const evaluatable: improve TooGeneric
handling
This commit is contained in:
parent
535d27ac9a
commit
a4783debe0
@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ use rustc_session::lint;
|
||||
use rustc_span::def_id::{DefId, LocalDefId};
|
||||
use rustc_span::Span;
|
||||
|
||||
use std::cmp;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Check if a given constant can be evaluated.
|
||||
pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
def: ty::WithOptConstParam<DefId>,
|
||||
@ -32,24 +35,88 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
||||
) -> Result<(), ErrorHandled> {
|
||||
debug!("is_const_evaluatable({:?}, {:?})", def, substs);
|
||||
if infcx.tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked {
|
||||
if let Some(ct) = AbstractConst::new(infcx.tcx, def, substs)? {
|
||||
for pred in param_env.caller_bounds() {
|
||||
match pred.skip_binders() {
|
||||
ty::PredicateAtom::ConstEvaluatable(b_def, b_substs) => {
|
||||
debug!("is_const_evaluatable: caller_bound={:?}, {:?}", b_def, b_substs);
|
||||
if b_def == def && b_substs == substs {
|
||||
debug!("is_const_evaluatable: caller_bound ~~> ok");
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
} else if AbstractConst::new(infcx.tcx, b_def, b_substs)?
|
||||
.map_or(false, |b_ct| try_unify(infcx.tcx, ct, b_ct))
|
||||
{
|
||||
debug!("is_const_evaluatable: abstract_const ~~> ok");
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
|
||||
match AbstractConst::new(tcx, def, substs)? {
|
||||
// We are looking at a generic abstract constant.
|
||||
Some(ct) => {
|
||||
for pred in param_env.caller_bounds() {
|
||||
match pred.skip_binders() {
|
||||
ty::PredicateAtom::ConstEvaluatable(b_def, b_substs) => {
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
"is_const_evaluatable: caller_bound={:?}, {:?}",
|
||||
b_def, b_substs
|
||||
);
|
||||
if b_def == def && b_substs == substs {
|
||||
debug!("is_const_evaluatable: caller_bound ~~> ok");
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
} else if AbstractConst::new(tcx, b_def, b_substs)?
|
||||
.map_or(false, |b_ct| try_unify(tcx, ct, b_ct))
|
||||
{
|
||||
debug!("is_const_evaluatable: abstract_const ~~> ok");
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {} // don't care
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We were unable to unify the abstract constant with
|
||||
// a constant found in the caller bounds, there are
|
||||
// now three possible cases here.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// - The substs are concrete enough that we can simply
|
||||
// try and evaluate the given constant.
|
||||
// - The abstract const still references an inference
|
||||
// variable, in this case we return `TooGeneric`.
|
||||
// - The abstract const references a generic parameter,
|
||||
// this means that we emit an error here.
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
|
||||
enum FailureKind {
|
||||
MentionsInfer,
|
||||
MentionsParam,
|
||||
Concrete,
|
||||
}
|
||||
let mut failure_kind = FailureKind::Concrete;
|
||||
walk_abstract_const(tcx, ct, |node| match node {
|
||||
Node::Leaf(leaf) => {
|
||||
let leaf = leaf.subst(tcx, ct.substs);
|
||||
if leaf.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
|
||||
failure_kind = FailureKind::MentionsInfer;
|
||||
} else if leaf.has_param_types_or_consts() {
|
||||
failure_kind = cmp::min(failure_kind, FailureKind::MentionsParam);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {} // don't care
|
||||
Node::Binop(_, _, _) | Node::UnaryOp(_, _) | Node::FunctionCall(_, _) => (),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
match failure_kind {
|
||||
FailureKind::MentionsInfer => {
|
||||
return Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric);
|
||||
}
|
||||
FailureKind::MentionsParam => {
|
||||
// FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): Better error message.
|
||||
infcx
|
||||
.tcx
|
||||
.sess
|
||||
.struct_span_err(span, "unconstrained generic constant")
|
||||
.span_help(
|
||||
tcx.def_span(def.did),
|
||||
"consider adding a `where` bound for this expression",
|
||||
)
|
||||
.emit();
|
||||
return Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(ErrorReported));
|
||||
}
|
||||
FailureKind::Concrete => {
|
||||
// Dealt with below by the same code which handles this
|
||||
// without the feature gate.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
None => {
|
||||
// If we are dealing with a concrete constant, we can
|
||||
// reuse the old code path and try to evaluate
|
||||
// the constant.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -95,7 +162,36 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
debug!(?concrete, "is_const_evaluatable");
|
||||
concrete.map(drop)
|
||||
match concrete {
|
||||
Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric) if !substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() => {
|
||||
// FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We really should move
|
||||
// emitting this error message to fulfill instead. For
|
||||
// now this is easier.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This is not a problem without `const_evaluatable_checked` as
|
||||
// all `ConstEvaluatable` predicates have to be fulfilled for compilation
|
||||
// to succeed.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// @lcnr: We already emit an error for things like
|
||||
// `fn test<const N: usize>() -> [0 - N]` eagerly here,
|
||||
// so until we fix this I don't really care.
