save-analysis: be a bit more defensive with field sub-expressions
Prevents an ice with `(...).f` since the sub-expression is in the AST but not the HIR. We could actually do better in this specific case, but it doesn't seem worth it.
This commit is contained in:
parent
dd6e8d45e1
commit
c8ee3f2082
@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ pub mod external_data;
|
||||
pub mod span_utils;
|
||||
|
||||
use rustc::hir;
|
||||
use rustc::hir::map::NodeItem;
|
||||
use rustc::hir::map::{Node, NodeItem};
|
||||
use rustc::hir::def::Def;
|
||||
use rustc::hir::def_id::DefId;
|
||||
use rustc::session::config::CrateType::CrateTypeExecutable;
|
||||
@ -392,7 +392,14 @@ impl<'l, 'tcx: 'l> SaveContext<'l, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
match expr.node {
|
||||
ast::ExprKind::Field(ref sub_ex, ident) => {
|
||||
let hir_node = self.tcx.map.expect_expr(sub_ex.id);
|
||||
let hir_node = match self.tcx.map.find(sub_ex.id) {
|
||||
Some(Node::NodeExpr(expr)) => expr,
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
debug!("Missing or weird node for sub-expression {} in {:?}",
|
||||
sub_ex.id, expr);
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
match self.tcx.expr_ty_adjusted(&hir_node).sty {
|
||||
ty::TyStruct(def, _) => {
|
||||
let f = def.struct_variant().field_named(ident.node.name);
|
||||
@ -412,7 +419,6 @@ impl<'l, 'tcx: 'l> SaveContext<'l, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ast::ExprKind::Struct(ref path, _, _) => {
|
||||
let hir_node = self.tcx.map.expect_expr(expr.id);
|
||||
match self.tcx.expr_ty_adjusted(&hir_node).sty {
|
||||
ty::TyStruct(def, _) => {
|
||||
let sub_span = self.span_utils.span_for_last_ident(path.span);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user