Reimplement the map_clone
lint from scratch
This commit is contained in:
parent
057243f16b
commit
b36bb0a68d
@ -688,8 +688,6 @@ All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
|
||||
[`float_arithmetic`]: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#float_arithmetic
|
||||
[`float_cmp`]: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#float_cmp
|
||||
[`float_cmp_const`]: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#float_cmp_const
|
||||
[`fn_to_numeric_cast`]: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#fn_to_numeric_cast
|
||||
[`fn_to_numeric_cast_with_truncation`]: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#fn_to_numeric_cast_with_truncation
|
||||
[`for_kv_map`]: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#for_kv_map
|
||||
[`for_loop_over_option`]: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#for_loop_over_option
|
||||
[`for_loop_over_result`]: https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#for_loop_over_result
|
||||
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ We are currently in the process of discussing Clippy 1.0 via the RFC process in
|
||||
|
||||
A collection of lints to catch common mistakes and improve your [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust) code.
|
||||
|
||||
[There are 279 lints included in this crate!](https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html)
|
||||
[There are 277 lints included in this crate!](https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html)
|
||||
|
||||
We have a bunch of lint categories to allow you to choose how much Clippy is supposed to ~~annoy~~ help you:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ pub mod let_if_seq;
|
||||
pub mod lifetimes;
|
||||
pub mod literal_representation;
|
||||
pub mod loops;
|
||||
pub mod map_clone;
|
||||
pub mod map_unit_fn;
|
||||
pub mod matches;
|
||||
pub mod mem_forget;
|
||||
@ -327,6 +328,7 @@ pub fn register_plugins(reg: &mut rustc_plugin::Registry<'_>, conf: &Conf) {
|
||||
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box strings::StringAdd);
|
||||
reg.register_early_lint_pass(box returns::ReturnPass);
|
||||
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box methods::Pass);
|
||||
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box map_clone::Pass);
|
||||
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box shadow::Pass);
|
||||
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box types::LetPass);
|
||||
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box types::UnitCmp);
|
||||
@ -583,6 +585,7 @@ pub fn register_plugins(reg: &mut rustc_plugin::Registry<'_>, conf: &Conf) {
|
||||
loops::WHILE_IMMUTABLE_CONDITION,
|
||||
loops::WHILE_LET_LOOP,
|
||||
loops::WHILE_LET_ON_ITERATOR,
|
||||
map_clone::MAP_CLONE,
|
||||
map_unit_fn::OPTION_MAP_UNIT_FN,
|
||||
map_unit_fn::RESULT_MAP_UNIT_FN,
|
||||
matches::MATCH_AS_REF,
|
||||
@ -742,6 +745,7 @@ pub fn register_plugins(reg: &mut rustc_plugin::Registry<'_>, conf: &Conf) {
|
||||
loops::FOR_KV_MAP,
|
||||
loops::NEEDLESS_RANGE_LOOP,
|
||||
loops::WHILE_LET_ON_ITERATOR,
|
||||
map_clone::MAP_CLONE,
|
||||
matches::MATCH_BOOL,
|
||||
matches::MATCH_OVERLAPPING_ARM,
|
||||
matches::MATCH_REF_PATS,
|
||||
|
100
clippy_lints/src/map_clone.rs
Normal file
100
clippy_lints/src/map_clone.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
|
||||
use crate::rustc::hir;
|
||||
use crate::rustc::lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintArray, LintPass};
|
||||
use crate::rustc::{declare_tool_lint, lint_array};
|
||||
use crate::syntax::source_map::Span;
|
||||
use crate::utils::paths;
|
||||
use crate::utils::{
|
||||
in_macro, match_trait_method, match_type,
|
||||
remove_blocks, snippet,
|
||||
span_lint_and_sugg,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use if_chain::if_chain;
|
||||
use crate::syntax::ast::Ident;
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone)]
|
||||
pub struct Pass;
|
||||
|
||||
/// **What it does:** Checks for usage of `iterator.map(|x| x.clone())` and suggests
|
||||
/// `iterator.cloned()` instead
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// **Why is this bad?** Readability, this can be written more concisely
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// **Known problems:** None.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// **Example:**
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ```rust
|
||||
/// let x = vec![42, 43];
|
||||
/// let y = x.iter();
|
||||
/// let z = y.map(|i| *i);
