Packet size some time different or when network is busy.
Based on same payload size, but TCP protocol can not
guarantee send the same one packet in the same way,
like that:
We send this payload:
------------------------------
| header |1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0|
------------------------------
primary:
ppkt1:
----------------
| header |1|2|3|
----------------
ppkt2:
------------------------
| header |4|5|6|7|8|9|0|
------------------------
secondary:
spkt1:
------------------------------
| header |1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0|
------------------------------
In the original method, ppkt1 and ppkt2 are different in size and
spkt1, so they can't compare and trigger the checkpoint.
I have tested FTP get 200M and 1G file many times, I found that
the performance was less than 1% of the native.
Now I reconstructed the comparison of TCP packets based on the
TCP sequence number. first of all, ppkt1 and spkt1 have the same
starting sequence number, so they can compare, even though their
length is different. And then ppkt1 with a smaller payload length
is used as the comparison length, if the payload is same, send
out the ppkt1 and record the offset(the length of ppkt1 payload)
in spkt1. The next comparison, ppkt2 and spkt1 can be compared
from the recorded position of spkt1.
like that:
----------------
| header |1|2|3| ppkt1
---------|-----|
| |
---------v-----v--------------
| header |1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0| spkt1
---------------|\------------|
| \offset |
---------v-------------v
| header |4|5|6|7|8|9|0| ppkt2
------------------------
In this way, the performance can reach native 20% in my multiple
tests.
Cc: Zhang Chen <zhangckid@gmail.com>
Cc: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mao Zhongyi <maozy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangckid@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Chen <zhangckid@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Chen <zhangckid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
f449c9e549