there are 2 use cases to deal with:
1: fixed CPU models per board/soc
2: boards with user configurable cpu_model and fallback to
default cpu_model if user hasn't specified one explicitly
For the 1st
drop intermediate cpu_model parsing and use const cpu type
directly, which replaces:
typename = object_class_get_name(
cpu_class_by_name(TYPE_ARM_CPU, cpu_model))
object_new(typename)
with
object_new(FOO_CPU_TYPE_NAME)
or
cpu_generic_init(BASE_CPU_TYPE, "my cpu model")
with
cpu_create(FOO_CPU_TYPE_NAME)
as result 1st use case doesn't have to invoke not necessary
translation and not needed code is removed.
For the 2nd
1: set default cpu type with MachineClass::default_cpu_type and
2: use generic cpu_model parsing that done before machine_init()
is run and:
2.1: drop custom cpu_model parsing where pattern is:
typename = object_class_get_name(
cpu_class_by_name(TYPE_ARM_CPU, cpu_model))
[parse_features(typename, cpu_model, &err) ]
2.2: or replace cpu_generic_init() which does what
2.1 does + create_cpu(typename) with just
create_cpu(machine->cpu_type)
as result cpu_name -> cpu_type translation is done using
generic machine code one including parsing optional features
if supported/present (removes a bunch of duplicated cpu_model
parsing code) and default cpu type is defined in an uniform way
within machine_class_init callbacks instead of adhoc places
in boadr's machine_init code.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1505318697-77161-6-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Fix an error that meant we were wiring every UART's overflow
interrupts into the same inputs 0 and 1 of the OR gate,
rather than giving each its own input.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 1505232834-20890-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
A cut-and-paste error meant that instead of setting the
qdev parent bus for the SCC device we were setting it
twice for the ARMv7M container device. Fix this bug.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1500634509-28011-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The MPS2 FPGA images support ethernet via a LAN9220. We use
QEMU's LAN9118 model, which is software compatible except
that it is missing the checksum-offload feature.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1500029487-14822-9-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Add the UARTs to the MPS2 board models.
Unfortunately the details of the wiring of the interrupts through
various OR gates differ between AN511 and AN385 so this can't
be purely a data-driven difference.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
Message-id: 1500029487-14822-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Model the ARM MPS2/MPS2+ FPGA based development board.
The MPS2 and MPS2+ dev boards are FPGA based (the 2+ has a bigger
FPGA but is otherwise the same as the 2). Since the CPU itself
and most of the devices are in the FPGA, the details of the board
as seen by the guest depend significantly on the FPGA image.
We model the following FPGA images:
"mps2_an385" -- Cortex-M3 as documented in ARM Application Note AN385
"mps2_an511" -- Cortex-M3 'DesignStart' as documented in AN511
They are fairly similar but differ in the details for some
peripherals.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1500029487-14822-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
