From f66793757fd1cdfa6098ec1b8532ba0382792c4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonas Schievink Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:17:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Don't run coherence twice for future-compat lints --- .../traits/specialize/specialization_graph.rs | 73 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/librustc/traits/specialize/specialization_graph.rs b/src/librustc/traits/specialize/specialization_graph.rs index ca7740199ec..e09bcdcbc62 100644 --- a/src/librustc/traits/specialize/specialization_graph.rs +++ b/src/librustc/traits/specialize/specialization_graph.rs @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ impl<'tcx> Children { impl_def_id, simplified_self, possible_sibling, ); - let overlap_error = |overlap: traits::coherence::OverlapResult<'_>| { - // Found overlap, but no specialization; error out. + let create_overlap_error = |overlap: traits::coherence::OverlapResult<'_>| { let trait_ref = overlap.impl_header.trait_ref.unwrap(); let self_ty = trait_ref.self_ty(); + OverlapError { with_impl: possible_sibling, trait_desc: trait_ref.print_only_trait_path().to_string(), @@ -106,21 +106,49 @@ impl<'tcx> Children { } }; - let allowed_to_overlap = - tcx.impls_are_allowed_to_overlap(impl_def_id, possible_sibling); + let report_overlap_error = |overlap: traits::coherence::OverlapResult<'_>, + last_lint: &mut _| { + // Found overlap, but no specialization; error out or report future-compat warning. + // Do we *still* get overlap if we disable the future-incompatible modes? + let should_err = traits::overlapping_impls( + tcx, + possible_sibling, + impl_def_id, + traits::SkipLeakCheck::default(), + |_| true, + || false, + ); + + let error = create_overlap_error(overlap); + + if should_err { + Err(error) + } else { + *last_lint = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError { + error, + kind: FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind::LeakCheck, + }); + + Ok((false, false)) + } + }; + + let last_lint_mut = &mut last_lint; let (le, ge) = traits::overlapping_impls( tcx, possible_sibling, impl_def_id, - traits::SkipLeakCheck::default(), + traits::SkipLeakCheck::Yes, |overlap| { - if let Some(overlap_kind) = &allowed_to_overlap { + if let Some(overlap_kind) = + tcx.impls_are_allowed_to_overlap(impl_def_id, possible_sibling) + { match overlap_kind { ty::ImplOverlapKind::Permitted { marker: _ } => {} ty::ImplOverlapKind::Issue33140 => { - last_lint = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError { - error: overlap_error(overlap), + *last_lint_mut = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError { + error: create_overlap_error(overlap), kind: FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind::Issue33140, }); } @@ -132,7 +160,11 @@ impl<'tcx> Children { let le = tcx.specializes((impl_def_id, possible_sibling)); let ge = tcx.specializes((possible_sibling, impl_def_id)); - if le == ge { Err(overlap_error(overlap)) } else { Ok((le, ge)) } + if le == ge { + report_overlap_error(overlap, last_lint_mut) + } else { + Ok((le, ge)) + } }, || Ok((false, false)), )?; @@ -153,27 +185,8 @@ impl<'tcx> Children { replace_children.push(possible_sibling); } else { - if let None = allowed_to_overlap { - // Do future-compat checks for overlap. - - if last_lint.is_none() { - traits::overlapping_impls( - tcx, - possible_sibling, - impl_def_id, - traits::SkipLeakCheck::Yes, - |overlap| { - last_lint = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError { - error: overlap_error(overlap), - kind: FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind::LeakCheck, - }); - }, - || (), - ); - } - } - - // no overlap (error bailed already via ?) + // Either there's no overlap, or the overlap was already reported by + // `overlap_error`. } }