Finally, copy-before-write gets own .bdrv_open and .bdrv_close
handlers, block_init() call and becomes available through bdrv_open().
To achieve this:
- cbw_init gets unused flags argument and becomes cbw_open
- block_copy_state_free() call moved to new cbw_close()
- in bdrv_cbw_append:
- options are completed with driver and node-name, and we can simply
use bdrv_insert_node() to do both open and drained replacing
- in bdrv_cbw_drop:
- cbw_close() is now responsible for freeing s->bcs, so don't do it
here
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-22-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
We are going to publish copy-before-write filter to be used in separate
of backup. Future step would support bitmap for the filter. But let's
start from full set bitmap.
We have to modify backup, as bitmap is first initialized by
copy-before-write filter, and then backup modifies it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-20-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
One more step closer to .bdrv_open(): use options instead of plain
arguments. Move to bdrv_open_child() calls, native for drive open
handlers.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-19-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-18-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
In the next commit we'll get rid of source argument of cbw_init().
Prepare to it now, to make next commit simpler: move the code block
that uses source below attaching the child and use bs->file->bs instead
of source variable.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-17-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
One more step closer to real .bdrv_open() handler: use more usual names
for bs being initialized and its state.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-16-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Move part of bdrv_cbw_append() to new function cbw_open(). It's an
intermediate step for adding normal .bdrv_open() handler to the
filter. With this commit no logic is changed, but we have a function
which will be turned into .bdrv_open() handler in future commit.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-15-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Refactor the function to replace child at last. Thus we don't need to
revert it and code is simplified.
block-copy state initialization being done before replacing the child
doesn't need any drained section.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-14-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
We are going to publish copy-before-write filter, and there no public
backing-child-based filter in Qemu. No reason to create a precedent, so
let's refactor copy-before-write filter instead.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-13-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
bdrv_attach_child() do bdrv_unref() on failure, so we shouldn't do it
by hand here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-12-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
We are going to publish copy-before-write filter. So, user should be
able to create it with blockdev-add first, specifying both filtered and
target children. And then do blockdev-reopen, to actually insert the
filter where needed.
Currently, filter unshares write permission unconditionally on source
node. It's good, but it will not allow to do blockdev-add. So, let's
relax restrictions when filter doesn't have any parent.
Test output is modified, as now permission conflict happens only when
job creates a blk parent for filter node.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-11-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
The main consumer of cluster-size is block-copy. Let's calculate it
here instead of passing through backup-top.
We are going to publish copy-before-write filter soon, so it will be
created through options. But we don't want for now to make explicit
option for cluster-size, let's continue to calculate it automatically.
So, now is the time to get rid of cluster_size argument for
bdrv_cbw_append().
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-10-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[hreitz: Add qemu/error-report.h include to block/block-copy.c]
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
We are going to publish copy-before-write filter, so it would be
initialized through options. Still we don't want to publish compress
and copy-range options, as
1. Modern way to enable compression is to use compress filter.
2. For copy-range it's unclean how to make proper interface:
- it's has experimental prefix for backup job anyway
- the whole BackupPerf structure doesn't make sense for the filter
So, let's just add copy-range possibility to the filter later if
needed.
Still, we are going to continue support for compression and
experimental copy-range in backup job. So, set these options after
filter creation.
Note, that we can drop "compress" argument of bdrv_cbw_append() now, as
well as "perf". The only reason not doing so is that now, when I
prepare this patch the big series around it is already reviewed and I
want to avoid extra rebase conflicts to simplify review of the
following version.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-9-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
We want to simplify initialization interface of copy-before-write
filter as we are going to make it public. So, let's detect fleecing
scheme exactly in block-copy code, to not pass this information through
extra levels.
Why not just set BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING unconditionally: because we are
going to implement new more efficient fleecing scheme which will not
rely on backing feature.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
We are going to convert backup_top to full featured public filter,
which can be used in separate of backup job. Start from renaming from
"how it used" to "what it does".
While updating comments in 283 iotest, drop and rephrase also things
about ".active", as this field is now dropped, and filter doesn't have
"inactive" mode.
Note that this change may be considered as incompatible interface
change, as backup-top filter format name was visible through
query-block and query-named-block-nodes.
Still, consider the following reasoning:
1. backup-top was never documented, so if someone depends on format
name (for driver that can't be used other than it is automatically
inserted on backup job start), it's a kind of "undocumented feature
use". So I think we are free to change it.
2. There is a hope, that there is no such users: it's a lot more native
to give a good node-name to backup-top filter if need to operate
with it somehow, and don't touch format name.
3. Another "incompatible" change in further commit would be moving
copy-before-write filter from using backing child to file child. And
this is even more reasonable than renaming: for now all public
filters are file-child based.
So, it's a risky change, but risk seems small and good interface worth
it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210824083856.17408-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy