Use the span of #[derive_Eq]
for #[structural_match]
This commit is contained in:
parent
40f047dc7a
commit
a0e606c380
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ fn expand_derive(cx: &mut ExtCtxt,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut found_partial_eq = false;
|
||||
let mut found_eq = false;
|
||||
let mut eq_span = None;
|
||||
|
||||
for titem in traits.iter().rev() {
|
||||
let tname = match titem.node {
|
||||
@ -114,12 +114,6 @@ fn expand_derive(cx: &mut ExtCtxt,
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if &tname[..] == "Eq" {
|
||||
found_eq = true;
|
||||
} else if &tname[..] == "PartialEq" {
|
||||
found_partial_eq = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let span = Span {
|
||||
expn_id: cx.codemap().record_expansion(codemap::ExpnInfo {
|
||||
call_site: titem.span,
|
||||
@ -131,6 +125,12 @@ fn expand_derive(cx: &mut ExtCtxt,
|
||||
}), ..titem.span
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if &tname[..] == "Eq" {
|
||||
eq_span = Some(span);
|
||||
} else if &tname[..] == "PartialEq" {
|
||||
found_partial_eq = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// #[derive(Foo, Bar)] expands to #[derive_Foo] #[derive_Bar]
|
||||
item.attrs.push(cx.attribute(span, cx.meta_word(titem.span,
|
||||
intern_and_get_ident(&format!("derive_{}", tname)))));
|
||||
@ -138,41 +138,13 @@ fn expand_derive(cx: &mut ExtCtxt,
|
||||
|
||||
// RFC #1445. `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]` adds a (trusted)
|
||||
// `#[structural_match]` attribute.
|
||||
if found_partial_eq && found_eq {
|
||||
// This span is **very** sensitive and crucial to
|
||||
// getting the stability behavior we want. What we are
|
||||
// doing is marking `#[structural_match]` with the
|
||||
// span of the `#[deriving(...)]` attribute (the
|
||||
// entire attribute, not just the `PartialEq` or `Eq`
|
||||
// part), but with the current backtrace. The current
|
||||
// backtrace will contain a topmost entry that IS this
|
||||
// `#[deriving(...)]` attribute and with the
|
||||
// "allow-unstable" flag set to true.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that we do NOT use the span of the `Eq`
|
||||
// text itself. You might think this is
|
||||
// equivalent, because the `Eq` appears within the
|
||||
// `#[deriving(Eq)]` attribute, and hence we would
|
||||
// inherit the "allows unstable" from the
|
||||
// backtrace. But in fact this is not always the
|
||||
// case. The actual source text that led to
|
||||
// deriving can be `#[$attr]`, for example, where
|
||||
// `$attr == deriving(Eq)`. In that case, the
|
||||
// "#[structural_match]" would be considered to
|
||||
// originate not from the deriving call but from
|
||||
// text outside the deriving call, and hence would
|
||||
// be forbidden from using unstable
|
||||
// content.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// See tests src/run-pass/rfc1445 for
|
||||
// examples. --nmatsakis
|
||||
let span = Span { expn_id: cx.backtrace(), .. span };
|
||||
assert!(cx.parse_sess.codemap().span_allows_unstable(span));
|
||||
debug!("inserting structural_match with span {:?}", span);
|
||||
let structural_match = intern_and_get_ident("structural_match");
|
||||
item.attrs.push(cx.attribute(span,
|
||||
cx.meta_word(span,
|
||||
structural_match)));
|
||||
if let Some(eq_span) = eq_span {
|
||||
if found_partial_eq {
|
||||
let structural_match = intern_and_get_ident("structural_match");
|
||||
item.attrs.push(cx.attribute(eq_span,
|
||||
cx.meta_word(eq_span,
|
||||
structural_match)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
item
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user