Rollup merge of #71350 - GuillaumeGomez:error-code-explanation-extra-check, r=oli-obk

Error code explanation extra check

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0060.md

@@ -2,12 +2,14 @@ External C functions are allowed to be variadic. However, a variadic function
 takes a minimum number of arguments. For example, consider C's variadic `printf`
 function:
 
-```
+```compile_fail,E0060
 use std::os::raw::{c_char, c_int};
 
 extern "C" {
     fn printf(_: *const c_char, ...) -> c_int;
 }
+
+unsafe { printf(); } // error!
 ```
 
 Using this declaration, it must be called with at least one argument, so

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0130.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ A pattern was declared as an argument in a foreign function declaration.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
-```compile_fail
+```compile_fail,E0130
 extern {
     fn foo((a, b): (u32, u32)); // error: patterns aren't allowed in foreign
                                 //        function declarations

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0198.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ A negative implementation was marked as unsafe.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
-```compile_fail
+```compile_fail,E0198
 struct Foo;
 
 unsafe impl !Clone for Foo { } // error!

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0202.md

@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
 Inherent associated types were part of [RFC 195] but are not yet implemented.
 See [the tracking issue][iss8995] for the status of this implementation.
 
+Erroneous code example:
+
+```compile_fail,E0202
+struct Foo;
+
+impl Foo {
+    type Bar = isize; // error!
+}
+```
+
 [RFC 195]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0195-associated-items.md
 [iss8995]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/8995

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0230.md

@@ -3,15 +3,11 @@ message for when a particular trait isn't implemented on a type placed in a
 position that needs that trait. For example, when the following code is
 compiled:
 
-```compile_fail
+```compile_fail,E0230
 #![feature(rustc_attrs)]
 
-fn foo<T: Index<u8>>(x: T){}
-
-#[rustc_on_unimplemented = "the type `{Self}` cannot be indexed by `{Idx}`"]
-trait Index<Idx> { /* ... */ }
-
-foo(true); // `bool` does not implement `Index<u8>`
+#[rustc_on_unimplemented = "error on `{Self}` with params `<{A},{B}>`"] // error
+trait BadAnnotation<A> {}
 ```
 
 There will be an error about `bool` not implementing `Index<u8>`, followed by a

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0231.md

@@ -3,15 +3,11 @@ message for when a particular trait isn't implemented on a type placed in a
 position that needs that trait. For example, when the following code is
 compiled:
 
-```compile_fail
+```compile_fail,E0231
 #![feature(rustc_attrs)]
 
-fn foo<T: Index<u8>>(x: T){}
-
-#[rustc_on_unimplemented = "the type `{Self}` cannot be indexed by `{Idx}`"]
-trait Index<Idx> { /* ... */ }
-
-foo(true); // `bool` does not implement `Index<u8>`
+#[rustc_on_unimplemented = "error on `{Self}` with params `<{A},{}>`"] // error!
+trait BadAnnotation<A> {}
 ```
 
 there will be an error about `bool` not implementing `Index<u8>`, followed by a

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0232.md

@@ -3,15 +3,11 @@ message for when a particular trait isn't implemented on a type placed in a
 position that needs that trait. For example, when the following code is
 compiled:
 
-```compile_fail
+```compile_fail,E0232
 #![feature(rustc_attrs)]
 
-fn foo<T: Index<u8>>(x: T){}
-
-#[rustc_on_unimplemented = "the type `{Self}` cannot be indexed by `{Idx}`"]
-trait Index<Idx> { /* ... */ }
-
-foo(true); // `bool` does not implement `Index<u8>`
+#[rustc_on_unimplemented(lorem="")] // error!
+trait BadAnnotation {}
 ```
 
 there will be an error about `bool` not implementing `Index<u8>`, followed by a

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0281.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ You tried to supply a type which doesn't implement some trait in a location
 which expected that trait. This error typically occurs when working with
 `Fn`-based types. Erroneous code example:
 
