We use section "Returns" for documenting both success and error
response of commands.
I intend to generate better command success response documentation.
Easier when "Returns" documents just he success response.
Create new section tag "Errors". The next two commits will move error
response documentation from "Returns" sections to "Errors" sections.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240227113921.236097-4-armbru@redhat.com>
Change "'Returns:' is only valid for commands" to "'Returns' section
is only valid for commands".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240227113921.236097-3-armbru@redhat.com>
QAPIDoc stores a reference to QAPIParser just to pass it to
QAPIParseError. The resulting error position depends on the state of
the parser. It happens to be the current comment line. Servicable,
but action at a distance.
The commit before previous moved most uses of QAPIParseError from
QAPIDoc to QAPIParser. There are just three left. Convert them to
QAPISemError. This involves passing info to a few methods. Then drop
the reference to QAPIParser.
The three errors lose the column number. Not really interesting here:
it's the comment line's indentation.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-17-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The parser recognizes only the first "Features:" line. Any subsequent
ones are treated as ordinary text, as visible in test case
doc-duplicate-features. Recognize "Features:" lines anywhere. A
second one is an error.
A 'Features:' line without any features is useless, but not an error.
Make it an error. This makes detecting a second "Features:" line
easier.
qapi/run-state.json actually has an instance of this since commit
fe17522d85 (qapi: Remove deprecated 'singlestep' member of
StatusInfo). Clean it up.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-16-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The parser mostly doesn't create adjacent untagged sections, and
merging the ones it does create is hardly worth the bother. I'm doing
it to avoid behavioral change in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-14-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Putting a blank line before section tags and 'Features:' is good,
existing practice. Enforce it.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-12-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
By convention, we indent the second and subsequent lines of
descriptions and tagged sections, except for examples.
Turn this into a hard rule, and apply it to examples, too.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-11-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
[Straightforward conflicts in qapi/migration.json resolved]
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt claims "A heading line must be the first
line of the documentation comment block" since commit
55ec69f8b1 (docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt: Update to new rST backend
conventions). Not true, we have code to make it work anywhere in a
free-form doc comment: commit dcdc07a97c (qapi: Make section headings
start a new doc comment block).
Make it true, for simplicity's sake.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-10-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Since the previous commit, QAPIDoc.Section.name is either
None (untagged section) or the section's tag string ('Returns',
'@name', ...). Rename it to .tag.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-9-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Improve the message for an empty tagged section from
empty doc section 'Note'
to
text required after 'Note:'
and the message for an empty argument or feature description from
empty doc section 'foo'
to
text required after '@foo:'
Improve the error position to refer to the beginning of the empty
section instead of its end.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-8-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
When something other than a command has a "Returns" section, the error
message points to the beginning of the definition comment. Point to
the "Returns" section instead.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-7-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
When documented arguments don't exist, the error message points to the
beginning of the definition comment. Point to the first bogus
argument description instead.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-6-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
A 'Features:' line without any features is useless, but not an error
now. However, a later commit will make it one, because that makes
rejecting duplicate 'Features:' easier.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-4-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
We don't actually recognize the second 'Features:' line. Instead, we
treat it as an untagged section.
If it was followed by feature description, we'd reject that like
"description of '@feat2:' follows a section". Less than clear.
To be improved shortly.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The test compares Sphinx plain-text output against a golden reference.
To work on Windows hosts, it filters out carriage returns in both
files. Unfortunately, the filter doesn't work: it creates an empty
file. Comparing empty files always succeeds.
Fix the filter, and update the golden reference to current Sphinx
output.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240216145841.2099240-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
The QAPI generator forces you to document your stuff. Except for
command arguments, event data, and members of enum and object types:
these the generator silently "documents" as "Not documented".
We can't require proper documentation there without first fixing all
the offenders. We've always had too many offenders to pull that off.
Right now, we have more than 500. Worse, we seem to fix old ones no
faster than we add new ones: in the past year, we fixed 22 ones, but
added 26 new ones.
To help arrest the backsliding, make missing documentation an error
unless the command, type, or event is in listed in new pragma
documentation-exceptions.
