rustc: selectively trans branches for `if <literal-bool>`.

That is, the `b` branch in `if true { a } else { b }` will not be
trans'd, and that expression will be exactly the same as `a`. This
means that, for example, macros conditionally expanding to `if false
{ .. }` (like debug!) will not waste time in LLVM (or trans).
This commit is contained in:
Huon Wilson 2013-07-17 03:13:41 -05:00
parent e252277fe9
commit 4797dd4087
1 changed files with 55 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -63,6 +63,38 @@ pub fn trans_if(bcx: block,
let _indenter = indenter();
let _icx = push_ctxt("trans_if");
match cond.node {
// `if true` and `if false` can be trans'd more efficiently,
// by dropping branches that are known to be impossible.
ast::expr_lit(@ref l) => match l.node {
ast::lit_bool(true) => {
// if true { .. } [else { .. }]
let then_bcx_in = scope_block(bcx, thn.info(), "if_true_then");
let then_bcx_out = trans_block(then_bcx_in, thn, dest);
let then_bcx_out = trans_block_cleanups(then_bcx_out,
block_cleanups(then_bcx_in));
Br(bcx, then_bcx_in.llbb);
return then_bcx_out;
}
ast::lit_bool(false) => {
match els {
// if false { .. } else { .. }
Some(elexpr) => {
let (else_bcx_in, else_bcx_out) =
trans_if_else(bcx, elexpr, dest, "if_false_else");
Br(bcx, else_bcx_in.llbb);
return else_bcx_out;
}
// if false { .. }
None => return bcx,
}
}
_ => {}
},
_ => {}
}
let Result {bcx, val: cond_val} =
expr::trans_to_datum(bcx, cond).to_result();
@ -80,22 +112,8 @@ pub fn trans_if(bcx: block,
// 'else' context
let (else_bcx_in, next_bcx) = match els {
Some(elexpr) => {
let else_bcx_in = scope_block(bcx, els.info(), "else");
let else_bcx_out = match elexpr.node {
ast::expr_if(_, _, _) => {
let elseif_blk = ast_util::block_from_expr(elexpr);
trans_block(else_bcx_in, &elseif_blk, dest)
}
ast::expr_block(ref blk) => {
trans_block(else_bcx_in, blk, dest)
}
// would be nice to have a constraint on ifs
_ => bcx.tcx().sess.bug("strange alternative in if")
};
let else_bcx_out = trans_block_cleanups(else_bcx_out,
block_cleanups(else_bcx_in));
(else_bcx_in, join_blocks(bcx, [then_bcx_out, else_bcx_out]))
let (else_bcx_in, else_bcx_out) = trans_if_else(bcx, elexpr, dest, "else");
(else_bcx_in, join_blocks(bcx, [then_bcx_out, else_bcx_out]))
}
_ => {
let next_bcx = sub_block(bcx, "next");
@ -109,7 +127,27 @@ pub fn trans_if(bcx: block,
then_bcx_in.to_str(), else_bcx_in.to_str());
CondBr(bcx, cond_val, then_bcx_in.llbb, else_bcx_in.llbb);
next_bcx
return next_bcx;
// trans `else [ if { .. } ... | { .. } ]`
fn trans_if_else(bcx: block, elexpr: @ast::expr,
dest: expr::Dest, scope_name: &str) -> (block, block) {
let else_bcx_in = scope_block(bcx, elexpr.info(), scope_name);
let else_bcx_out = match elexpr.node {
ast::expr_if(_, _, _) => {
let elseif_blk = ast_util::block_from_expr(elexpr);
trans_block(else_bcx_in, &elseif_blk, dest)
}
ast::expr_block(ref blk) => {
trans_block(else_bcx_in, blk, dest)
}
// would be nice to have a constraint on ifs
_ => bcx.tcx().sess.bug("strange alternative in if")
};
let else_bcx_out = trans_block_cleanups(else_bcx_out,
block_cleanups(else_bcx_in));
(else_bcx_in, else_bcx_out)
}
}
pub fn join_blocks(parent_bcx: block, in_cxs: &[block]) -> block {