Guide: explains the enum/match relationship

Closes #18169
This commit is contained in:
gamazeps 2014-10-31 21:31:27 +01:00
parent 5e834243b6
commit dc7c8da74b

View File

@ -1124,21 +1124,6 @@ enum OptionalInt {
Value(int), Value(int),
Missing, Missing,
} }
fn main() {
let x = Value(5);
let y = Missing;
match x {
Value(n) => println!("x is {}", n),
Missing => println!("x is missing!"),
}
match y {
Value(n) => println!("y is {}", n),
Missing => println!("y is missing!"),
}
}
``` ```
This enum represents an `int` that we may or may not have. In the `Missing` This enum represents an `int` that we may or may not have. In the `Missing`
@ -1146,7 +1131,7 @@ case, we have no value, but in the `Value` case, we do. This enum is specific
to `int`s, though. We can make it usable by any type, but we haven't quite to `int`s, though. We can make it usable by any type, but we haven't quite
gotten there yet! gotten there yet!
You can have any number of values in an enum: You can also have any number of values in an enum:
```{rust} ```{rust}
enum OptionalColor { enum OptionalColor {
@ -1155,10 +1140,23 @@ enum OptionalColor {
} }
``` ```
Enums with values are quite useful, but as I mentioned, they're even more And you can also have something like this:
useful when they're generic across types. But before we get to generics, let's
talk about how to fix these big `if`/`else` statements we've been writing. We'll ```{rust}
do that with `match`. enum StringResult {
StringOK(String),
ErrorReason(String),
}
```
Where a `StringResult` is either an `StringOK`, with the result of a computation, or an
`ErrorReason` with a `String` explaining what caused the computation to fail. This kind of
`enum`s are actually very useful and are even part of the standard library.
As you can see `enum`s with values are quite a powerful tool for data representation,
and can be even more useful when they're generic across types. But before we get to
generics, let's talk about how to use them with pattern matching, a tool that will
let us deconstruct this sum type (the type theory term for enums) in a very elegant
way and avoid all these messy `if`/`else`s.
# Match # Match
@ -1188,7 +1186,7 @@ expression will be evaluated. It's called `match` because of the term 'pattern
matching,' which `match` is an implementation of. matching,' which `match` is an implementation of.
So what's the big advantage here? Well, there are a few. First of all, `match` So what's the big advantage here? Well, there are a few. First of all, `match`
does 'exhaustiveness checking.' Do you see that last arm, the one with the enforces 'exhaustiveness checking.' Do you see that last arm, the one with the
underscore (`_`)? If we remove that arm, Rust will give us an error: underscore (`_`)? If we remove that arm, Rust will give us an error:
```{ignore,notrust} ```{ignore,notrust}
@ -1255,6 +1253,37 @@ version, if we had forgotten the `Greater` case, for example, our program would
have happily compiled. If we forget in the `match`, it will not. Rust helps us have happily compiled. If we forget in the `match`, it will not. Rust helps us
make sure to cover all of our bases. make sure to cover all of our bases.
`match` expressions also allow us to get the values contained in an `enum`
(also known as destructuring) as follows:
```{rust}
enum OptionalInt {
Value(int),
Missing,
}
fn main() {
let x = Value(5);
let y = Missing;
match x {
Value(n) => println!("x is {}", n),
Missing => println!("x is missing!"),
}
match y {
Value(n) => println!("y is {}", n),
Missing => println!("y is missing!"),
}
}
```
That is how you can get and use the values contained in `enum`s.
It can also allow us to treat errors or unexpected computations, for example, a
function that is not guaranteed to be able to compute a result (an `int` here),
could return an `OptionalInt`, and we would handle that value with a `match`.
As you can see, `enum` and `match` used together are quite useful!
`match` is also an expression, which means we can use it on the right `match` is also an expression, which means we can use it on the right
hand side of a `let` binding or directly where an expression is hand side of a `let` binding or directly where an expression is
used. We could also implement the previous line like this: used. We could also implement the previous line like this: