AIUI, ->unplug_request in the HotplugHandler is used for "soft"
unplug, where acknowledgement from the guest is required before
completing the unplug, whereas ->unplug is used for "hard" unplug
where qemu unilaterally removes the device, and the guest just has to
cope with its sudden absence. For spapr we (correctly) use
->unplug_request for CPU and memory hot unplug but we use ->unplug for
PCI.
While I think it might be possible to support "hard" PCI unplug within
the PAPR model, that's not how it actually works now. Although it's
called from ->unplug, the PCI unplug path will usually just mark the
device for removal, with completion of the unplug delayed until
userspace responds to the unplug notification. If the guest doesn't
respond as expected, that could delay the unplug completion arbitrarily
long.
To reflect that, change the PCI unplug path to be called from
->unplug_request. We also rename spapr_phb_hot_plug_child() and
spapr_phb_hot_unplug_child() to spapr_pci_plug() and
spapr_pci_unplug_request() to more obviously reflect the callbacks they're
implementing.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
3340e5c4f2