From 43ef5ad18410da5f50efc78fbb781f4e1037b02a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: blake2-ppc <blake2-ppc>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 20:00:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] std::select: Use correct indices from the front

Caught a bug where .enumerate() was used on a reverse iterator. The
indices should be counted from the front here (bblum confirms).
---
 src/libstd/select.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/libstd/select.rs b/src/libstd/select.rs
index d0afeb4be85..9f4fd8db788 100644
--- a/src/libstd/select.rs
+++ b/src/libstd/select.rs
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 use cell::Cell;
 use comm;
 use container::Container;
-use iterator::Iterator;
+use iterator::{Iterator, DoubleEndedIterator};
 use option::*;
 // use either::{Either, Left, Right};
 // use rt::kill::BlockedTask;
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ pub fn select<A: Select>(ports: &mut [A]) -> uint {
     // Task resumes. Now unblock ourselves from all the ports we blocked on.
     // If the success index wasn't reset, 'take' will just take all of them.
     // Iterate in reverse so the 'earliest' index that's ready gets returned.
-    for (index, port) in ports.mut_slice(0, ready_index).mut_rev_iter().enumerate() {
+    for (index, port) in ports.mut_slice(0, ready_index).mut_iter().enumerate().invert() {
         if port.unblock_from() {
             ready_index = index;
         }