|
||||
/// ```
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The correct use would be:
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ```rust
|
||||
/// let x = vec![42, 43];
|
||||
/// let y = x.iter();
|
||||
/// let z = y.cloned();
|
||||
/// ```
|
||||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||||
pub MAP_CLONE,
|
||||
style,
|
||||
"using `iterator.map(|x| x.clone())`, or dereferencing closures for `Copy` types"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl LintPass for Pass {
|
||||
fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray {
|
||||
lint_array!(MAP_CLONE)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for Pass {
|
||||
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'_, '_>, e: &hir::Expr) {
|
||||
if in_macro(e.span) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if_chain! {
|
||||
if let hir::ExprKind::MethodCall(ref method, _, ref args) = e.node;
|
||||
if args.len() == 2;
|
||||
if method.ident.as_str() == "map";
|
||||
let ty = cx.tables.expr_ty(&args[0]);
|
||||
if match_type(cx, ty, &paths::OPTION) || match_trait_method(cx, e, &paths::ITERATOR);
|
||||
if let hir::ExprKind::Closure(_, _, body_id, _, _) = args[1].node;
|
||||
let closure_body = cx.tcx.hir.body(body_id);
|
||||
let closure_expr = remove_blocks(&closure_body.value);
|
||||
then {
|
||||
match closure_body.arguments[0].pat.node {
|
||||
hir::PatKind::Ref(ref inner, _) => if let hir::PatKind::Binding(hir::BindingAnnotation::Unannotated, _, name, None) = inner.node {
|
||||
lint(cx, e.span, args[0].span, name, closure_expr);
|
||||
},
|
||||
hir::PatKind::Binding(hir::BindingAnnotation::Unannotated, _, name, None) => match closure_expr.node {
|
||||
hir::ExprKind::Unary(hir::UnOp::UnDeref, ref inner) => lint(cx, e.span, args[0].span, name, inner),
|
||||
hir::ExprKind::MethodCall(ref method, _, ref obj) => if method.ident.as_str() == "clone" {
|
||||
if match_trait_method(cx, closure_expr, &paths::CLONE_TRAIT) {
|
||||
lint(cx, e.span, args[0].span, name, &obj[0]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {},
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => {},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn lint(cx: &LateContext<'_, '_>, replace: Span, root: Span, name: Ident, path: &hir::Expr) {
|
||||
if let hir::ExprKind::Path(hir::QPath::Resolved(None, ref path)) = path.node {
|
||||
if path.segments.len() == 1 && path.segments[0].ident == name {
|
||||
span_lint_and_sugg(
|
||||
cx,
|
||||
MAP_CLONE,
|
||||
replace,
|
||||
"You are using an explicit closure for cloning elements",
|
||||
"Consider calling the dedicated `cloned` method",
|
||||
format!("{}.cloned()", snippet(cx, root, "..")),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
9
tests/ui/map_clone.rs
Normal file
9
tests/ui/map_clone.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
#![feature(tool_lints)]
|
||||
#![warn(clippy::all, clippy::pedantic)]
|
||||
#![allow(clippy::missing_docs_in_private_items)]
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
let _: Vec<i8> = vec![5_i8; 6].iter().map(|x| *x).collect();
|
||||
let _: Vec<String> = vec![String::new()].iter().map(|x| x.clone()).collect();
|
||||
let _: Vec<u32> = vec![42, 43].iter().map(|&x| x).collect();
|
||||
}
|
22
tests/ui/map_clone.stderr
Normal file
22
tests/ui/map_clone.stderr
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
error: You are using an explicit closure for cloning elements
|
||||
--> $DIR/map_clone.rs:6:22
|
||||
|
|
||||
6 | let _: Vec<i8> = vec![5_i8; 6].iter().map(|x| *x).collect();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: Consider calling the dedicated `cloned` method: `vec![5_i8; 6].iter().cloned()`
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: `-D clippy::map-clone` implied by `-D warnings`
|
||||
|
||||
error: You are using an explicit closure for cloning elements
|
||||
--> $DIR/map_clone.rs:7:26
|
||||
|
|
||||
7 | let _: Vec<String> = vec![String::new()].iter().map(|x| x.clone()).collect();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: Consider calling the dedicated `cloned` method: `vec![String::new()].iter().cloned()`
|
||||
|
||||
error: You are using an explicit closure for cloning elements
|
||||
--> $DIR/map_clone.rs:8:23
|
||||
|
|
||||
8 | let _: Vec<u32> = vec![42, 43].iter().map(|&x| x).collect();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: Consider calling the dedicated `cloned` method: `vec![42, 43].iter().cloned()`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user