clarify rules for ZST Boxes

This commit is contained in:
Ralf Jung 2020-10-12 10:08:25 +02:00
parent 06a079c43e
commit c555aabc5b
2 changed files with 14 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -62,6 +62,11 @@
//! T` obtained from [`Box::<T>::into_raw`] may be deallocated using the
//! [`Global`] allocator with [`Layout::for_value(&*value)`].
//!
//! For zero-sized values, the `Box` pointer still has to be [valid] for reads and writes and
//! sufficiently aligned. In particular, casting any aligned non-zero integer to a raw pointer
//! produces a valid pointer, but a pointer pointing into previously allocated memory that since got
//! freed is not valid.
//!
//! So long as `T: Sized`, a `Box<T>` is guaranteed to be represented
//! as a single pointer and is also ABI-compatible with C pointers
//! (i.e. the C type `T*`). This means that if you have extern "C"
@ -125,6 +130,7 @@
//! [`Global`]: crate::alloc::Global
//! [`Layout`]: crate::alloc::Layout
//! [`Layout::for_value(&*value)`]: crate::alloc::Layout::for_value
//! [valid]: ptr#safety
#![stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
@ -385,7 +391,10 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> Box<T> {
/// memory problems. For example, a double-free may occur if the
/// function is called twice on the same raw pointer.
///
/// The safety conditions are described in the [memory layout] section.
///
/// # Examples
///
/// Recreate a `Box` which was previously converted to a raw pointer
/// using [`Box::into_raw`]:
/// ```

View File

@ -16,12 +16,15 @@
//! provided at this point are very minimal:
//!
//! * A [null] pointer is *never* valid, not even for accesses of [size zero][zst].
//! * All pointers (except for the null pointer) are valid for all operations of
//! [size zero][zst].
//! * For a pointer to be valid, it is necessary, but not always sufficient, that the pointer
//! be *dereferenceable*: the memory range of the given size starting at the pointer must all be
//! within the bounds of a single allocated object. Note that in Rust,
//! every (stack-allocated) variable is considered a separate allocated object.
//! * Even for operations of [size zero][zst], the pointer must not be "dangling" in the sense of
//! pointing to deallocated memory. However, casting any non-zero integer to a pointer is valid
//! for zero-sized accesses. This corresponds to writing your own allocator; allocating zero-sized
//! objects is not very hard. In contrast, when you use the standard allocator, after memory got
//! deallocated, even zero-sized accesses to that memory are invalid.
//! * All accesses performed by functions in this module are *non-atomic* in the sense
//! of [atomic operations] used to synchronize between threads. This means it is
//! undefined behavior to perform two concurrent accesses to the same location from different