OpenE2K/rust
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rollup merge of #28485 - Wallacoloo:clarify-let-lhs, r=alexcrichton

Browse Source 
In code like `let x = 5`, I am initially confused as to the meaning of "let doesn't take a name on the left hand side, it actually accepts a pattern." - I interpret that as the pattern being located as: `<pattern> let [...]`.

I think what is meant is that the name/pattern is on the left hand side *of the assignment*, rather than to the left of the *let* statement. This change clarifies that.
This commit is contained in:
Steve Klabnik 2015-09-19 11:15:48 -04:00
commit d557f4a60f
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/doc/trpl/guessing-game.md
View File

@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ a few tricks up their sleeves.
For example, they’re [immutable][immutable] by default. That’s why our example
uses `mut`: it makes a binding mutable, rather than immutable. `let` doesn’t
take a name on the left hand side, it actually accepts a
take a name on the left hand side of the assignment, it actually accepts a
‘[pattern][patterns]’. We’ll use patterns later. It’s easy enough
to use for now: