Promote missing_fragment_specifier to hard error

It has been deny_by_default since 2017 (and warned for some time
before that), so it seems reasonable to promote it.

The specific technical motivation to do this now is to remove a field
from `ParseSess` -- it is a global state, and global state makes
extracting libraries annoying.

Closes #40107
This commit is contained in:
Aleksey Kladov 2020-08-14 11:24:01 +02:00
parent 84fcd0dc99
commit 02eae432e7
14 changed files with 32 additions and 90 deletions

View File

@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ enum TokenTree {
/// e.g., `$var`
MetaVar(Span, Ident),
/// e.g., `$var:expr`. This is only used in the left hand side of MBE macros.
MetaVarDecl(Span, Ident /* name to bind */, Option<NonterminalKind>),
MetaVarDecl(Span, Ident /* name to bind */, NonterminalKind),
}
impl TokenTree {

View File

@ -378,11 +378,6 @@ fn nameize<I: Iterator<Item = NamedMatch>>(
n_rec(sess, next_m, res.by_ref(), ret_val)?;
}
}
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, _, None) => {
if sess.missing_fragment_specifiers.borrow_mut().remove(&span).is_some() {
return Err((span, "missing fragment specifier".to_string()));
}
}
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(sp, bind_name, _) => match ret_val
.entry(MacroRulesNormalizedIdent::new(bind_name))
{
@ -442,7 +437,6 @@ fn token_name_eq(t1: &Token, t2: &Token) -> bool {
///
/// A `ParseResult`. Note that matches are kept track of through the items generated.
fn inner_parse_loop<'root, 'tt>(
sess: &ParseSess,
cur_items: &mut SmallVec<[MatcherPosHandle<'root, 'tt>; 1]>,
next_items: &mut Vec<MatcherPosHandle<'root, 'tt>>,
eof_items: &mut SmallVec<[MatcherPosHandle<'root, 'tt>; 1]>,
@ -560,16 +554,9 @@ fn inner_parse_loop<'root, 'tt>(
})));
}
// We need to match a metavar (but the identifier is invalid)... this is an error
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, _, None) => {
if sess.missing_fragment_specifiers.borrow_mut().remove(&span).is_some() {
return Error(span, "missing fragment specifier".to_string());
}
}
// We need to match a metavar with a valid ident... call out to the black-box
// parser by adding an item to `bb_items`.
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, _, Some(kind)) => {
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, _, kind) => {
// Built-in nonterminals never start with these tokens,
// so we can eliminate them from consideration.
if Parser::nonterminal_may_begin_with(kind, token) {
@ -640,7 +627,6 @@ pub(super) fn parse_tt(parser: &mut Cow<'_, Parser<'_>>, ms: &[TokenTree]) -> Na
// parsing from the black-box parser done. The result is that `next_items` will contain a
// bunch of possible next matcher positions in `next_items`.
match inner_parse_loop(
parser.sess,
&mut cur_items,
&mut next_items,
&mut eof_items,
@ -702,7 +688,7 @@ pub(super) fn parse_tt(parser: &mut Cow<'_, Parser<'_>>, ms: &[TokenTree]) -> Na
let nts = bb_items
.iter()
.map(|item| match item.top_elts.get_tt(item.idx) {
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, bind, Some(kind)) => format!("{} ('{}')", kind, bind),
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, bind, kind) => format!("{} ('{}')", kind, bind),
_ => panic!(),
})
.collect::<Vec<String>>()
@ -732,7 +718,7 @@ pub(super) fn parse_tt(parser: &mut Cow<'_, Parser<'_>>, ms: &[TokenTree]) -> Na
assert_eq!(bb_items.len(), 1);
let mut item = bb_items.pop().unwrap();
if let TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, _, Some(kind)) = item.top_elts.get_tt(item.idx) {
if let TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, _, kind) = item.top_elts.get_tt(item.idx) {
let match_cur = item.match_cur;
let nt = match parser.to_mut().parse_nonterminal(kind) {
Err(mut err) => {

