OpenE2K/rust
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

rollup merge of #20332: js-ojus/master

Browse Source 
In the context of explaining the declaration of mutable bindings, using 'intended' probably conveys the meaning better than 'cared'.
This commit is contained in:
Alex Crichton 2014-12-30 16:26:20 -08:00
commit 86a03b8685
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/doc/guide.md
View File

@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ x = 10i;
There is no single reason that bindings are immutable by default, but we can There is no single reason that bindings are immutable by default, but we can
think about it through one of Rust's primary focuses: safety. If you forget to think about it through one of Rust's primary focuses: safety. If you forget to
say `mut`, the compiler will catch it, and let you know that you have mutated say `mut`, the compiler will catch it, and let you know that you have mutated
something you may not have cared to mutate. If bindings were mutable by something you may not have intended to mutate. If bindings were mutable by
default, the compiler would not be able to tell you this. If you _did_ intend default, the compiler would not be able to tell you this. If you _did_ intend
mutation, then the solution is quite easy: add `mut`. mutation, then the solution is quite easy: add `mut`.