It's very easy for the CPU specific has_work() implementation
and the logic in ppc_hw_interrupt() to be subtly out of sync.
This can occasionally allow a CPU to wakeup from a PM state
and resume executing past the PM instruction when it should
resume at the 0x100 vector.
This detects if it happens and aborts, making it a lot easier
to catch such bugs when testing rather than chasing obscure
guest misbehaviour.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20190215161648.9600-8-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
f8154fd22b