6f0e9c26db
A number of hardware platforms are implementing mechanisms whereby the hypervisor does not have unfettered access to guest memory, in order to mitigate the security impact of a compromised hypervisor. AMD's SEV implements this with in-cpu memory encryption, and Intel has its own memory encryption mechanism. POWER has an upcoming mechanism to accomplish this in a different way, using a new memory protection level plus a small trusted ultravisor. s390 also has a protected execution environment. The current code (committed or draft) for these features has each platform's version configured entirely differently. That doesn't seem ideal for users, or particularly for management layers. AMD SEV introduces a notionally generic machine option "machine-encryption", but it doesn't actually cover any cases other than SEV. This series is a proposal to at least partially unify configuration for these mechanisms, by renaming and generalizing AMD's "memory-encryption" property. It is replaced by a "confidential-guest-support" property pointing to a platform specific object which configures and manages the specific details. Note to Ram Pai: the documentation I've included for PEF is very minimal. If you could send a patch expanding on that, it would be very helpful. Changes since v8: * Rebase * Fixed some cosmetic typos Changes since v7: * Tweaked and clarified meaning of the 'ready' flag * Polished the interface to the PEF internals * Shifted initialization for s390 PV later (I hope I've finally got this after apply_cpu_model() where it needs to be) Changes since v6: * Moved to using OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE and OBJECT_DEFINE_TYPE macros * Assorted minor fixes Changes since v5: * Renamed from "securable guest memory" to "confidential guest support" * Simpler reworking of x86 boot time flash encryption * Added a bunch of documentation * Fixed some compile errors on POWER Changes since v4: * Renamed from "host trust limitation" to "securable guest memory", which I think is marginally more descriptive * Re-organized initialization, because the previous model called at kvm_init didn't work for s390 * Assorted fixes to the s390 implementation; rudimentary testing (gitlab CI) only Changes since v3: * Rebased * Added first cut at handling of s390 protected virtualization Changes since RFCv2: * Rebased * Removed preliminary SEV cleanups (they've been merged) * Changed name to "host trust limitation" * Added migration blocker to the PEF code (based on SEV's version) Changes since RFCv1: * Rebased * Fixed some errors pointed out by Dave Gilbert -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEdfRlhq5hpmzETofcbDjKyiDZs5IFAmAg1R8ACgkQbDjKyiDZ s5KCVRAAgm/xlgEv2hDZ7z+MuOTNesCpR3uU4iX02xNktox96Qai7XlrA7bhDf1v y/0FLnOOL6Kn5OHeS2CiDPIgWIUfapSwDsTPooZ6GqfzCI+r0jIaSBu59IBhvJRh o3ZTfT2fsckY9Gy2YN29ssN87ovDTPNlvRAxGH/71mMKEGJcK6QWxGcsyJDmeKq4 0/tOQaLMFRRagTpwqCT1eacMzyQwkoDcywQHfi0Is+Q4voWPKgDY0qPqLd1OG2XI cMQ8fagums3NkPpVbKAW7sIvDiHtH1HNDoHKTiwKtTUsN5LBz+LN87LoKAdBasV0 AiRm8gi+CkF/NOA2RjwaFmThxt7sr8kTKVuIqTo5m8agqkhJr97+gBxUym49CxTx 1Zjo9TWsprKXnXl8vfGtAIZ4pkYQzomMDT3AilEST3+zbpRuwTMGOJ5vLF7RrKtF AtF2XBiPGZ/NztpbmaukuG/R49wwW5we4dR1zySMcoTsAl1rIzxpfwBnYatOY0Hg sVc9gABwQ0kacsseVIX72c+30U02cR8f6uRfuqNAEUW13vdAo/5/PXxGVlevMkw5 33MYr16CkGnYgtgJtORK+x8/vPlAYiBzZrn71Wym7yKCamf8LMbzPNXKjUaD/GT8 TZG7abTV8vuS0m7V/hGgV8nTVaG/6VLEyAtO6YpjQ+1p+dO8xBc= =TTeT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/dg-gitlab/tags/cgs-pull-request' into staging Generalize memory encryption models A number of hardware platforms are implementing mechanisms whereby the hypervisor does not have unfettered access to guest memory, in order to mitigate the security impact of a compromised hypervisor. AMD's SEV implements this with in-cpu memory encryption, and Intel has its own memory encryption mechanism. POWER has an upcoming mechanism to