OpenE2K/rust
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Explain that lack of short circuiting support in constants is temporary

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Oliver Scherer 2018-12-18 09:42:46 +01:00
parent b678238070
commit d815e2b870
2 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
src/librustc_mir/transform/qualify_consts.rs
View File

@ -1348,7 +1348,10 @@ impl MirPass for QualifyAndPromoteConstants {
for (span, kind) in mir.control_flow_destroyed.iter() {
error.span_note(
*span,
&format!("use of {} here", kind),
&format!("use of {} here does not actually short circuit due to \
the const evaluator presently not being able to do control flow. \
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49146 for more \
information.", kind),
);
}
for local in locals {

4
src/test/ui/consts/const_short_circuit.stderr
View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ error: new features like let bindings are not permitted in constants which also
LL | let mut x = true && false;
| ^^^^^
|
note: use of `&&` operator here
note: use of `&&` operator here does not actually short circuit due to the const evaluator presently not being able to do control flow. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49146 for more information.
--> $DIR/const_short_circuit.rs:6:22
|
LL | let mut x = true && false;
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ error: new features like let bindings are not permitted in constants which also
LL | let x = true && false;
| ^
|
note: use of `&&` operator here
note: use of `&&` operator here does not actually short circuit due to the const evaluator presently not being able to do control flow. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49146 for more information.
--> $DIR/const_short_circuit.rs:11:18
|
LL | let x = true && false;