Fix a comment that only made sense in the context of a dataflow based mutability check

This commit is contained in:
oli 2021-01-16 17:31:22 +00:00
parent b217fab960
commit 3cd0b46bac

View File

@ -9,9 +9,8 @@ const A: *const i32 = &4;
// as that would be an enormous footgun in oli-obk's opinion.
const B: *mut i32 = &mut 4; //~ ERROR mutable references are not allowed
// Could be ok, but the same analysis that prevents the mutable one above will also bail out here
// Using a block with some complex content, because just `&45` would get promoted,
// which is not what we want to test here.
// Ok, because no references to mutable data exist here, since the `{}` moves
// its value and then takes a reference to that.
const C: *const i32 = &{
let mut x = 42;
x += 3;