I'm not aware of any immediate bugs in qemu where a second runtime
evaluation of the arguments to MIN() or MAX() causes a problem, but
proactively preventing such abuse is easier than falling prey to an
unintended case down the road. At any rate, here's the conversation
that sparked the current patch:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-12/msg05718.html
Update the MIN/MAX macros to only evaluate their argument once at
runtime; this uses typeof(1 ? (a) : (b)) to ensure that we are
promoting the temporaries to the same type as the final comparison (we
have to trigger type promotion, as typeof(bitfield) won't compile; and
we can't use typeof((a) + (b)) or even typeof((a) + 0), as some of our
uses of MAX are on void* pointers where such addition is undefined).
However, we are unable to work around gcc refusing to compile ({}) in
a constant context (such as the array length of a static variable),
even when only used in the dead branch of a __builtin_choose_expr(),
so we have to provide a second macro pair MIN_CONST and MAX_CONST for
use when both arguments are known to be compile-time constants and
where the result must also be usable as a constant; this second form
evaluates arguments multiple times but that doesn't matter for
constants. By using a void expression as the expansion if a
non-constant is presented to this second form, we can enlist the
compiler to ensure the double evaluation is not attempted on
non-constants.
Alas, as both macros now rely on compiler intrinsics, they are no
longer usable in preprocessor #if conditions; those will just have to
be open-coded or the logic rewritten into #define or runtime 'if'
conditions (but where the compiler dead-code-elimination will probably
still apply).
I tested that both gcc 10.1.1 and clang 10.0.0 produce errors for all
forms of macro mis-use. As the errors can sometimes be cryptic, I'm
demonstrating the gcc output:
Use of MIN when MIN_CONST is needed:
In file included from /home/eblake/qemu/qemu-img.c:25:
/home/eblake/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:249:5: error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function
249 | ({ \
| ^
/home/eblake/qemu/qemu-img.c:92:12: note: in expansion of macro ‘MIN’
92 | char array[MIN(1, 2)] = "";
| ^~~
Use of MIN_CONST when MIN is needed:
/home/eblake/qemu/qemu-img.c: In function ‘is_allocated_sectors’:
/home/eblake/qemu/qemu-img.c:1225:15: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
1225 | i = MIN_CONST(i, n);
| ^
Use of MIN in the preprocessor:
In file included from /home/eblake/qemu/accel/tcg/translate-all.c:20:
/home/eblake/qemu/accel/tcg/translate-all.c: In function ‘page_check_range’:
/home/eblake/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:249:6: error: token "{" is not valid in preprocessor expressions
249 | ({ \
| ^
Fix the resulting callsites that used #if or computed a compile-time
constant min or max to use the new macros. cpu-defs.h is interesting,
as CPU_TLB_DYN_MAX_BITS is sometimes used as a constant and sometimes
dynamic.
It may be worth improving glib's MIN/MAX definitions to be saner, but
that is a task for another day.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200625162602.700741-1-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Implement underrun/overrun events of isochronous endpoints
according to XHCI spec (4.10.3.1)
Guest software restarts data streaming when receives these events.
The XHCI reports these events using interrupter assigned
to the slot (as these events do not have TRB), so current
commit adds the field of assigned interrupter to the
XHCISlot structure. Guest software assigns interrupter to the
slot on 'Address Device' and 'Evaluate Context' commands.
Signed-off-by: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@janustech.com>
Message-id: 20190128200444.5128-3-yuri.benditovich@janustech.com
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Moved structs and defines to hcd-xhci.h.
Move nec controller variant to hcd-xhci-nec.c.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20170517103313.8459-1-kraxel@redhat.com
