OpenE2K/rust
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rollup merge of #34770 - davidko:patch-1, r=steveklabnik

Browse Source 
Fixed some typos

I believe these are typos?
This commit is contained in:
Guillaume Gomez 2016-07-12 12:08:24 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 23d5f5652c
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/doc/book/closures.md
View File

@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ could annotate it on the function declaration:
```rust,ignore
fn call_with_ref<'a, F>(some_closure:F) -> i32
where F: Fn(&'a 32) -> i32 {
where F: Fn(&'a i32) -> i32 {
```
However this presents a problem with in our case. When you specify the explicit
@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ of the closure we can use Higher-Ranked Trait Bounds with the `for<...>` syntax:
```ignore
fn call_with_ref<F>(some_closure:F) -> i32
where F: for<'a> Fn(&'a 32) -> i32 {
where F: for<'a> Fn(&'a i32) -> i32 {
```
This lets the Rust compiler find the minimum lifetime to invoke our closure and