|
||||
|
||||
let mut err = infcx
|
||||
.tcx
|
||||
.sess
|
||||
.struct_span_err(span, "constant expression depends on a generic parameter");
|
||||
// FIXME(const_generics): we should suggest to the user how they can resolve this
|
||||
// issue. However, this is currently not actually possible
|
||||
// (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66962#issuecomment-575907083).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that with `feature(const_evaluatable_checked)` this case should not
|
||||
// be reachable.
|
||||
err.note("this may fail depending on what value the parameter takes");
|
||||
err.emit();
|
||||
Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(ErrorReported))
|
||||
}
|
||||
c => c.map(drop),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A tree representing an anonymous constant.
|
||||
@ -421,6 +517,33 @@ pub(super) fn try_unify_abstract_consts<'tcx>(
|
||||
// on `ErrorReported`.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn walk_abstract_const<'tcx, F>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, ct: AbstractConst<'tcx>, mut f: F)
|
||||
where
|
||||
F: FnMut(Node<'tcx>),
|
||||
{
|
||||
recurse(tcx, ct, &mut f);
|
||||
fn recurse<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, ct: AbstractConst<'tcx>, f: &mut dyn FnMut(Node<'tcx>)) {
|
||||
let root = ct.root();
|
||||
f(root);
|
||||
match root {
|
||||
Node::Leaf(_) => (),
|
||||
Node::Binop(_, l, r) => {
|
||||
recurse(tcx, ct.subtree(l), f);
|
||||
recurse(tcx, ct.subtree(r), f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Node::UnaryOp(_, v) => {
|
||||
recurse(tcx, ct.subtree(v), f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Node::FunctionCall(func, args) => {
|
||||
recurse(tcx, ct.subtree(func), f);
|
||||
for &arg in args {
|
||||
recurse(tcx, ct.subtree(arg), f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Tries to unify two abstract constants using structural equality.
|
||||
pub(super) fn try_unify<'tcx>(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
|
@ -745,25 +745,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxtExt<'tcx> for InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
let violations = self.tcx.object_safety_violations(did);
|
||||
report_object_safety_error(self.tcx, span, did, violations)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ConstEvalFailure(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric) => {
|
||||
// In this instance, we have a const expression containing an unevaluated
|
||||
// generic parameter. We have no idea whether this expression is valid or
|
||||
// not (e.g. it might result in an error), but we don't want to just assume
|
||||
// that it's okay, because that might result in post-monomorphisation time
|
||||
// errors. The onus is really on the caller to provide values that it can
|
||||
// prove are well-formed.
|
||||
let mut err = self
|
||||
.tcx
|
||||
.sess
|
||||
.struct_span_err(span, "constant expression depends on a generic parameter");
|
||||
// FIXME(const_generics): we should suggest to the user how they can resolve this
|
||||
// issue. However, this is currently not actually possible
|
||||
// (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66962#issuecomment-575907083).
|
||||
err.note("this may fail depending on what value the parameter takes");
|
||||
err
|
||||
bug!("too generic should have been handled in `is_const_evaluatable`");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Already reported in the query.
|
||||
ConstEvalFailure(ErrorHandled::Reported(ErrorReported)) => {
|
||||
// FIXME(eddyb) remove this once `ErrorReported` becomes a proof token.