List all the current offenders: 117 commands and types in qapi/, and 9
in qga/.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240205074709.3613229-7-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen demands that the "second and subsequent lines
of sections other than "Example"/"Examples" should be indented".
Commit a937b6aa739q (qapi: Reformat doc comments to conform to current
conventions) missed a few instances, and messed up a few others.
Clean that up.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240205074709.3613229-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Pylint warns:
tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py:139:13: W1514: Using open without explicitly specifying an encoding (unspecified-encoding)
tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py:143:13: W1514: Using open without explicitly specifying an encoding (unspecified-encoding)
Add encoding='utf-8'.
Pylint advises:
tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py:143:13: R1732: Consider using 'with' for resource-allocating operations (consider-using-with)
Silence this by returning the value directly.
Pylint advises:
tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py:221:4: R1722: Consider using sys.exit() (consider-using-sys-exit)
tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py:226:4: R1722: Consider using sys.exit() (consider-using-sys-exit)
Sure, why not.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231025092925.1785934-1-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
with some rewording in
tests/qemu-iotests/298
tests/qtest/fuzz/generic_fuzz.c
tests/unit/test-throttle.c
as suggested by Eric.
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
The error message is bad when the section is untagged. For instance,
test case doc-interleaved-section produces "'@foobar:' can't follow
'Note' section", which is okay, but if we drop the "Note:" tag, we get
"'@foobar:' can't follow 'None' section, which is bad.
Change the error message to "description of '@foobar:' follows a
section".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510141637.3685080-1-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
[Conflict with commit 3e32dca3f0 resolved]
The QAPI schema doc comment language provides special syntax for
command and event arguments, struct and union members, alternate
branches, enumeration values, and features: descriptions starting with
"@name:".
By convention, we format them like this:
# @name: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit,
# sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore
# magna aliqua.
Okay for names as short as "name", but we have much longer ones. Their
description gets squeezed against the right margin, like this:
# @dirty-sync-missed-zero-copy: Number of times dirty RAM synchronization could
# not avoid copying dirty pages. This is between
# 0 and @dirty-sync-count * @multifd-channels.
# (since 7.1)
The description text is effectively just 50 characters wide. Easy
enough to read, but can be cumbersome to write.
The awkward squeeze against the right margin makes people go beyond it,
which produces two undesirables: arguments about style, and descriptions
that are unnecessarily hard to read, like this one:
# @postcopy-vcpu-blocktime: list of the postcopy blocktime per vCPU. This is
# only present when the postcopy-blocktime migration capability
# is enabled. (Since 3.0)
We could instead format it like
# @postcopy-vcpu-blocktime:
# list of the postcopy blocktime per vCPU. This is only present
# when the postcopy-blocktime migration capability is
# enabled. (Since 3.0)
or, since the commit before previous, like
# @postcopy-vcpu-blocktime:
# list of the postcopy blocktime per vCPU. This is only present
# when the postcopy-blocktime migration capability is
# enabled. (Since 3.0)
However, I'd rather have
# @postcopy-vcpu-blocktime: list of the postcopy blocktime per vCPU.
# This is only present when the postcopy-blocktime migration
# capability is enabled. (Since 3.0)
because this is how rST field and option lists work.
To get this, we need to let the first non-blank line after the
"@name:" line determine expected indentation.
This fills up the indentation pitfall mentioned in
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.rst. A related pitfall still exists. Update
the text to show it.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230428105429.1687850-14-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
[Work around lack of walrus operator in Python 3.7 and older]
When an argument's description starts on the line after the "#arg: "
line, indentation is stripped only from the description's first line,
as demonstrated by the previous commit. Moreover, subsequent lines
with less indentation are not rejected.
Make the first line's indentation the expected indentation for the
remainder of the description. This fixes indentation stripping, and
also requires at least that much indentation.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230428105429.1687850-12-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Improve the comments to better describe what they test.
Cover argument description starting on a new line indented. This
style isn't documented in docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.rst. qapi-gen.py
accepts it, but messes up indentation: it's stripped from the first
line, not subsequent ones. The next commit will fix this.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230428105429.1687850-11-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
The QAPI generator doesn't reject undocumented members and
features (yet). doc-good.json covers this, with clear "is
undocumented" notes to signal intent.