View File

@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ pub fn compile_declarative_macro(
let diag = &sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic;
let lhs_nm = Ident::new(sym::lhs, def.span);
let rhs_nm = Ident::new(sym::rhs, def.span);
let tt_spec = Some(NonterminalKind::TT);
let tt_spec = NonterminalKind::TT;
// Parse the macro_rules! invocation
let (macro_rules, body) = match &def.kind {
@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ fn check_lhs_no_empty_seq(sess: &ParseSess, tts: &[mbe::TokenTree]) -> bool {
TokenTree::Sequence(span, ref seq) => {
if seq.separator.is_none()
&& seq.tts.iter().all(|seq_tt| match *seq_tt {
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, _, Some(NonterminalKind::Vis)) => true,
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, _, NonterminalKind::Vis) => true,
TokenTree::Sequence(_, ref sub_seq) => {
sub_seq.kleene.op == mbe::KleeneOp::ZeroOrMore
|| sub_seq.kleene.op == mbe::KleeneOp::ZeroOrOne
@ -960,7 +960,7 @@ fn check_matcher_core(
// Now `last` holds the complete set of NT tokens that could
// end the sequence before SUFFIX. Check that every one works with `suffix`.
for token in &last.tokens {
if let TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, name, Some(kind)) = *token {
if let TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, name, kind) = *token {
for next_token in &suffix_first.tokens {
match is_in_follow(next_token, kind) {
IsInFollow::Yes => {}
@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ fn check_matcher_core(
}
fn token_can_be_followed_by_any(tok: &mbe::TokenTree) -> bool {
if let mbe::TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, _, Some(kind)) = *tok {
if let mbe::TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, _, kind) = *tok {
frag_can_be_followed_by_any(kind)
} else {
// (Non NT's can always be followed by anything in matchers.)
@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ fn is_in_follow(tok: &mbe::TokenTree, kind: NonterminalKind) -> IsInFollow {
}
_ => IsInFollow::No(TOKENS),
},
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, _, Some(NonterminalKind::Block)) => IsInFollow::Yes,
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, _, NonterminalKind::Block) => IsInFollow::Yes,
_ => IsInFollow::No(TOKENS),
}
}
@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ fn is_in_follow(tok: &mbe::TokenTree, kind: NonterminalKind) -> IsInFollow {
TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(
_,
_,
Some(NonterminalKind::Ident | NonterminalKind::Ty | NonterminalKind::Path),
NonterminalKind::Ident | NonterminalKind::Ty | NonterminalKind::Path,
) => IsInFollow::Yes,
_ => IsInFollow::No(TOKENS),
}
@ -1171,8 +1171,7 @@ fn quoted_tt_to_string(tt: &mbe::TokenTree) -> String {
match *tt {
mbe::TokenTree::Token(ref token) => pprust::token_to_string(&token),
mbe::TokenTree::MetaVar(_, name) => format!("${}", name),
mbe::TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, name, Some(kind)) => format!("${}:{}", name, kind),
mbe::TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, name, None) => format!("${}:", name),
mbe::TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(_, name, kind) => format!("${}:{}", name, kind),
_ => panic!(
"unexpected mbe::TokenTree::{{Sequence or Delimited}} \
in follow set checker"

View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ use crate::mbe::{Delimited, KleeneOp, KleeneToken, SequenceRepetition, TokenTree
use rustc_ast::token::{self, Token};
use rustc_ast::tokenstream;
use rustc_ast::{NodeId, DUMMY_NODE_ID};
use rustc_ast::NodeId;
use rustc_ast_pretty::pprust;
use rustc_session::parse::ParseSess;
use rustc_span::symbol::{kw, Ident};
@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ pub(super) fn parse(
.emit();
token::NonterminalKind::Ident
});
result.push(TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, ident, Some(kind)));
result.push(TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, ident, kind));
continue;
}
_ => token.span,
@ -83,11 +83,8 @@ pub(super) fn parse(
}
tree => tree.as_ref().map(tokenstream::TokenTree::span).unwrap_or(start_sp),
};
if node_id != DUMMY_NODE_ID {
// Macros loaded from other crates have dummy node ids.
sess.missing_fragment_specifiers.borrow_mut().insert(span, node_id);
}
result.push(TokenTree::MetaVarDecl(span, ident, None));
sess.span_diagnostic.struct_span_err(span, "missing fragment specifier").emit();
continue;
}
// Not a metavar or no matchers allowed, so just return the tree

View File

@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ use rustc_passes::{self, hir_stats, layout_test};
use rustc_plugin_impl as plugin;
use rustc_resolve::{Resolver, ResolverArenas};
use rustc_session::config::{CrateType, Input, OutputFilenames, OutputType, PpMode, PpSourceMode};
use rustc_session::lint;
use rustc_session::output::{filename_for_input, filename_for_metadata};
use rustc_session::search_paths::PathKind;
use rustc_session::Session;
@ -307,27 +306,11 @@ fn configure_and_expand_inner<'a>(
ecx.check_unused_macros();
});
let mut missing_fragment_specifiers: Vec<_> = ecx
.sess
.parse_sess
.missing_fragment_specifiers
.borrow()
.iter()
.map(|(span, node_id)| (*span, *node_id))
.collect();
missing_fragment_specifiers.sort_unstable_by_key(|(span, _)| *span);
let recursion_limit_hit = ecx.reduced_recursion_limit.is_some();
for (span, node_id) in missing_fragment_specifiers {
let lint = lint::builtin::MISSING_FRAGMENT_SPECIFIER;
let msg = "missing fragment specifier";
resolver.lint_buffer().buffer_lint(lint, node_id, span, msg);
}
if cfg!(windows) {
env::set_var("PATH", &old_path);
}
let recursion_limit_hit = ecx.reduced_recursion_limit.is_some();
if recursion_limit_hit {
// If we hit a recursion limit, exit early to avoid later passes getting overwhelmed
// with a large AST

