The next patch adds a parent drain to bdrv_attach_child_common(), which
shouldn't be, but is currently called from coroutines in some cases (e.g.
.bdrv_co_create implementations generally open new nodes). Therefore,
the assertion that we're not in a coroutine doesn't hold true any more.
We could just remove the assertion because there is nothing in the
function that should be in conflict with running in a coroutine, but
just to be on the safe side, we can reverse the caller relationship
between bdrv_do_drained_begin() and bdrv_do_drained_begin_quiesce() so
that the latter also just drops out of coroutine context and we can
still be certain in the future that any drain code doesn't run in
coroutines.
As a nice side effect, the structure of bdrv_do_drained_begin() is now
symmetrical with bdrv_do_drained_end().
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
05c272ff0c