465fe887cc
The block layer has a couple of cases where it can lose Force Unit Access semantics when writing a large block of zeroes, such that the request returns before the zeroes have been guaranteed to land on underlying media. SCSI does not support FUA during WRITESAME(10/16); FUA is only supported if it falls back to WRITE(10/16). But where the underlying device is new enough to not need a fallback, it means that any upper layer request with FUA semantics was silently ignoring BDRV_REQ_FUA. Conversely, NBD has situations where it can support FUA but not ZERO_WRITE; when that happens, the generic block layer fallback to bdrv_driver_pwritev() (or the older bdrv_co_writev() in qemu 2.6) was losing the FUA flag. The problem of losing flags unrelated to ZERO_WRITE has been latent in bdrv_co_do_write_zeroes() since commit aa7bfbff, but back then, it did not matter because there was no FUA flag. It became observable when commit 93f5e6d8 paved the way for flags that can impact correctness, when we should have been using bdrv_co_writev_flags() with modified flags. Compare to commit 9eeb6dd, which got flag manipulation right in bdrv_co_do_zero_pwritev(). Symptoms: I tested with qemu-io with default writethrough cache (which is supposed to use FUA semantics on every write), and targetted an NBD client connected to a server that intentionally did not advertise NBD_FLAG_SEND_FUA. When doing 'write 0 512', the NBD client sent two operations (NBD_CMD_WRITE then NBD_CMD_FLUSH) to get the fallback FUA semantics; but when doing 'write -z 0 512', the NBD client sent only NBD_CMD_WRITE. The fix is do to a cleanup bdrv_co_flush() at the end of the operation if any step in the middle relied on a BDS that does not natively support FUA for that step (note that we don't need to flush after every operation, if the operation is broken into chunks based on bounce-buffer sizing). Each BDS gains a new flag .supported_zero_flags, which parallels the use of .supported_write_flags but only when accessing a zero write operation (the flags MUST be different, because of SCSI having different semantics based on WRITE vs. WRITESAME; and also because BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP only makes sense on zero writes). Also fix some documentation to describe -ENOTSUP semantics, particularly since iscsi depends on those semantics. Down the road, we may want to add a driver where its .bdrv_co_pwritev() honors all three of BDRV_REQ_FUA, BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE, and BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP, and advertise this via bs->supported_write_flags for blocks opened by that driver; such a driver should NOT supply .bdrv_co_write_zeroes nor .supported_zero_flags. But none of the drivers touched in this patch want to do that (the act of writing zeroes is different enough from normal writes to deserve a second callback). Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
QEMU README
===========
QEMU is a generic and open source machine & userspace emulator and
virtualizer.
QEMU is capable of emulating a complete machine in software without any
need for hardware virtualization support. By using dynamic translation,
it achieves very good performance. QEMU can also integrate with the Xen
and KVM hypervisors to provide emulated hardware while allowing the
hypervisor to manage the CPU. With hypervisor support, QEMU can achieve
near native performance for CPUs. When QEMU emulates CPUs directly it is
capable of running operating systems made for one machine (e.g. an ARMv7
board) on a different machine (e.g. an x86_64 PC board).
QEMU is also capable of providing userspace API virtualization for Linux
and BSD kernel interfaces. This allows binaries compiled against one
architecture ABI (e.g. the Linux PPC64 ABI) to be run on a host using a
different architecture ABI (e.g. the Linux x86_64 ABI). This does not
involve any hardware emulation, simply CPU and syscall emulation.
QEMU aims to fit into a variety of use cases. It can be invoked directly
by users wishing to have full control over its behaviour and settings.
It also aims to facilitate integration into higher level management
layers, by providing a stable command line interface and monitor API.
It is commonly invoked indirectly via the libvirt library when using
open source applications such as oVirt, OpenStack and virt-manager.
QEMU as a whole is released under the GNU General Public License,
version 2. For full licensing details, consult the LICENSE file.
Building
========
QEMU is multi-platform software intended to be buildable on all modern
Linux platforms, OS-X, Win32 (via the Mingw64 toolchain) and a variety
of other UNIX targets. The simple steps to build QEMU are:
mkdir build
cd build
../configure
make
Complete details of the process for building and configuring QEMU for
all supported host platforms can be found in the qemu-tech.html file.
Additional information can also be found online via the QEMU website:
http://qemu-project.org/Hosts/Linux
http://qemu-project.org/Hosts/W32
Submitting patches
==================
The QEMU source code is maintained under the GIT version control system.
git clone git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu.git
When submitting patches, the preferred approach is to use 'git
format-patch' and/or 'git send-email' to format & send the mail to the
qemu-devel@nongnu.org mailing list. All patches submitted must contain
a 'Signed-off-by' line from the author. Patches should follow the
guidelines set out in the HACKING and CODING_STYLE files.
Additional information on submitting patches can be found online via
the QEMU website
http://qemu-project.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch
http://qemu-project.org/Contribute/TrivialPatches
Bug reporting
=============
The QEMU project uses Launchpad as its primary upstream bug tracker. Bugs
found when running code built from QEMU git or upstream released sources
should be reported via:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/
If using QEMU via an operating system vendor pre-built binary package, it
is preferable to report bugs to the vendor's own bug tracker first. If
the bug is also known to affect latest upstream code, it can also be
reported via launchpad.
For additional information on bug reporting consult:
http://qemu-project.org/Contribute/ReportABug
Contact
=======
The QEMU community can be contacted in a number of ways, with the two
main methods being email and IRC
- qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
- #qemu on irc.oftc.net
Information on additional methods of contacting the community can be
found online via the QEMU website:
http://qemu-project.org/Contribute/StartHere
-- End