880eeec613
Now that the API offers also _locked() functions, take advantage
of it and give also the caller control to take the lock and call
_locked functions.
This makes sense especially when we have for loops, because it
makes no sense to have:
for(job = job_next(); ...)
where each job_next() takes the lock internally.
Instead we want
JOB_LOCK_GUARD();
for(job = job_next_locked(); ...)
In addition, protect also direct field accesses, by either creating a
new critical section or widening the existing ones.
Note: at this stage, job_{lock/unlock} and job lock guard macros
are *nop*.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20220926093214.506243-12-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| hmp-cmds.c | ||
| hmp.c | ||
| meson.build | ||
| misc.c | ||
| monitor-internal.h | ||
| monitor.c | ||
| qmp-cmds-control.c | ||
| qmp-cmds.c | ||
| qmp.c | ||
| trace-events | ||
| trace.h | ||