-```compile-fail
+```compile_fail
 fn foo<F: Fn(usize)>(x: F) { }
 
 fn main() {

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0364.md

@@ -3,27 +3,27 @@ attempted to `pub use` a type or value that was not itself public.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
-```compile_fail
-mod foo {
-    const X: u32 = 1;
+```compile_fail,E0364
+mod a {
+    fn foo() {}
+
+    mod a {
+        pub use super::foo; // error!
+    }
 }
-
-pub use foo::X;
-
-fn main() {}
 ```
 
 The solution to this problem is to ensure that the items that you are
 re-exporting are themselves marked with `pub`:
 
 ```
-mod foo {
-    pub const X: u32 = 1;
+mod a {
+    pub fn foo() {} // ok!
+
+    mod a {
+        pub use super::foo;
+    }
 }
-
-pub use foo::X;
-
-fn main() {}
 ```
 
 See the [Use Declarations][use-declarations] section of the reference for

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0378.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ or a newtype wrapper around a pointer.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
-```compile-fail,E0378
+```compile_fail,E0378
 #![feature(dispatch_from_dyn)]
 use std::ops::DispatchFromDyn;
 

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0590.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Example of erroneous code:
 
-```compile_fail
+```compile_fail,E0590
 while break {}
 ```
 

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0639.md

@@ -3,5 +3,17 @@ instantiated from outside of the defining crate as it has been marked
 as `non_exhaustive` and as such more fields/variants may be added in
 future that could cause adverse side effects for this code.
 
+Erroneous code example:
+
+```ignore (it only works cross-crate)
+#[non_exhaustive]
+pub struct NormalStruct {
+    pub first_field: u16,
+    pub second_field: u16,
+}
+
+let ns = NormalStruct { first_field: 640, second_field: 480 }; // error!
+```
+
 It is recommended that you look for a `new` function or equivalent in the
 crate's documentation.

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0644.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ A closure or generator was constructed that references its own type.
 
 Erroneous example:
 
-```compile-fail,E0644
+```compile_fail,E0644
 fn fix<F>(f: &F)
   where F: Fn(&F)
 {

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0658.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ An unstable feature was used.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
-```compile_fail,E658
+```compile_fail,E0658
 #[repr(u128)] // error: use of unstable library feature 'repr128'
 enum Foo {
     Bar(u64),

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0669.md

@@ -1,5 +1,17 @@
 Cannot convert inline assembly operand to a single LLVM value.
 
+Erroneous code example:
+
+```compile_fail,E0669
+#![feature(llvm_asm)]
+
+fn main() {
+    unsafe {
+        llvm_asm!("" :: "r"("")); // error!
+    }
+}
+```
+
 This error usually happens when trying to pass in a value to an input inline
 assembly operand that is actually a pair of values. In particular, this can
 happen when trying to pass in a slice, for instance a `&str`. In Rust, these

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0698.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ generator can be constructed.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
-```edition2018,compile-fail,E0698
+```edition2018,compile_fail,E0698
 async fn bar<T>() -> () {}
 
 async fn foo() {

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0700.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ appear within the `impl Trait` itself.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
-```compile-fail,E0700
+```compile_fail,E0700
 use std::cell::Cell;
 
 trait Trait<'a> { }

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0708.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
-```compile_fail,edition2018
+```compile_fail,edition2018,E0708
 #![feature(async_closure)]
 
 fn main() {

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0714.md

@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
 A `#[marker]` trait contained an associated item.
 
+Erroneous code example:
+
+```compile_fail,E0714
+#![feature(marker_trait_attr)]
+#![feature(associated_type_defaults)]
+
+#[marker]
+trait MarkerConst {
+    const N: usize; // error!
+}
+
+fn main() {}
+```
+
 The items of marker traits cannot be overridden, so there's no need to have them
 when they cannot be changed per-type anyway.  If you wanted them for ergonomic
 reasons, consider making an extension trait instead.

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0715.md

@@ -1,5 +1,24 @@
 An `impl` for a `#[marker]` trait tried to override an associated item.
 
+Erroneous code example:
+
+```compile_fail,E0715
+#![feature(marker_trait_attr)]
+
+#[marker]
+trait Marker {
+    const N: usize = 0;
+    fn do_something() {}
+}
+
+struct OverrideConst;
+impl Marker for OverrideConst { // error!
+    const N: usize = 1;
+}
+
+fn main() {}
+```
+
 Because marker traits are allowed to have multiple implementations for the same
 type, it's not allowed to override anything in those implementations, as it
 would be ambiguous which override should actually be used.