|
||||
|
@ -496,6 +496,13 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> FulfillProcessor<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
|
||||
obligation.cause.span,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
Ok(()) => ProcessResult::Changed(vec![]),
|
||||
Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric) => {
|
||||
pending_obligation.stalled_on = substs
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter_map(|ty| TyOrConstInferVar::maybe_from_generic_arg(ty))
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
ProcessResult::Unchanged
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(e) => ProcessResult::Error(CodeSelectionError(ConstEvalFailure(e))),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -537,8 +544,10 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> FulfillProcessor<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
|
||||
Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric) => {
|
||||
stalled_on.append(
|
||||
&mut substs
|
||||
.types()
|
||||
.filter_map(|ty| TyOrConstInferVar::maybe_from_ty(ty))
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter_map(|arg| {
|
||||
TyOrConstInferVar::maybe_from_generic_arg(arg)
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric)
|
||||
|
@ -5,10 +5,10 @@ extern crate const_evaluatable_lib;
|
||||
|
||||
fn user<T>() {
|
||||
let _ = const_evaluatable_lib::test1::<T>();
|
||||
//~^ ERROR constant expression depends
|
||||
//~| ERROR constant expression depends
|
||||
//~| ERROR constant expression depends
|
||||
//~| ERROR constant expression depends
|
||||
//~^ ERROR unconstrained generic constant
|
||||
//~| ERROR unconstrained generic constant
|
||||
//~| ERROR unconstrained generic constant
|
||||
//~| ERROR unconstrained generic constant
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {}
|
||||
|
@ -1,54 +1,50 @@
|
||||
error: constant expression depends on a generic parameter
|
||||
error: unconstrained generic constant
|
||||
--> $DIR/cross_crate_predicate.rs:7:13
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | let _ = const_evaluatable_lib::test1::<T>();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
::: $DIR/auxiliary/const_evaluatable_lib.rs:6:10
|
||||
|
|
||||
help: consider adding a `where` bound for this expression
|
||||
--> $DIR/auxiliary/const_evaluatable_lib.rs:6:10
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | [u8; std::mem::size_of::<T>() - 1]: Sized,
|
||||
| ---------------------------- required by this bound in `test1`
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: this may fail depending on what value the parameter takes
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: constant expression depends on a generic parameter
|
||||
error: unconstrained generic constant
|
||||
--> $DIR/cross_crate_predicate.rs:7:13
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | let _ = const_evaluatable_lib::test1::<T>();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
::: $DIR/auxiliary/const_evaluatable_lib.rs:4:27
|
||||
|
|
||||
help: consider adding a `where` bound for this expression
|
||||
--> $DIR/auxiliary/const_evaluatable_lib.rs:4:27
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | pub fn test1<T>() -> [u8; std::mem::size_of::<T>() - 1]
|
||||
| ---------------------------- required by this bound in `test1`
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: this may fail depending on what value the parameter takes
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: constant expression depends on a generic parameter
|
||||
error: unconstrained generic constant
|
||||
--> $DIR/cross_crate_predicate.rs:7:13
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | let _ = const_evaluatable_lib::test1::<T>();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
::: $DIR/auxiliary/const_evaluatable_lib.rs:6:10
|
||||
|
|
||||
help: consider adding a `where` bound for this expression
|
||||
--> $DIR/auxiliary/const_evaluatable_lib.rs:6:10
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | [u8; std::mem::size_of::<T>() - 1]: Sized,
|
||||
| ---------------------------- required by this bound in `test1`
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: this may fail depending on what value the parameter takes
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: constant expression depends on a generic parameter
|
||||
error: unconstrained generic constant
|
||||
--> $DIR/cross_crate_predicate.rs:7:13
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | let _ = const_evaluatable_lib::test1::<T>();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
::: $DIR/auxiliary/const_evaluatable_lib.rs:4:27
|
||||
|
|
||||
help: consider adding a `where` bound for this expression
|
||||
--> $DIR/auxiliary/const_evaluatable_lib.rs:4:27
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | pub fn test1<T>() -> [u8; std::mem::size_of::<T>() - 1]
|
||||
| ---------------------------- required by this bound in `test1`
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: this may fail depending on what value the parameter takes
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 4 previous errors
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
||||
// run-pass
|
||||
#![feature(const_generics, const_evaluatable_checked)]
|
||||
#![allow(incomplete_features)]
|
||||
|
||||
use std::{mem, ptr};
|
||||
|
||||
fn split_first<T, const N: usize>(arr: [T; N]) -> (T, [T; N - 1])
|
||||
where
|
||||
[T; N - 1]: Sized,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let arr = mem::ManuallyDrop::new(arr);
|
||||
unsafe {
|
||||
let head = ptr::read(&arr[0]);
|
||||
let tail = ptr::read(&arr[1..] as *const [T] as *const [T; N - 1]);
|
||||
(head, tail)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
let arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4];
|
||||
let (head, tail) = split_first(arr);
|
||||
assert_eq!(head, 0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(tail, [1, 2, 3, 4]);
|
||||
}
|
@ -14,5 +14,4 @@ fn test<T, const P: usize>() where Bool<{core::mem::size_of::<T>() > 4}>: True {
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
test::<2>();
|
||||
//~^ ERROR wrong number of type
|
||||
//~| ERROR constant expression depends
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -4,17 +4,6 @@ error[E0107]: wrong number of type arguments: expected 1, found 0
|
||||
LL | test::<2>();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^ expected 1 type argument
|
||||
|
||||
error: constant expression depends on a generic parameter
|
||||
--> $DIR/issue-76595.rs:15:5
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | fn test<T, const P: usize>() where Bool<{core::mem::size_of::<T>() > 4}>: True {
|
||||
| ------------------------------- required by this bound in `test`
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | test::<2>();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: this may fail depending on what value the parameter takes
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
|
||||
error: aborting due to previous error
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0107`.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user