Deja vu all over again. Something makes me think this is a usability hazard.

This commit is contained in:
Graydon Hoare 2010-07-02 17:14:46 -07:00
parent 233be40e25
commit 50e75e049b

View File

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ type call =
;; ;;
let need_ty_fn ty = let need_ty_fn ty =
match ty with match simplified_ty ty with
Ast.TY_fn tfn -> tfn Ast.TY_fn tfn -> tfn
| _ -> bug () "need fn" | _ -> bug () "need fn"
;; ;;
@ -2242,7 +2242,7 @@ let trans_visitor
and get_tydesc (idopt:node_id option) (ty:Ast.ty) : Il.cell = and get_tydesc (idopt:node_id option) (ty:Ast.ty) : Il.cell =
log cx "getting tydesc for %a" Ast.sprintf_ty ty; log cx "getting tydesc for %a" Ast.sprintf_ty ty;
match ty with match simplified_ty ty with
Ast.TY_param (idx, _) -> Ast.TY_param (idx, _) ->
(get_ty_param_in_current_frame idx) (get_ty_param_in_current_frame idx)
| t when has_parametric_types t -> | t when has_parametric_types t ->
@ -2438,6 +2438,7 @@ let trans_visitor
(curr_iso:Ast.ty_iso option) (curr_iso:Ast.ty_iso option)
: unit = : unit =
let ty = strip_mutable_or_constrained_ty ty in
let ty = maybe_iso curr_iso ty in let ty = maybe_iso curr_iso ty in
let curr_iso = maybe_enter_iso ty curr_iso in let curr_iso = maybe_enter_iso ty curr_iso in
let mctrl = ty_mem_ctrl ty in let mctrl = ty_mem_ctrl ty in
@ -2556,8 +2557,9 @@ let trans_visitor
mov c zero; mov c zero;
patch null_jmp patch null_jmp
in in
let ty = strip_mutable_or_constrained_ty ty in
match strip_mutable_or_constrained_ty ty with match ty with
Ast.TY_fn _ Ast.TY_fn _
| Ast.TY_obj _ -> | Ast.TY_obj _ ->
if type_has_state ty if type_has_state ty
@ -2662,6 +2664,7 @@ let trans_visitor
(ty:Ast.ty) (ty:Ast.ty)
(curr_iso:Ast.ty_iso option) (curr_iso:Ast.ty_iso option)
: unit = : unit =
let ty = strip_mutable_or_constrained_ty ty in
match ty_mem_ctrl ty with match ty_mem_ctrl ty with
MEM_gc -> MEM_gc ->
let tmp = next_vreg_cell Il.voidptr_t in let tmp = next_vreg_cell Il.voidptr_t in