OpenE2K
/
rust
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

be explicit that mem::uninitialized is the same as MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init()

This commit is contained in:
Ralf Jung 2019-12-13 13:13:37 +01:00
parent 9409c208a9
commit 216b9ae878
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/libcore/mem/mod.rs
View File

@ -510,7 +510,9 @@ pub unsafe fn zeroed<T>() -> T {
/// **This function is deprecated.** Use [`MaybeUninit<T>`] instead.
///
/// The reason for deprecation is that the function basically cannot be used
/// correctly: [the Rust compiler assumes][inv] that values are properly initialized.
/// correctly: it has the same effect as [`MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init()`][uninit].
/// As the [`assume_init` documentation][assume_init] explains,
/// [the Rust compiler assumes][inv] that values are properly initialized.
/// As a consequence, calling e.g. `mem::uninitialized::<bool>()` causes immediate
/// undefined behavior for returning a `bool` that is not definitely either `true`
/// or `false`. Worse, truly uninitialized memory like what gets returned here
@ -521,6 +523,8 @@ pub unsafe fn zeroed<T>() -> T {
/// until they are, it is advisable to avoid them.)
///
/// [`MaybeUninit<T>`]: union.MaybeUninit.html
/// [uninit]: union.MaybeUninit.html#method.uninit
/// [assume_init]: union.MaybeUninit.html#method.assume_init
/// [inv]: union.MaybeUninit.html#initialization-invariant
#[inline]
#[rustc_deprecated(since = "1.39.0", reason = "use `mem::MaybeUninit` instead")]