We would like to use a same QObject type to represent numbers, whether
they are int, uint, or floats. Getters will allow some compatibility
between the various types if the number fits other representations.
Add a few more tests while at it.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170607163635.17635-7-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[parse_stats_intervals() simplified a bit, comment in
test_visitor_in_int_overflow() tidied up, suppress bogus warnings]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Since the automatic cpuid-level code was introduced in commit
c39c0edf9b ("target-i386: Automatically
set level/xlevel/xlevel2 when needed"), the CPU model tables just define
the default CPUID level code (set using "min-level"). Setting
"[x]level" forces CPUID level to a specific value and disable the
automatic-level logic.
But the PC compat code was not updated and the existing "[x]level"
compat properties broke compatibility for people using features that
triggered the auto-level code. To keep previous behavior, we should set
"min-[x]level" instead of "[x]level" on compat_props.
This was not a problem for most cases, because old machine-types don't
have full-cpuid-auto-level enabled. The only common use case it broke
was the CPUID[7] auto-level code, that was already enabled since the
first CPUID[7] feature was introduced (in QEMU 1.4.0).
This causes the regression reported at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454641
Change the PC compat code to use "min-[x]level" instead of "[x]level" on
compat_props, and add new test cases to ensure we don't break this
again.
Reported-by: "Guo, Zhiyi" <zhguo@redhat.com>
Fixes: c39c0edf9b ("target-i386: Automatically set level/xlevel/xlevel2 when needed")
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Add test code to ensure features are enabled/disabled correctly in the
command-line. The test case use the "feature-words" and
"filtered-features" properties to check if the features were
enabled/disabled correctly.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170508183205.10884-1-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Print a warning when mixing [+-]foo and foo=(on|off) in the -cpu
argument in a way that will break in the future.
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
SVM needs CPUID[0x8000000A] to be available. So if SVM is enabled
in a CPU model or explicitly in the command-line, adjust CPUID
xlevel to expose the CPUID[0x8000000A] leaf.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Instead of requiring users and management software to be aware of
required CPUID level/xlevel/xlevel2 values for each feature,
automatically increase those values when features need them.
This was already done for CPUID[7].EBX, and is now made generic
for all CPUID feature flags. Unit test included, to make sure we
don't break ABI on older machine-types and don't mess with the
CPUID level values if they are explicitly set by the user.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
We're going to change the way level/xlevel/xlevel2 are handled
when enabling features, but we need to keep the old behavior on
existing machine types. Add test cases for that.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Add test code that will check if the automatic CPUID level
changes are working as expected.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Marc-André Lureau