View File

@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ pub struct ParseSess {
pub unstable_features: UnstableFeatures,
pub config: CrateConfig,
pub edition: Edition,
pub missing_fragment_specifiers: Lock<FxHashMap<Span, NodeId>>,
/// Places where raw identifiers were used. This is used for feature-gating raw identifiers.
pub raw_identifier_spans: Lock<Vec<Span>>,
/// Used to determine and report recursive module inclusions.
@ -154,7 +153,6 @@ impl ParseSess {
unstable_features: UnstableFeatures::from_environment(),
config: FxHashSet::default(),
edition: ExpnId::root().expn_data().edition,
missing_fragment_specifiers: Default::default(),
raw_identifier_spans: Lock::new(Vec::new()),
included_mod_stack: Lock::new(vec![]),
source_map,

View File

@ -5,10 +5,6 @@ macro_rules! foo {
( $($i:ident)* ) => { $($i)+ }; //~ WARN meta-variable repeats with different Kleene operator
}
#[warn(missing_fragment_specifier)]
macro_rules! m { ($i) => {} } //~ WARN missing fragment specifier
//~| WARN this was previously accepted
#[warn(soft_unstable)]
mod benches {
#[bench] //~ WARN use of unstable library feature 'test'

View File

@ -12,28 +12,14 @@ note: the lint level is defined here
LL | #[warn(meta_variable_misuse)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
warning: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/expansion-time.rs:9:19
|
LL | macro_rules! m { ($i) => {} }
| ^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/expansion-time.rs:8:8
|
LL | #[warn(missing_fragment_specifier)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>
warning: use of unstable library feature 'test': `bench` is a part of custom test frameworks which are unstable
--> $DIR/expansion-time.rs:14:7
--> $DIR/expansion-time.rs:10:7
|
LL | #[bench]
| ^^^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/expansion-time.rs:12:8
--> $DIR/expansion-time.rs:8:8
|
LL | #[warn(soft_unstable)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@ -47,10 +33,10 @@ LL | 2
| ^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/expansion-time.rs:19:8
--> $DIR/expansion-time.rs:15:8
|
LL | #[warn(incomplete_include)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
warning: 4 warnings emitted
warning: 3 warnings emitted

View File

@ -2,6 +2,5 @@
macro_rules! m { ($i) => {} }
//~^ ERROR missing fragment specifier
//~| WARN previously accepted
fn main() {}

View File

@ -3,10 +3,6 @@ error: missing fragment specifier
|
LL | macro_rules! m { ($i) => {} }
| ^^
|
= note: `#[deny(missing_fragment_specifier)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ macro_rules! test {
($a, $b) => {
//~^ ERROR missing fragment
//~| ERROR missing fragment
//~| WARN this was previously accepted
()
};
}

View File

@ -9,10 +9,6 @@ error: missing fragment specifier
|
LL | ($a, $b) => {
| ^^
|
= note: `#[deny(missing_fragment_specifier)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

View File

@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ macro_rules! foo {
{ $+ } => { //~ ERROR expected identifier, found `+`
//~^ ERROR missing fragment specifier
$(x)(y) //~ ERROR expected one of: `*`, `+`, or `?`
//~^ ERROR attempted to repeat an expression containing no syntax variables
}
}

View File

@ -4,17 +4,23 @@ error: expected identifier, found `+`
LL | { $+ } => {
| ^
error: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/issue-33569.rs:2:8
|
LL | { $+ } => {
| ^
error: expected one of: `*`, `+`, or `?`
--> $DIR/issue-33569.rs:4:13
|
LL | $(x)(y)
| ^^^
error: missing fragment specifier
--> $DIR/issue-33569.rs:2:8
error: attempted to repeat an expression containing no syntax variables matched as repeating at this depth
--> $DIR/issue-33569.rs:4:10
|
LL | { $+ } => {
| ^
LL | $(x)(y)
| ^^^
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
error: aborting due to 4 previous errors