Use a boundary method instead of an endpoint method for split_grouped_constructors

This commit is contained in:
varkor 2018-08-21 23:27:45 +01:00
parent 6a957e172a
commit dec55631d9
2 changed files with 54 additions and 84 deletions

View File

@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ use std::cmp::{self, Ordering, min, max};
use std::fmt;
use std::iter::{FromIterator, IntoIterator};
use std::ops::RangeInclusive;
use std::u128;
pub fn expand_pattern<'a, 'tcx>(cx: &MatchCheckCtxt<'a, 'tcx>, pat: Pattern<'tcx>)
-> &'a Pattern<'tcx>
@ -799,6 +800,7 @@ fn max_slice_length<'p, 'a: 'p, 'tcx: 'a, I>(
///
/// `IntRange` is never used to encode an empty range or a "range" that wraps
/// around the (offset) space: i.e. `range.lo <= range.hi`.
#[derive(Clone)]
struct IntRange<'tcx> {
pub range: RangeInclusive<u128>,
pub ty: Ty<'tcx>,
@ -1400,9 +1402,7 @@ fn should_treat_range_exhaustively(tcx: TyCtxt<'_, 'tcx, 'tcx>, ctor: &Construct
/// patterns that apply to that range (specifically: the patterns that *intersect* with that range)
/// change.
/// Our solution, therefore, is to split the range constructor into subranges at every single point
/// the group of intersecting patterns changes, which we can compute by converting each pattern to
/// a range and recording its endpoints, then creating subranges between each consecutive pair of
/// endpoints.
/// the group of intersecting patterns changes (using the method described below).
/// And voilà! We're testing precisely those ranges that we need to, without any exhaustive matching
/// on actual integers. The nice thing about this is that the number of subranges is linear in the
/// number of rows in the matrix (i.e. the number of cases in the `match` statement), so we don't
@ -1414,14 +1414,14 @@ fn should_treat_range_exhaustively(tcx: TyCtxt<'_, 'tcx, 'tcx>, ctor: &Construct
/// |-------| |-------| |----| ||
/// |---------|
///
/// We truncate the ranges so that they lie inside each range constructor and then split them
/// up into equivalence classes so the ranges are no longer overlapping:
/// We split the ranges up into equivalence classes so the ranges are no longer overlapping:
///
/// |--|--|||-||||--||---|||-------| |-|||| ||
///
/// The logic for determining how to split the ranges is a little involved: we need to make sure
/// that we have a new range for each subrange for which a different set of rows coïncides, but
/// essentially reduces to case analysis on the endpoints of the ranges.
/// The logic for determining how to split the ranges is fairly straightforward: we calculate
/// boundaries for each interval range, sort them, then create constructors for each new interval
/// between every pair of boundary points. (This essentially sums up to performing the intuitive
/// merging operation depicted above.)
fn split_grouped_constructors<'p, 'a: 'p, 'tcx: 'a>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'tcx>,
ctors: Vec<Constructor<'tcx>>,
@ -1440,84 +1440,54 @@ fn split_grouped_constructors<'p, 'a: 'p, 'tcx: 'a>(
// `NotUseful`, which is the default case anyway, and can be ignored.
let ctor_range = IntRange::from_ctor(tcx, &ctor).unwrap();
// We're going to collect all the endpoints in the new pattern so we can create
// subranges between them.
// If there's a single point, we need to identify it as belonging
// to a length-1 range, so it can be treated as an individual
// constructor, rather than as an endpoint. To do this, we keep track of which
// endpoint a point corresponds to. Whenever a point corresponds to both a start
// and an end, then we create a unit range for it.
#[derive(PartialEq, Clone, Copy, Debug)]
enum Endpoint {
Start,
End,
Both,
};
let mut points = FxHashMap::default();
let add_endpoint = |points: &mut FxHashMap<_, _>, x, endpoint| {
points.entry(x).and_modify(|ex_x| {
if *ex_x != endpoint {
*ex_x = Endpoint::Both
}
}).or_insert(endpoint);
};
let add_endpoints = |points: &mut FxHashMap<_, _>, lo, hi| {
// Insert the endpoints, taking care to keep track of to
