64 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
name: Library Tracking Issue
|
||
|
about: A tracking issue for an unstable library feature.
|
||
|
title: Tracking Issue for XXX
|
||
|
labels: C-tracking-issue T-libs
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
Thank you for creating a tracking issue!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tracking issues are for tracking a feature from implementation to stabilization.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Make sure to include the relevant RFC for the feature if it has one.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If the new feature is small, it may be fine to skip the RFC process. In that
|
||
|
case, you can use use `issue = "none"` in your initial implementation PR. The
|
||
|
reviewer will ask you to open a tracking issue if they agree your feature can be
|
||
|
added without an RFC.
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
|
||
|
Feature gate: `#![feature(...)]`
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is a tracking issue for ...
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
Include a short description of the feature.
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Public API
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
For most library features, it'd be useful to include a summarized version of the public API.
|
||
|
(E.g. just the public function signatures without their doc comments or implementation.)
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
|
||
|
```rust
|
||
|
...
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Steps / History
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
In the simplest case, this is a PR implementing the feature followed by a PR
|
||
|
that stabilises the feature. However it's not uncommon for the feature to be
|
||
|
changed before stabilization. For larger features, the implementation could be
|
||
|
split up in multiple steps.
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
|
||
|
- [ ] Implementation: ...
|
||
|
- [ ] Stabilization PR
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Unresolved Questions
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
Include any open questions that need to be answered before the feature can be
|
||
|
stabilised. If multiple (unrelated) big questions come up, it can be a good idea
|
||
|
to open a separate issue for each, to make it easier to keep track of the
|
||
|
discussions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It's useful to link any relevant discussions and conclusions (whether on GitHub,
|
||
|
Zulip, or the internals forum) here.
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
|
||
|
- None yet.
|