Except for @Variant1 member @var1, where it's "(but no @var: line)".
Less clear. Replace by "@var1 is undocumented".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230428105429.1687850-10-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
This extends the QAPI schema validation to permit unions inside unions,
provided the checks for clashing fields pass.
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230420102619.348173-4-berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
It is possible to pass --update to tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py
to make it update the output files on error. This is inconvenient
to achieve though when test-qapi.py is run indirectly by make/meson.
Instead simply allow for an env variable to be set:
$ QAPI_TEST_UPDATE= make check-qapi-schema
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230420102619.348173-2-berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
The C code generator fails to honor 'if' conditions of command and
event arguments.
For instance, tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json has
{ 'event': 'TEST_IF_EVENT',
'data': { 'foo': 'TestIfStruct',
'bar': { 'type': ['str'], 'if': 'TEST_IF_EVT_ARG' } },
'if': { 'all': ['TEST_IF_EVT', 'TEST_IF_STRUCT'] } }
Generated tests/test-qapi-events.h fails to honor the TEST_IF_EVT_ARG
condition:
#if defined(TEST_IF_EVT) && defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT)
void qapi_event_send_test_if_event(TestIfStruct *foo, strList *bar);
#endif /* defined(TEST_IF_EVT) && defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT) */
Only uses so far are in tests/.
We could fix the generator to emit something like
#if defined(TEST_IF_EVT) && defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT)
void qapi_event_send_test_if_event(TestIfStruct *foo
#if defined(TEST_IF_EVT_ARG)
, strList *bar
#endif
);
#endif /* defined(TEST_IF_EVT) && defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT) */
Ugly. Calls become similarly ugly. Not worth fixing.
Conditional arguments work fine with 'boxed': true, simply because
complex types with conditional members work fine. Not worth breaking.
Reject conditional arguments unless boxed.
Move the tests cases covering unboxed conditional arguments out of
tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json. Cover boxed conditional
arguments there instead.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230316071325.492471-15-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230316071325.492471-13-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Union TestIfUnion is conditional on macros TEST_IF_UNION and
TEST_IF_STRUCT. It uses TestIfEnum, which is conditional on macro
TEST_IF_ENUM. If TEST_IF_UNION and TEST_IF_STRUCT are defined, but
TEST_IF_ENUM isn't, the generated code won't compile.
Command test-if-cmd is conditional an macros TEST_IF_CMD and
TEST_IF_STRUCT, and uses TestIfEnum. Similar issue.
Event TEST_IF_EVENT is conditional an macros TEST_IF_EVT and
TEST_IF_STRUCT, and uses TestIfEnum. Similar issue.
Replace the uses of TestIfEnum in the latter two by str.
TestIfUnion is now TestIfEnum's only user. Change TestIfEnum's
condition to TEST_IF_UNION.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230316071325.492471-12-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message corrected]
A union's 'discriminator' must name one of the common members.
QAPISchemaVariants.check() looks it up by its c_name(), then checks
the name matches exactly (because c_name() is not injective).
Tests union-base-empty and union-invalid-discriminator both cover the
case where lookup fails. Repurpose the latter to cover the case where
it succeeds and the name check fails.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230316071325.492471-10-armbru@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message typo fixed]
A struct's 'data' must be a JSON object defining the struct's members.
The QAPI code generator incorrectly accepts a JSON string instead, and
then crashes in QAPISchema._make_members() called from
._def_struct_type().
Fix to reject it: factor check_type_implicit() out of
check_type_name_or_implicit(), and switch check_struct() to use it
instead. Also add a test case.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230316071325.492471-9-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
[More detailed commit message]
We incorrectly report "FOO should be a type name" when it could also
be an array. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230316071325.492471-8-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
We reject array types in certain places with "cannot be an array".
Deleting this check improves the error message to "should be a type
name" or "should be an object or type name", depending on context, so
do that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230316071325.492471-6-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220321164243.200569-4-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Dead code dropped in test_visitor_in_alternate_list()]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Check that conflicts among array alternates are detected correctly.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220321164243.200569-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Expected test output alternate-conflict-lists.json corrected]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Detect array types as alternate branches, and turn the JSON list into
a QAPISchemaArrayType. Array types in an alternate are represented with
QTYPE_QLIST in the type field.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220321164243.200569-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Module dependencies is now handled by depfile.py.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
By convention, names starting with "x-" are experimental. The parts
of external interfaces so named may be withdrawn or changed
incompatibly in future releases.
The naming convention makes unstable interfaces easy to recognize.
Promoting something from experimental to stable involves a name
change. Client code needs to be updated. Occasionally bothersome.
Worse, the convention is not universally observed:
* QOM type "input-barrier" has properties "x-origin", "y-origin".
Looks accidental, but it's ABI since 4.2.
* QOM types "memory-backend-file", "memory-backend-memfd",
"memory-backend-ram", and "memory-backend-epc" have a property
"x-use-canonical-path-for-ramblock-id" that is documented to be
stable despite its name.
We could document these exceptions, but documentation helps only
humans. We want to recognize "unstable" in code, like "deprecated".
So support recognizing it the same way: introduce new special feature
flag "unstable". It will be treated specially by the QAPI generator,
like the existing feature flag "deprecated", and unlike regular
feature flags.
This commit updates documentation and prepares tests. The next commit
updates the QAPI schema. The remaining patches update the QAPI
generator and wire up -compat policy checking.
Management applications can then use query-qmp-schema and -compat to
manage or guard against use of unstable interfaces the same way as for
deprecated interfaces.
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt no longer mandates the naming convention.
Using it anyway might help writers of programs that aren't
full-fledged management applications. Not using it can save us
bothersome renames. We'll see how that shakes out.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211028102520.747396-2-armbru@redhat.com>
This is quite similar to commit 84ab008687 "qapi: Add feature flags to
struct members", only for enums instead of structs.
Special feature flag 'deprecated' is silently ignored there. This is
okay only because it will be implemented shortly.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211025042405.3762351-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Meson 0.58.2 does not need b_staticpic=$pie anymore, and has
stabilized the keyval module. Remove the workaround and use a few
replacements for features deprecated in the 0.57.0 release cycle.
One feature that we would like to use is passing dependencies to
summary. However, that was broken in 0.59.0 and 0.59.1. Therefore,
use the embedded Meson if the host has anything older than 0.59.2,
but allow --meson= to use 0.58.2.
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
True, we do not check the validity of this symbol -- but we don't check
the validity of definition names during parse, either -- that happens
later, during the expr check. I don't want to introduce a dependency on
expr.py:check_name_str here and introduce a cycle.
Instead, rest assured that a documentation block is required for each
definition. This requirement uses the names of each section to ensure
that we fulfilled this requirement.
e.g., let's say that block-core.json has a comment block for
"Snapshot!Info" by accident. We'll see this error message:
In file included from ../../qapi/block.json:8:
../../qapi/block-core.json: In struct 'SnapshotInfo':
../../qapi/block-core.json:38: documentation comment is for 'Snapshot!Info'
That's a pretty decent error message.
Now, let's say that we actually mangle it twice, identically:
../../qapi/block-core.json: In struct 'Snapshot!Info':
../../qapi/block-core.json:38: struct has an invalid name
That's also pretty decent. If we forget to fix it in both places, we'll
just be back to the first error.
Therefore, let's just drop this FIXME and adjust the error message to
not imply a more thorough check than is actually performed.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210930205716.1148693-6-jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Several QGA definitions omit a blank line after the symbol
declaration. This works OK currently, but it's the only place where we
do this. Adjust it for consistency.
Future commits may wind up enforcing this formatting.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210930205716.1148693-5-jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Pylint informs us we're not using these arguments. Oops, it's
right. Correct the error message and remove the remaining unused
parameter.
Fix test output now that the error message is improved.
Fixes: e151941d1b
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210930205716.1148693-4-jsnow@redhat.com>
[Commit message formatting tweaked]
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
test-qapi.py -u updates the expected files. Since it fails when they
are absent, users have to create them manually before they can use
test-qapi.py to fill in the contents, say for a new test. Silly.
Improve -u to create them.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210922125619.670673-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
