The following scenario can happen if QEMU sets more RESET flags while
the KVM_RESET_DIRTY_RINGS ioctl is ongoing on another host CPU:
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2
------------------------ ------------------ ------------------------
fill gfn0
store-rel flags for gfn0
fill gfn1
store-rel flags for gfn1
load-acq flags for gfn0
set RESET for gfn0
load-acq flags for gfn1
set RESET for gfn1
do ioctl! ----------->
ioctl(RESET_RINGS)
fill gfn2
store-rel flags for gfn2
load-acq flags for gfn2
set RESET for gfn2
process gfn0
process gfn1
process gfn2
do ioctl!
etc.
The three load-acquire in CPU0 synchronize with the three store-release
in CPU2, but CPU0 and CPU1 are only synchronized up to gfn1 and CPU1
may miss gfn2's fields other than flags.
The kernel must be able to cope with invalid values of the fields, and
userspace *will* invoke the ioctl once more. However, once the RESET flag
is cleared on gfn2, it is lost forever, therefore in the above scenario
CPU1 must read the correct value of gfn2's fields.
Therefore RESET must be set with a store-release, that will synchronize
with KVM's load-acquire in CPU1.
Cc: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
52281c6d11