// which endpoints a point corresponds.
add_endpoint(points, lo, Endpoint::Start);
add_endpoint(points, hi, Endpoint::End);
};
let (lo, hi) = (*ctor_range.range.start(), *ctor_range.range.end());
add_endpoints(&mut points, lo, hi);
// We're going to iterate through every row pattern, adding endpoints in.
for row in m.iter() {
if let Some(r) = IntRange::from_pat(tcx, row[0]) {
// We're only interested in endpoints that lie (at least partially)
// within the subrange domain.
if let Some(r) = ctor_range.intersection(&r) {
let (r_lo, r_hi) = r.range.into_inner();
add_endpoints(&mut points, r_lo, r_hi);
}
}
/// Represents a border between 2 integers. Because the intervals spanning borders
/// must be able to cover every integer, we need 2^128 + 1 such borders.
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
enum Border {
JustBefore(u128),
AfterMax,
}
// The patterns were iterated in an arbitrary order (i.e. in the order the user
// wrote them), so we need to make sure our endpoints are sorted.
let mut points: Vec<(u128, Endpoint)> = points.into_iter().collect();
points.sort_unstable_by_key(|(x, _)| *x);
let mut points = points.into_iter();
let mut a = points.next().unwrap();
// Iterate through pairs of points, adding the subranges to `split_ctors`.
// We have to be careful about the orientation of the points as endpoints, to make
// sure we're enumerating precisely the correct ranges. Too few and the matching is
// actually incorrect. Too many and our diagnostics are poorer. This involves some
// case analysis.
// In essence, we need to ensure that every time the set of row-ranges that are
// overlapping changes (as we go through the values covered by the ranges), we split
// into a new subrange.
while let Some(b) = points.next() {
// a < b (strictly)
if let Endpoint::Both = a.1 {
split_ctors.push(IntRange::range_to_ctor(tcx, ty, a.0..=a.0));
}
// Integer overflow cannot occur here, because only the first point may be
// u128::MIN and only the last may be u128::MAX.
let c = match a.1 {
Endpoint::Start => a.0,
Endpoint::End | Endpoint::Both => a.0 + 1,
// A function for extracting the borders of an integer interval.
fn range_borders(r: IntRange<'_>) -> impl Iterator<Item = Border> {
let (lo, hi) = r.range.into_inner();
let from = Border::JustBefore(lo);
let to = match hi.checked_add(1) {
Some(m) => Border::JustBefore(m),
None => Border::AfterMax,
};
let d = match b.1 {
Endpoint::Start | Endpoint::Both => b.0 - 1,
Endpoint::End => b.0,
};
// In some cases, we won't need an intermediate range between two ranges
// lie immediately adjacent to one another.
if c <= d {
split_ctors.push(IntRange::range_to_ctor(tcx, ty, c..=d));
vec![from, to].into_iter()
}
a = b;
// `borders` is the set of borders between equivalence classes: each equivalence
// class lies between 2 borders.
let row_borders = m.iter()
.flat_map(|row| IntRange::from_pat(tcx, row[0]))
.flat_map(|range| ctor_range.intersection(&range))
.flat_map(|range| range_borders(range));
let ctor_borders = range_borders(ctor_range.clone());
let mut borders: Vec<_> = row_borders.chain(ctor_borders).collect();
borders.sort_unstable();
// We're going to iterate through every pair of borders, making sure that each
// represents an interval of nonnegative length, and convert each such interval
// into a constructor.
for IntRange { range, .. } in borders.windows(2).filter_map(|window| {
match (window[0], window[1]) {
(Border::JustBefore(n), Border::JustBefore(m)) => {
if n < m {
Some(IntRange { range: n..=(m - 1), ty })
} else {
None
}
}
(Border::JustBefore(n), Border::AfterMax) => {
Some(IntRange { range: n..=u128::MAX, ty })
}
(Border::AfterMax, _) => None,
}
}) {
split_ctors.push(IntRange::range_to_ctor(tcx, ty, range));
}
}
// Any other constructor can be used unchanged.

View File

@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ fn main() {
_ => {}
}
const lim: u128 = u128::MAX - 1;
const LIM: u128 = u128::MAX - 1;
match 0u128 { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns
0 ..= lim => {}
0 ..= LIM => {}
}
}