Reported by Paul Eggert in
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-09/msg00050.html
This program currently prints different results when run with TCG instead
of running on real s390x hardware:
#include <stdio.h>
int overflow_32 (int x, int y)
{
int sum;
return __builtin_sub_overflow (x, y, &sum);
}
int overflow_64 (long long x, long long y)
{
long sum;
return __builtin_sub_overflow (x, y, &sum);
}
int a1 = 0;
int b1 = -2147483648;
long long a2 = 0L;
long long b2 = -9223372036854775808L;
int main ()
{
{
int a = a1;
int b = b1;
printf ("a = 0x%x, b = 0x%x\n", a, b);
printf ("no_overflow = %d\n", ! overflow_32 (a, b));
}
{
long long a = a2;
long long b = b2;
printf ("a = 0x%llx, b = 0x%llx\n", a, b);
printf ("no_overflow = %d\n", ! overflow_64 (a, b));
}
}
Signed-off-by: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/618
Message-Id: <20220323162621.139313-3-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
This program currently prints different results when run with TCG instead
of running on real s390x hardware:
#include <stdio.h>
int overflow_32 (int x, int y)
{
int sum;
return ! __builtin_add_overflow (x, y, &sum);
}
int overflow_64 (long long x, long long y)
{
long sum;
return ! __builtin_add_overflow (x, y, &sum);
}
int a1 = -2147483648;
int b1 = -2147483648;
long long a2 = -9223372036854775808L;
long long b2 = -9223372036854775808L;
int main ()
{
{
int a = a1;
int b = b1;
printf ("a = 0x%x, b = 0x%x\n", a, b);
printf ("no_overflow = %d\n", overflow_32 (a, b));
}
{
long long a = a2;
long long b = b2;
printf ("a = 0x%llx, b = 0x%llx\n", a, b);
printf ("no_overflow = %d\n", overflow_64 (a, b));
}
}
Signed-off-by: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/616
Message-Id: <20220323162621.139313-2-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
According to PoP, both 32- and 64-bit shifts use lowest 6 address
bits. The current code special-cases 32-bit shifts to use only 5 bits,
which is not correct. For example, shifting by 32 bits currently
preserves the initial value, however, it's supposed zero it out
instead.
Fix by merging sh32 and sh64 and adapting CC calculation to shift
values greater than 31.
Fixes: cbe24bfa91 ("target-s390: Convert SHIFT, ROTATE SINGLE")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220112165016.226996-5-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
An overflow occurs for SLAG when at least one shifted bit is not equal
to sign bit. Therefore, we need to check that `shift + 1` bits are
neither all 0s nor all 1s. The current code checks only `shift` bits,
missing some overflows.
Fixes: cbe24bfa91 ("target-s390: Convert SHIFT, ROTATE SINGLE")
Co-developed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220112165016.226996-4-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
move everything related to translate, as well as HELPER code in tcg/
mmu_helper.c stays put for now, as it contains both TCG and KVM code.
After the reshuffling, update MAINTAINERS accordingly.
Make use of the new directory:
target/s390x/tcg/
Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Cho, Yu-Chen <acho@suse.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210707105324.23400-8-acho@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Bruno Haible
Ilya Leoshkevich
Cho, Yu-Chen