...
Running test qtest-i386/fuzz-sdcard-test
==447470==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x61500002a080 at pc 0x564c71766d48 bp 0x7ffc126c62b0 sp 0x7ffc126c62a8
READ of size 1 at 0x61500002a080 thread T0
#0 0x564c71766d47 in sdhci_read_dataport hw/sd/sdhci.c:474:18
#1 0x564c7175f139 in sdhci_read hw/sd/sdhci.c:1022:19
#2 0x564c721b937b in memory_region_read_accessor softmmu/memory.c:440:11
#3 0x564c72171e51 in access_with_adjusted_size softmmu/memory.c:554:18
#4 0x564c7216f47c in memory_region_dispatch_read1 softmmu/memory.c:1424:16
#5 0x564c7216ebb9 in memory_region_dispatch_read softmmu/memory.c:1452:9
#6 0x564c7212db5d in flatview_read_continue softmmu/physmem.c:2879:23
#7 0x564c7212f958 in flatview_read softmmu/physmem.c:2921:12
#8 0x564c7212f418 in address_space_read_full softmmu/physmem.c:2934:18
#9 0x564c721305a9 in address_space_rw softmmu/physmem.c:2962:16
#10 0x564c7175a392 in dma_memory_rw_relaxed include/sysemu/dma.h:89:12
#11 0x564c7175a0ea in dma_memory_rw include/sysemu/dma.h:132:12
#12 0x564c71759684 in dma_memory_read include/sysemu/dma.h:152:12
#13 0x564c7175518c in sdhci_do_adma hw/sd/sdhci.c:823:27
#14 0x564c7174bf69 in sdhci_data_transfer hw/sd/sdhci.c:935:13
#15 0x564c7176aaa7 in sdhci_send_command hw/sd/sdhci.c:376:9
#16 0x564c717629ee in sdhci_write hw/sd/sdhci.c:1212:9
#17 0x564c72172513 in memory_region_write_accessor softmmu/memory.c:492:5
#18 0x564c72171e51 in access_with_adjusted_size softmmu/memory.c:554:18
#19 0x564c72170766 in memory_region_dispatch_write softmmu/memory.c:1504:16
#20 0x564c721419ee in flatview_write_continue softmmu/physmem.c:2812:23
#21 0x564c721301eb in flatview_write softmmu/physmem.c:2854:12
#22 0x564c7212fca8 in address_space_write softmmu/physmem.c:2950:18
#23 0x564c721d9a53 in qtest_process_command softmmu/qtest.c:727:9
0x61500002a080 is located 0 bytes to the right of 512-byte region [0x615000029e80,0x61500002a080)
allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x564c708e1737 in __interceptor_calloc (qemu-system-i386+0x1e6a737)
#1 0x7ff05567b5e0 in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5a5e0)
#2 0x564c71774adb in sdhci_pci_realize hw/sd/sdhci-pci.c:36:5
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow hw/sd/sdhci.c:474:18 in sdhci_read_dataport
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
0x0c2a7fffd3c0: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
0x0c2a7fffd3d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x0c2a7fffd3e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x0c2a7fffd3f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x0c2a7fffd400: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
=>0x0c2a7fffd410:[fa]fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
0x0c2a7fffd420: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x0c2a7fffd430: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x0c2a7fffd440: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x0c2a7fffd450: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x0c2a7fffd460: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
Addressable: 00
Heap left redzone: fa
Freed heap region: fd
==447470==ABORTING
Broken pipe
ERROR qtest-i386/fuzz-sdcard-test - too few tests run (expected 3, got 2)
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211215205656.488940-4-philmd@redhat.com>
[thuth: Replaced "-m 4G" with "-m 512M"]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
OSS-Fuzz found sending illegal addresses when querying the write
protection bits triggers the assertion added in commit 84816fb63e
("hw/sd/sdcard: Assert if accessing an illegal group"):
qemu-fuzz-i386-target-generic-fuzz-sdhci-v3: ../hw/sd/sd.c:824: uint32_t sd_wpbits(SDState *, uint64_t):
Assertion `wpnum < sd->wpgrps_size' failed.
#3 0x7f62a8b22c91 in __assert_fail
#4 0x5569adcec405 in sd_wpbits hw/sd/sd.c:824:9
#5 0x5569adce5f6d in sd_normal_command hw/sd/sd.c:1389:38
#6 0x5569adce3870 in sd_do_command hw/sd/sd.c:1737:17
#7 0x5569adcf1566 in sdbus_do_command hw/sd/core.c💯16
#8 0x5569adcfc192 in sdhci_send_command hw/sd/sdhci.c:337:12
#9 0x5569adcfa3a3 in sdhci_write hw/sd/sdhci.c:1186:9
#10 0x5569adfb3447 in memory_region_write_accessor softmmu/memory.c:492:5
It is legal for the CMD30 to query for out-of-range addresses.
Such invalid addresses are simply ignored in the response (write
protection bits set to 0).
In commit 84816fb63e ("hw/sd/sdcard: Assert if accessing an illegal
group") we misplaced the assertion *before* we test the address is
in range. Move it *after*.
Include the qtest reproducer provided by Alexander Bulekov:
$ make check-qtest-i386
...
Running test qtest-i386/fuzz-sdcard-test
qemu-system-i386: ../hw/sd/sd.c:824: sd_wpbits: Assertion `wpnum < sd->wpgrps_size' failed.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Reported-by: OSS-Fuzz (Issue 29225)
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Fixes: 84816fb63e ("hw/sd/sdcard: Assert if accessing an illegal group")
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/495
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20210802235524.3417739-3-f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
OSS-Fuzz found sending illegal addresses when querying the write
protection bits triggers an assertion:
qemu-fuzz-i386: hw/sd/sd.c:824: uint32_t sd_wpbits(SDState *, uint64_t): Assertion `wpnum < sd->wpgrps_size' failed.
==11578== ERROR: libFuzzer: deadly signal
#8 0x7ffff628e091 in __assert_fail
#9 0x5555588f1a3c in sd_wpbits hw/sd/sd.c:824:9
#10 0x5555588dd271 in sd_normal_command hw/sd/sd.c:1383:38
#11 0x5555588d777c in sd_do_command hw/sd/sd.c
#12 0x555558cb25a0 in sdbus_do_command hw/sd/core.c💯16
#13 0x555558e02a9a in sdhci_send_command hw/sd/sdhci.c:337:12
#14 0x555558dffa46 in sdhci_write hw/sd/sdhci.c:1187:9
#15 0x5555598b9d76 in memory_region_write_accessor softmmu/memory.c:489:5
Similarly to commit 8573378e62 ("hw/sd: fix out-of-bounds check
for multi block reads"), check the address range before sending
the status of the write protection bits.
Include the qtest reproducer provided by Alexander Bulekov:
$ make check-qtest-i386
...
Running test qtest-i386/fuzz-sdcard-test
qemu-system-i386: ../hw/sd/sd.c:824: sd_wpbits: Assertion `wpnum < sd->wpgrps_size' failed.
Reported-by: OSS-Fuzz (Issue 29225)
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/450
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Message-Id: <20210702155900.148665-4-f4bug@amsat.org>