accomplish this in a different way, using a new memory protection level plus a small trusted ultravisor. s390 also has a protected execution environment. The current code (committed or draft) for these features has each platform's version configured entirely differently. That doesn't seem ideal for users, or particularly for management layers. AMD SEV introduces a notionally generic machine option "machine-encryption", but it doesn't actually cover any cases other than SEV. This series is a proposal to at least partially unify configuration for these mechanisms, by renaming and generalizing AMD's "memory-encryption" property. It is replaced by a "confidential-guest-support" property pointing to a platform specific object which configures and manages the specific details. Note to Ram Pai: the documentation I've included for PEF is very minimal. If you could send a patch expanding on that, it would be very helpful. Changes since v8: * Rebase * Fixed some cosmetic typos Changes since v7: * Tweaked and clarified meaning of the 'ready' flag * Polished the interface to the PEF internals * Shifted initialization for s390 PV later (I hope I've finally got this after apply_cpu_model() where it needs to be) Changes since v6: * Moved to using OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE and OBJECT_DEFINE_TYPE macros * Assorted minor fixes Changes since v5: * Renamed from "securable guest memory" to "confidential guest support" * Simpler reworking of x86 boot time flash encryption * Added a bunch of documentation * Fixed some compile errors on POWER Changes since v4: * Renamed from "host trust limitation" to "securable guest memory", which I think is marginally more descriptive * Re-organized initialization, because the previous model called at kvm_init didn't work for s390 * Assorted fixes to the s390 implementation; rudimentary testing (gitlab CI) only Changes since v3: * Rebased * Added first cut at handling of s390 protected virtualization Changes since RFCv2: * Rebased * Removed preliminary SEV cleanups (they've been merged) * Changed name to "host trust limitation" * Added migration blocker to the PEF code (based on SEV's version) Changes since RFCv1: * Rebased * Fixed some errors pointed out by Dave Gilbert # gpg: Signature made Mon 08 Feb 2021 06:07:27 GMT # gpg: using RSA key 75F46586AE61A66CC44E87DC6C38CACA20D9B392 # gpg: Good signature from "David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>" [full] # gpg: aka "David Gibson (Red Hat) <dgibson@redhat.com>" [full] # gpg: aka "David Gibson (ozlabs.org) <dgibson@ozlabs.org>" [full] # gpg: aka "David Gibson (kernel.org) <dwg@kernel.org>" [unknown] # Primary key fingerprint: 75F4 6586 AE61 A66C C44E 87DC 6C38 CACA 20D9 B392 * remotes/dg-gitlab/tags/cgs-pull-request: s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option confidential guest support: Alter virtio default properties for protected guests spapr: PEF: prevent migration spapr: Add PEF based confidential guest support confidential guest support: Update documentation confidential guest support: Move SEV initialization into arch specific code confidential guest support: Introduce cgs "ready" flag sev: Add Error ** to sev_kvm_init() confidential guest support: Rework the "memory-encryption" property confidential guest support: Move side effect out of machine_set_memory_encryption() sev: Remove false abstraction of flash encryption confidential guest support: Introduce new confidential guest support class qom: Allow optional sugar props Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
authz | ||
block | ||
chardev | ||
crypto | ||
disas | ||
exec | ||
fpu | ||
hw | ||
io | ||
libdecnumber | ||
migration | ||
monitor | ||
net | ||
qapi | ||
qemu | ||
qom | ||
scsi | ||
standard-headers | ||
sysemu | ||
tcg | ||
ui | ||
user | ||
elf.h | ||
glib-compat.h | ||
qemu-common.h | ||
qemu-io.h | ||
trace-tcg.h |