From 75c79bdb0204271e09220c4c59239bb85772ee93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryan Cumming Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:14:12 +1100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix ICE on const eval of union field MIR's `Const::get_field()` attempts to retrieve the value for a given field in a constant. In the case of a union constant it was falling through to a generic `const_get_elt` based on the field index. As union fields don't have an index this caused an ICE in `llvm_field_index`. Fix by simply returning the current value when accessing any field in a union. This works because all union fields start at byte offset 0. The added test uses `const_fn` it ensure the field is extracted using MIR's const evaluation. The crash is reproducible without it, however. Fixes #47788 --- src/librustc_trans/mir/constant.rs | 5 +++- .../run-pass/union/union-const-eval-field.rs | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/test/run-pass/union/union-const-eval-field.rs diff --git a/src/librustc_trans/mir/constant.rs b/src/librustc_trans/mir/constant.rs index 71ce0aa3da9..f519e27dce9 100644 --- a/src/librustc_trans/mir/constant.rs +++ b/src/librustc_trans/mir/constant.rs @@ -140,7 +140,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Const<'tcx> { } } _ => { - const_get_elt(self.llval, layout.llvm_field_index(i)) + match layout.fields { + layout::FieldPlacement::Union(_) => self.llval, + _ => const_get_elt(self.llval, layout.llvm_field_index(i)), + } } } } diff --git a/src/test/run-pass/union/union-const-eval-field.rs b/src/test/run-pass/union/union-const-eval-field.rs new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a58b8bc34cd --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/run-pass/union/union-const-eval-field.rs @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +// Copyright 2018 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT +// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at +// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT. +// +// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 or the MIT license +// , at your +// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed +// except according to those terms. + +#![feature(const_fn)] + +union DummyUnion { + field1: i32, + field2: i32, +} + +const fn read_field() -> i32 { + const UNION: DummyUnion = DummyUnion { field1: 5 }; + const FIELD: i32 = unsafe { UNION.field2 }; + FIELD +} + +fn main() { + assert_eq!(read_field(), 5); +} From ed7e4e1e27d21d47b93f756e615b5cb750275c3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryan Cumming Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 14:18:18 +1100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Expand union test to include different types --- .../run-pass/union/union-const-eval-field.rs | 33 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/test/run-pass/union/union-const-eval-field.rs b/src/test/run-pass/union/union-const-eval-field.rs index a58b8bc34cd..f83f49f298b 100644 --- a/src/test/run-pass/union/union-const-eval-field.rs +++ b/src/test/run-pass/union/union-const-eval-field.rs @@ -10,17 +10,36 @@ #![feature(const_fn)] +type Field1 = i32; +type Field2 = f32; +type Field3 = i64; + union DummyUnion { - field1: i32, - field2: i32, + field1: Field1, + field2: Field2, + field3: Field3, } -const fn read_field() -> i32 { - const UNION: DummyUnion = DummyUnion { field1: 5 }; - const FIELD: i32 = unsafe { UNION.field2 }; - FIELD +const FLOAT1_AS_I32: i32 = 1065353216; +const UNION: DummyUnion = DummyUnion { field1: FLOAT1_AS_I32 }; + +const fn read_field1() -> Field1 { + const FIELD1: Field1 = unsafe { UNION.field1 }; + FIELD1 +} + +const fn read_field2() -> Field2 { + const FIELD2: Field2 = unsafe { UNION.field2 }; + FIELD2 +} + +const fn read_field3() -> Field3 { + const FIELD3: Field3 = unsafe { UNION.field3 }; + FIELD3 } fn main() { - assert_eq!(read_field(), 5); + assert_eq!(read_field1(), FLOAT1_AS_I32); + assert_eq!(read_field2(), 1.0); + assert_eq!(read_field3(), unsafe { UNION.field3 }); }