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0727.md

@@ -2,14 +2,16 @@ A `yield` clause was used in an `async` context.
 
 Example of erroneous code:
 
-```compile_fail
+```compile_fail,E0727,edition2018
 #![feature(generators)]
 
-let generator = || {
+fn main() {
+    let generator = || {
         async {
             yield;
         }
-};
+    };
+}
 ```
 
 Here, the `yield` keyword is used in an `async` block,
@@ -17,10 +19,12 @@ which is not yet supported.
 
 To fix this error, you have to move `yield` out of the `async` block:
 
-```
+```edition2018
 #![feature(generators)]
 
-let generator = || {
+fn main() {
+    let generator = || {
         yield;
-};
+    };
+}
 ```

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0732.md

@@ -1,5 +1,18 @@
 An `enum` with a discriminant must specify a `#[repr(inttype)]`.
 
+Erroneous code example:
+
+```compile_fail,E0732
+#![feature(arbitrary_enum_discriminant)]
+
+enum Enum { // error!
+    Unit = 1,
+    Tuple() = 2,
+    Struct{} = 3,
+}
+# fn main() {}
+```
+
 A `#[repr(inttype)]` must be provided on an `enum` if it has a non-unit
 variant with a discriminant, or where there are both unit variants with
 discriminants and non-unit variants. This restriction ensures that there
@@ -23,7 +36,9 @@ fn discriminant(v : &Enum) -> u8 {
     unsafe { *(v as *const Enum as *const u8) }
 }
 
-assert_eq!(3, discriminant(&Enum::Unit));
-assert_eq!(2, discriminant(&Enum::Tuple(5)));
-assert_eq!(1, discriminant(&Enum::Struct{a: 7, b: 11}));
+fn main() {
+    assert_eq!(3, discriminant(&Enum::Unit));
+    assert_eq!(2, discriminant(&Enum::Tuple(5)));
+    assert_eq!(1, discriminant(&Enum::Struct{a: 7, b: 11}));
+}
 ```

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0740.md

@@ -1 +1,16 @@
 A `union` cannot have fields with destructors.
+
+Erroneous code example:
+
+```compile_fail,E0740
+union Test {
+    a: A, // error!
+}
+
+#[derive(Debug)]
+struct A(i32);
+
+impl Drop for A {
+    fn drop(&mut self) { println!("A"); }
+}
+```

src/librustc_error_codes/error_codes/E0744.md

@@ -3,16 +3,13 @@ Control-flow expressions are not allowed inside a const context.
 At the moment, `if` and `match`, as well as the looping constructs `for`,
 `while`, and `loop`, are forbidden inside a `const`, `static`, or `const fn`.
 
-```compile_fail,E0658
+```compile_fail,E0744
 const _: i32 = {
     let mut x = 0;
-    loop {
-        x += 1;
-        if x == 4 {
-            break;
+
+    for i in 0..4 { // error!
+        x += i;
     }
-    }
-    x
 };
 ```
 

src/tools/tidy/src/error_codes_check.rs

@@ -15,21 +15,57 @@ const WHITELIST: &[&str] = &[
     "E0727", "E0729",
 ];
 
