Fully removing Sparse support requires more invasive changes. Only
remove the really kernel-specific parts such as address space names.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Mostly change severity levels, but some tests can also be adjusted to refer
to QEMU APIs or data structures.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The ffs(3) family of functions is not portable. MinGW doesn't always
provide the function.
Use ctz32() or ctz64() instead.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1427124571-28598-10-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
CODING_STYLE states the following about braces around blocks:
> The opening brace is on the line that contains the control flow
> statement that introduces the new block; [...]
This is obviously impossible with multi-line conditions. Therefore,
CODING_STYLE does not make any clear statement about where to put the
opening brace after a multi-line condition.
There is a reason to prefer to place the opening brace on an own line
after such a condition while still placing it on the same line as the
"control flow statement" if possible; that reason is that the last line
of a multi-line condition is indented, in the case of "if", it is often
indented by four spaces, just as much as the first statement in the
block will be indented. This is hard to read as there is no clearly
visible distinction between condition and block. Placing the opening
brace on a separate line solves this issue.
Also, there are cases where placing the opening brace on a separate line
is the only viable option; if the previous line had nearly 80 characters
and splitting it is not desirable, the opening brace is naturally placed
on an own line.
This patch fixes checkpatch.pl to not complain about braces on own lines
if the condition introducing the block spanned more than one line, or if
the previous line had 79 or 80 characters.
Furthermore, the warning about not having braces around a block is fixed
to mind braces not being on the last line of the condition.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Most QEMU typedefs are camelcase, starting with one uppercase letter
and containing at least one lowercase letter. There are a few
all-uppercase types, add the most common too.
This fixes recognition of types in lines such as
static __attribute__((unused)) inline void tcg_out8(TCGContext *s, uint8_t v)
(Example provided by Peter Maydell).
Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Enable checkpatch.pl to apply the same checks as C source files for
C++ files with .cpp extensions. It also adds some exceptions for C++
sources to suppress errors for:
- <> used in C++ template arguments (e.g. template <class T>)
- :: used to represent namespaces (e.g. SomeClass::method())
- : used in class declaration (e.g. class T : public Super)
- ~ used in destructor method name (e.g. T::~T())
- spacing around 'catch' (e.g. catch (...))
Signed-off-by: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama@hds.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
For an example:
WARNING: braces {} are necessary even for single statement blocks
+ } else
+ return env->regs[R_EAX];
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 41 lines checked
Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <Don@CloudSwitch.com>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Add debug options to find this issue. They were not listed
in the help because the are not simple to understand the output of.
Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <Don@CloudSwitch.com>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Add debug options to find this issue. They were not listed
in the help because the are not simple to understand the output of.
Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <Don@CloudSwitch.com>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Add debug options to find this issue. They were not listed
in the help because the are not simple to understand the output of.
Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <Don@CloudSwitch.com>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
The new rule detects two wrong variants of QEMU.
It was tested with commit b5a8fe5e.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
accidently->accidentally
annother->another
choosen->chosen
consideres->considers
decriptor->descriptor
developement->development
paramter->parameter
preceed->precede
preceeding->preceding
priviledge->privilege
propogation->propagation
substraction->subtraction
throught->through
upto->up to
usefull->useful
Fix also grammar in posix-aio-compat.c
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
We should only claim that something is a cast if we did not encouter a
token before, that did set av_pending.
This fixes the operator * in the line below to be detected as binary (vs
unary).
kmalloc(sizeof(struct alphatrack_ocmd) * true_size, GFP_KERNEL);
Reported-by: Peter Chubb <nicta.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
(cherry-picked from Linux kernel commit c023e4734c3e8801e0ecb5e81b831d42a374d861)
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
There are 508 non-indented (non-default) labels, and 511 that are
indented. So the rule is debatable at least. Actually, in the
common case of labels at the outermost scope, there is really just
one place where to put the label, so the rule is just wrong IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
checkpatch.pl doesn't report warning for if/else statements with missing
'else' braces:
if (something) {
foo;
} else
bar;
The patch has been tested using the last 100 commits.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Borzenkov <pavel.borzenkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
When having code like this:
static PCIDeviceInfo piix_ide_info[] = {
{
.qdev.name = "piix3-ide",
.qdev.size = sizeof(PCIIDEState),
.qdev.no_user = 1,
.no_hotplug = 1,
.init = pci_piix_ide_initfn,
.vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
.device_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82371SB_1,
.class_id = PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE,
},{
.qdev.name = "piix4-ide",
.qdev.size = sizeof(PCIIDEState),
.qdev.no_user = 1,
.no_hotplug = 1,
.init = pci_piix_ide_initfn,
.vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
.device_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82371AB,
.class_id = PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE,
},{
/* end of list */
}
};
checkpatch currently errors out, claiming that spaces need to follow
commas. However, this particular style of defining structs is pretty
common in qemu code and very readable. So let's declare it as supported
for the above case.
Reported-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Change checkpatch.pl for QEMU use:
- Root directory detection
- Forbid tabs
- Indent at 4 spaces
- Allow typedefs
- Enforce brace use even for single statement blocks
- Don't suggest nonexistent cleanup tools
Mention the script in CODING_STYLE.
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>