rust/tests/ui/mutex_atomic.stderr

error: Consider using an AtomicBool instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
  --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:19:5
   |
19 |     Mutex::new(true);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: `-D clippy::mutex-atomic` implied by `-D warnings`

error: Consider using an AtomicUsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
  --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:20:5
   |
20 |     Mutex::new(5usize);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: Consider using an AtomicIsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
  --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:21:5
   |
21 |     Mutex::new(9isize);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: Consider using an AtomicPtr instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
  --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:23:5
   |
23 |     Mutex::new(&x as *const u32);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: Consider using an AtomicPtr instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
  --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:24:5
   |
24 |     Mutex::new(&mut x as *mut u32);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: Consider using an AtomicUsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
  --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:25:5
   |
25 |     Mutex::new(0u32);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: `-D clippy::mutex-integer` implied by `-D warnings`

error: Consider using an AtomicIsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
  --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:26:5
   |
26 |     Mutex::new(0i32);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: aborting due to 7 previous errors