save-analysis: be a bit more defensive with field sub-expressions

Prevents an ice with `(...).f` since the sub-expression is in the AST but not the HIR.

We could actually do better in this specific case, but it doesn't seem worth it.
This commit is contained in:
Nick Cameron 2016-05-25 15:24:55 +12:00
parent dd6e8d45e1
commit c8ee3f2082

View File

@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ pub mod external_data;
pub mod span_utils;
use rustc::hir;
use rustc::hir::map::NodeItem;
use rustc::hir::map::{Node, NodeItem};
use rustc::hir::def::Def;
use rustc::hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc::session::config::CrateType::CrateTypeExecutable;
@ -392,7 +392,14 @@ impl<'l, 'tcx: 'l> SaveContext<'l, 'tcx> {
}
match expr.node {
ast::ExprKind::Field(ref sub_ex, ident) => {
let hir_node = self.tcx.map.expect_expr(sub_ex.id);
let hir_node = match self.tcx.map.find(sub_ex.id) {
Some(Node::NodeExpr(expr)) => expr,
_ => {
debug!("Missing or weird node for sub-expression {} in {:?}",
sub_ex.id, expr);
return None;
}
};
match self.tcx.expr_ty_adjusted(&hir_node).sty {
ty::TyStruct(def, _) => {
let f = def.struct_variant().field_named(ident.node.name);
@ -412,7 +419,6 @@ impl<'l, 'tcx: 'l> SaveContext<'l, 'tcx> {
}
}
ast::ExprKind::Struct(ref path, _, _) => {
let hir_node = self.tcx.map.expect_expr(expr.id);
match self.tcx.expr_ty_adjusted(&hir_node).sty {
ty::TyStruct(def, _) => {
let sub_span = self.span_utils.span_for_last_ident(path.span);