376863ef48
Rather than open-code the check for a valid base type, we should reuse the common functionality. This allows for consistent error messages, and also makes it easier for a later patch to turn on support for inline anonymous base structures. Test flat-union-inline is updated to test only one feature (anonymous branch dictionaries), which can be implemented independently (test flat-union-bad-base already covers the idea of an anonymous base dictionary). Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-10-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
12 lines
385 B
JSON
12 lines
385 B
JSON
# we require branches to be a struct name
|
|
# TODO: should we allow anonymous inline branch types?
|
|
{ 'enum': 'TestEnum',
|
|
'data': [ 'value1', 'value2' ] }
|
|
{ 'struct': 'Base',
|
|
'data': { 'enum1': 'TestEnum', 'kind': 'str' } }
|
|
{ 'union': 'TestUnion',
|
|
'base': 'Base',
|
|
'discriminator': 'enum1',
|
|
'data': { 'value1': { 'string': 'str' },
|
|
'value2': { 'integer': 'int' } } }
|