Remove mentions of unstable sort_by_cached key from stable documentation
This commit is contained in:
parent
eca1e18cd7
commit
9c7b69e179
@ -1306,10 +1306,6 @@ impl<T> [T] {
|
||||
/// This sort is stable (i.e. does not reorder equal elements) and `O(m n log(m n))`
|
||||
/// worst-case, where the key function is `O(m)`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// For expensive key functions (e.g. functions that are not simple property accesses or
|
||||
/// basic operations), [`sort_by_cached_key`](#method.sort_by_cached_key) is likely to be
|
||||
/// significantly faster, as it does not recompute element keys.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// When applicable, unstable sorting is preferred because it is generally faster than stable
|
||||
/// sorting and it doesn't allocate auxiliary memory.
|
||||
/// See [`sort_unstable_by_key`](#method.sort_unstable_by_key).
|
||||
@ -1496,10 +1492,6 @@ impl<T> [T] {
|
||||
/// randomization to avoid degenerate cases, but with a fixed seed to always provide
|
||||
/// deterministic behavior.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Due to its key calling strategy, [`sort_unstable_by_key`](#method.sort_unstable_by_key)
|
||||
/// is likely to be slower than [`sort_by_cached_key`](#method.sort_by_cached_key) in
|
||||
/// cases where the key function is expensive.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # Examples
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ```
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user