From 087b838dd2d3cb4e18e0f089cc9886e646d8b49f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nathan Moos Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:56:35 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] process:exit -> process::exit in mem::forget docs The documentation in mem::forget says "...or call `process:exit`..." instead of `process::exit`. r? @steveklabnik --- src/libcore/mem.rs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/libcore/mem.rs b/src/libcore/mem.rs index 7be927b28ed..b397aba6b92 100644 --- a/src/libcore/mem.rs +++ b/src/libcore/mem.rs @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ pub use intrinsics::transmute; /// `forget` is not marked as `unsafe`, because Rust's safety guarantees /// do not include a guarantee that destructors will always run. For example, /// a program can create a reference cycle using [`Rc`][rc], or call -/// [`process:exit`][exit] to exit without running destructors. Thus, allowing +/// [`process::exit`][exit] to exit without running destructors. Thus, allowing /// `mem::forget` from safe code does not fundamentally change Rust's safety /// guarantees. ///