+// Some error codes don't have any tests apparently...
+const IGNORE_EXPLANATION_CHECK: &[&str] =
+    &["E0570", "E0601", "E0602", "E0639", "E0729", "E0749", "E0750", "E0751"];
+
 fn check_error_code_explanation(
     f: &str,
     error_codes: &mut HashMap<String, bool>,
     err_code: String,
-) {
+) -> bool {
+    let mut invalid_compile_fail_format = false;
+    let mut found_error_code = false;
+
     for line in f.lines() {
         let s = line.trim();
-        if s.starts_with("```") && s.contains("compile_fail") && s.contains('E') {
-            error_codes.insert(err_code, true);
-            return;
+        if s.starts_with("```") {
+            if s.contains("compile_fail") && s.contains('E') {
+                if !found_error_code {
+                    error_codes.insert(err_code.clone(), true);
+                    found_error_code = true;
+                }
+            } else if s.contains("compile-fail") {
+                invalid_compile_fail_format = true;
+            }
         } else if s.starts_with("#### Note: this error code is no longer emitted by the compiler") {
+            if !found_error_code {
                 error_codes.get_mut(&err_code).map(|x| *x = true);
-            return;
+                found_error_code = true;
             }
         }
+    }
+    invalid_compile_fail_format
+}
+
+fn check_if_error_code_is_test_in_explanation(f: &str, err_code: &String) -> bool {
+    let mut can_be_ignored = false;
+
+    for line in f.lines() {
+        let s = line.trim();
+        if s.starts_with("#### Note: this error code is no longer emitted by the compiler") {
+            return true;
+        }
+        if s.starts_with("```") {
+            if s.contains("compile_fail") && s.contains(err_code) {
+                return true;
+            } else if s.contains("(") {
+                // It's very likely that we can't actually make it fail compilation...
+                can_be_ignored = true;
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    can_be_ignored
 }
 
 macro_rules! some_or_continue {
@@ -41,7 +77,12 @@ macro_rules! some_or_continue {
     };
 }
 
-fn extract_error_codes(f: &str, error_codes: &mut HashMap<String, bool>, path: &Path) {
+fn extract_error_codes(
+    f: &str,
+    error_codes: &mut HashMap<String, bool>,
+    path: &Path,
+    errors: &mut Vec<String>,
+) {
     let mut reached_no_explanation = false;
 
     for line in f.lines() {
@@ -55,10 +96,26 @@ fn extract_error_codes(f: &str, error_codes: &mut HashMap<String, bool>, path: &
                 // Now we extract the tests from the markdown file!
                 let md = some_or_continue!(s.splitn(2, "include_str!(\"").nth(1));
                 let md_file_name = some_or_continue!(md.splitn(2, "\")").next());
-                let path = some_or_continue!(path.parent()).join(md_file_name);
+                let path = some_or_continue!(path.parent())
+                    .join(md_file_name)
+                    .canonicalize()
+                    .expect("failed to canonicalize error explanation file path");
                 match read_to_string(&path) {
                     Ok(content) => {
-                        check_error_code_explanation(&content, error_codes, err_code);
+                        if !IGNORE_EXPLANATION_CHECK.contains(&err_code.as_str())
+                            && !check_if_error_code_is_test_in_explanation(&content, &err_code)
+                        {
+                            errors.push(format!(
+                                "`{}` doesn't use its own error code in compile_fail example",
+                                path.display(),
+                            ));
+                        }
+                        if check_error_code_explanation(&content, error_codes, err_code) {
+                            errors.push(format!(
+                                "`{}` uses invalid tag `compile-fail` instead of `compile_fail`",
+                                path.display(),
+                            ));
+                        }
                     }
                     Err(e) => {
                         eprintln!("Couldn't read `{}`: {}", path.display(), e);
@@ -94,24 +151,26 @@ fn extract_error_codes_from_tests(f: &str, error_codes: &mut HashMap<String, boo
 }
 
 pub fn check(path: &Path, bad: &mut bool) {
+    let mut errors = Vec::new();
     println!("Checking which error codes lack tests...");
     let mut error_codes: HashMap<String, bool> = HashMap::new();
     super::walk(path, &mut |path| super::filter_dirs(path), &mut |entry, contents| {
         let file_name = entry.file_name();
         if file_name == "error_codes.rs" {
-            extract_error_codes(contents, &mut error_codes, entry.path());
+            extract_error_codes(contents, &mut error_codes, entry.path(), &mut errors);
         } else if entry.path().extension() == Some(OsStr::new("stderr")) {
             extract_error_codes_from_tests(contents, &mut error_codes);
         }
     });
+    if errors.is_empty() {
         println!("Found {} error codes", error_codes.len());
 
-    let mut errors = Vec::new();
         for (err_code, nb) in &error_codes {
             if !*nb && !WHITELIST.contains(&err_code.as_str()) {
                 errors.push(format!("Error code {} needs to have at least one UI test!", err_code));
             }
         }
+    }
     errors.sort();
     for err in &errors {
         eprintln!("{}", err);