The only way object_property_add() can fail is when a property with
the same name already exists. Since our property names are all
hardcoded, failure is a programming error, and the appropriate way to
handle it is passing &error_abort.
Same for its variants, except for object_property_add_child(), which
additionally fails when the child already has a parent. Parentage is
also under program control, so this is a programming error, too.
We have a bit over 500 callers. Almost half of them pass
&error_abort, slightly fewer ignore errors, one test case handles
errors, and the remaining few callers pass them to their own callers.
The previous few commits demonstrated once again that ignoring
programming errors is a bad idea.
Of the few ones that pass on errors, several violate the Error API.
The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a
pointer to a variable containing NULL. Passing an argument of the
latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the
first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second
call. ich9_pm_add_properties(), sparc32_ledma_realize(),
sparc32_dma_realize(), xilinx_axidma_realize(), xilinx_enet_realize()
are wrong that way.
When the one appropriate choice of argument is &error_abort, letting
users pick the argument is a bad idea.
Drop parameter @errp and assert the preconditions instead.
There's one exception to "duplicate property name is a programming
error": the way object_property_add() implements the magic (and
undocumented) "automatic arrayification". Don't drop @errp there.
Instead, rename object_property_add() to object_property_try_add(),
and add the obvious wrapper object_property_add().
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-15-armbru@redhat.com>
[Two semantic rebase conflicts resolved]
We obviously don't want to print out an error message if addr points to
a valid register.
Reported-by: Coverity CID 1419391 Missing break in switch
Fixes: 9ae1329ee2 "ppc/pnv: Add models for POWER8 PHB3 PCIe Host bridge"
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <158153365202.3229002.11521084761048102466.stgit@bahia.lan>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The PowerNV machine emulates an OpenPOWER system and the PowerNV chip
devices are models of the internal logic of the POWER processor. They
can not be instantiated by the user on the QEMU command line.
The PHB3/PHB4 devices could be an exception in the future after some
rework on how the device tree is built. For the moment, exclude them
also.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20200129113720.7404-1-clg@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This is a model of the PCIe Host Bridge (PHB3) found on a POWER8
processor. It includes the PowerBus logic interface (PBCQ), IOMMU
support, a single PCIe Gen.3 Root Complex, and support for MSI and LSI
interrupt sources as found on a POWER8 system using the XICS interrupt
controller.
The POWER8 processor comes in different flavors: Venice, Murano,
Naple, each having a different number of PHBs. To make things simpler,
the models provides 3 PHB3 per chip. Some platforms, like the
Firestone, can also couple PHBs on the first chip to provide more
bandwidth but this is too specific to model in QEMU.
XICS requires some adjustment to support the PHB3 MSI. The changes are
provided here but they could be decoupled in prereq patches.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20200127144506.11132-3-clg@kaod.org>
[dwg: Use device_class_set_props()]
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
