Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Markus Armbruster 576f0b8a53 qapi: Improve reporting of invalid 'if' errors
Move check_if() from check_keys() to check_exprs() and call it later,
so its error messages gain an "in definition" line.

Checking values in a function named check_keys() is unclean anyway.
The original sin was commit 0545f6b887 "qapi: Better error messages
for bad expressions", which checks the value of key 'name'.  More
sinning in commit 2cbf09925a "qapi: More rigorous checking for type
safety bypass", commit c818408e44 "qapi: Implement boxed types for
commands/events", and commit 967c885108 "qapi: add 'if' to top-level
expressions".  This commit does penance for the latter.  The next
commits will do penance for the others.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-19-armbru@redhat.com>
2019-09-28 17:17:19 +02:00
Marc-André Lureau 967c885108 qapi: add 'if' to top-level expressions
Accept 'if' key in top-level elements, accepted as string or list of
string type. The following patches will modify the test visitor to
check the value is correctly saved, and generate #if/#endif code (as a
single #if/endif line or a series for a list).

Example of 'if' key:
{ 'struct': 'TestIfStruct', 'data': { 'foo': 'int' },
  'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT)' }

The generated code is for now *unconditional*. Later patches generate
the conditionals.

Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180703155648.11933-2-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
[Commit message and Documentation improved]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2018-07-03 18:21:24 +02:00