OpenE2K
/
rust
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix safety comment 

The size assertion in the comment was inverted compared to the code. After fixing that the implication that `(new_size >= old_size) => new_size != 0` still doesn't hold so explain why `old_size != 0` at this point.
This commit is contained in:
LingMan 2021-01-07 09:13:21 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent dfdfaa1f04
commit 769fb8a8b7
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
library/std/src/alloc.rs
View File

@ -166,8 +166,9 @@ impl System {
match old_layout.size() {
0 => self.alloc_impl(new_layout, zeroed),
// SAFETY: `new_size` is non-zero as `old_size` is greater than or equal to `new_size`
// as required by safety conditions. Other conditions must be upheld by the caller
// SAFETY: `new_size` is non-zero as `new_size` is greater than or equal to `old_size`
// as required by safety conditions and the `old_size == 0` case was handled in the
// previous match arm. Other conditions must be upheld by the caller
old_size if old_layout.align() == new_layout.align() => unsafe {
let new_size = new_layout.size();