60c7dd22e1
When ADCX is followed by ADOX or vice versa, the second instruction's carry comes from EFLAGS and the condition codes use the CC_OP_ADCOX operation. Retrieving the carry from EFLAGS is handled by this bit of gen_ADCOX: tcg_gen_extract_tl(carry_in, cpu_cc_src, ctz32(cc_op == CC_OP_ADCX ? CC_C : CC_O), 1); Unfortunately, in this case cc_op has been overwritten by the previous "if" statement to CC_OP_ADCOX. This works by chance when the first instruction is ADCX; however, if the first instruction is ADOX, ADCX will incorrectly take its carry from OF instead of CF. Fix by moving the computation of the new cc_op at the end of the function. The included exhaustive test case fails without this patch and passes afterwards. Because ADCX/ADOX need not be invoked through the VEX prefix, this regression bisects to commit 16fc5726a6e2 ("target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x38, add AVX", 2022-10-18). However, the mistake happened a little earlier, when BMI instructions were rewritten using the new decoder framework. Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1471 Reported-by: Paul Jolly <https://gitlab.com/myitcv> Fixes: 1d0b926150e5 ("target/i386: move scalar 0F 38 and 0F 3A instruction to new decoder", 2022-10-18) Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>