Rollup merge of #69192 - JohnTitor:add-tests, r=Centril

Add more regression tests

Closes #39618
Closes #51798
Closes #62894
Closes #63952
Closes #68653

r? @Centril

src/test/ui/consts/issue-63952.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// Regression test for #63952, shouldn't hang.
+
+use std::usize;
+
+#[repr(C)]
+#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
+struct SliceRepr {
+    ptr: *const u8,
+    len: usize,
+}
+
+union SliceTransmute {
+    repr: SliceRepr,
+    slice: &'static [u8],
+}
+
+// bad slice: length too big to even exist anywhere
+const SLICE_WAY_TOO_LONG: &[u8] = unsafe { //~ ERROR: it is undefined behavior to use this value
+    SliceTransmute {
+        repr: SliceRepr {
+            ptr: &42,
+            len: usize::MAX,
+        },
+    }
+    .slice
+};
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/consts/issue-63952.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+error[E0080]: it is undefined behavior to use this value
+  --> $DIR/issue-63952.rs:18:1
+   |
+LL | / const SLICE_WAY_TOO_LONG: &[u8] = unsafe {
+LL | |     SliceTransmute {
+LL | |         repr: SliceRepr {
+LL | |             ptr: &42,
+...  |
+LL | |     .slice
+LL | | };
+   | |__^ invalid slice: total size is bigger than largest supported object
+   |
+   = note: The rules on what exactly is undefined behavior aren't clear, so this check might be overzealous. Please open an issue on the rustc repository if you believe it should not be considered undefined behavior.
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`.

src/test/ui/generic-associated-types/issue-68653.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// A regression test for #68653, which was fixed by #68938.
+
+// check-pass
+
+#![allow(incomplete_features)]
+#![feature(generic_associated_types)]
+
+trait Fun {
+    type F<'a: 'a>;
+}
+
+impl <T> Fun for T {
+    type F<'a> = Self;
+}
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/issues/auxiliary/issue-51798.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+#![crate_type = "lib"]
+
+pub fn vec() -> Vec<u8> { vec![] }

src/test/ui/issues/issue-51798.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// edition:2018
+// aux-build:issue-51798.rs
+// check-pass
+
+extern crate issue_51798;
+
+mod server {
+    fn f() {
+        let mut v = issue_51798::vec();
+        v.clear();
+    }
+}
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/parser/issue-62894.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// Regression test for #62894, shouldn't crash.
+// error-pattern: this file contains an unclosed delimiter
+// error-pattern: expected one of `(`, `[`, or `{`, found keyword `fn`
+
+fn f() { assert_eq!(f(), (), assert_eq!(assert_eq!
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/parser/issue-62894.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+error: this file contains an unclosed delimiter
+  --> $DIR/issue-62894.rs:7:14
+   |
+LL | fn f() { assert_eq!(f(), (), assert_eq!(assert_eq!
+   |        -           -                   - unclosed delimiter
+   |        |           |
+   |        |           unclosed delimiter
+   |        unclosed delimiter
+LL | 
+LL | fn main() {}
+   |              ^
+
+error: this file contains an unclosed delimiter
+  --> $DIR/issue-62894.rs:7:14
+   |
+LL | fn f() { assert_eq!(f(), (), assert_eq!(assert_eq!
+   |        -           -                   - unclosed delimiter
+   |        |           |
+   |        |           unclosed delimiter
+   |        unclosed delimiter
+LL | 
+LL | fn main() {}
+   |              ^
+
+error: this file contains an unclosed delimiter
+  --> $DIR/issue-62894.rs:7:14
+   |
+LL | fn f() { assert_eq!(f(), (), assert_eq!(assert_eq!
+   |        -           -                   - unclosed delimiter
+   |        |           |
+   |        |           unclosed delimiter
+   |        unclosed delimiter
+LL | 
+LL | fn main() {}
+   |              ^
+
+error: expected one of `(`, `[`, or `{`, found keyword `fn`
+  --> $DIR/issue-62894.rs:7:1
+   |
+LL | fn f() { assert_eq!(f(), (), assert_eq!(assert_eq!
+   |                                                   - expected one of `(`, `[`, or `{`
+LL | 
+LL | fn main() {}
+   | ^^ unexpected token
+
+error: aborting due to 4 previous errors
+

src/test/ui/specialization/issue-39618.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// Regression test for #39618, shouldn't crash.
+// FIXME(JohnTitor): Centril pointed out this looks suspicions, we should revisit here.
+// More context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69192#discussion_r379846796
+
+// check-pass
+
+#![feature(specialization)]
+
+trait Foo {
+    fn foo(&self);
+}
+
+trait Bar {
+    fn bar(&self);
+}
+
+impl<T> Bar for T where T: Foo {
+    fn bar(&self) {}
+}
+
+impl<T> Foo for T where T: Bar {
+    fn foo(&self) {}
+}
+
+impl Foo for u64 {}
+
+fn main() {}