OpenE2K/rust
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove now dead code.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Felix S. Klock II 2017-09-22 15:37:43 +02:00
parent d9d10c1628
commit e319f4093c
1 changed files with 1 additions and 299 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

300
src/librustc_mir/borrow_check.rs
View File

@ -544,19 +544,6 @@ impl<'c, 'b, 'a: 'b+'c, 'gcx, 'tcx: 'a> MirBorrowckCtxt<'c, 'b, 'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>
}
}
}
#[cfg(not_anymore)]
fn borrow(&mut self,
context: Context,
location: Location,
bk: BorrowKind,
lvalue_span: (&Lvalue<'gcx>, Span),
flow_state: &InProgress<'b, 'gcx>) {
debug!("borrow location: {:?} lvalue: {:?} span: {:?}",
location, lvalue_span.0, lvalue_span.1);
self.check_if_path_is_moved(context, lvalue_span, flow_state);
self.check_for_conflicting_loans(context, location, bk, lvalue_span, flow_state);
}
}
impl<'c, 'b, 'a: 'b+'c, 'gcx, 'tcx: 'a> MirBorrowckCtxt<'c, 'b, 'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
@ -697,64 +684,7 @@ impl<'c, 'b, 'a: 'b+'c, 'gcx, 'tcx: 'a> MirBorrowckCtxt<'c, 'b, 'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>
}
}
}
#[cfg(not_anymore)]
fn check_for_conflicting_loans(&mut self,
context: Context,
_location: Location,
_bk: BorrowKind,
lvalue_span: (&Lvalue<'gcx>, Span),
flow_state: &InProgress<'b, 'gcx>) {
// NOTE FIXME: The analogous code in old borrowck
// check_loans.rs is careful to iterate over every *issued*
// loan, as opposed to just the in scope ones.
//
// (Or if you prefer, all the *other* iterations over loans
// only consider loans that are in scope of some given
// region::Scope)
//
// The (currently skeletal) code here does not encode such a
// distinction, which means it is almost certainly over
// looking something.
//
// (It is probably going to reject code that should be
// accepted, I suspect, by treated issued-but-out-of-scope
// loans as issued-and-in-scope, and thus causing them to
// interfere with other loans.)
//
// However, I just want to get something running, especially
// since I am trying to move into new territory with NLL, so
// lets get this going first, and then address the issued vs
// in-scope distinction later.
let state = &flow_state.borrows;
let data = &state.base_results.operator().borrows();
debug!("check_for_conflicting_loans location: {:?}", _location);
// does any loan generated here conflict with a previously issued loan?
let mut loans_generated = 0;
for (g, gen) in state.elems_generated().map(|g| (g, &data[g])) {
loans_generated += 1;
for (i, issued) in state.elems_incoming().map(|i| (i, &data[i])) {
debug!("check_for_conflicting_loans gen: {:?} issued: {:?} conflicts: {}",
(g, gen, self.base_path(&gen.lvalue),
self.restrictions(&gen.lvalue).collect::<Vec<_>>()),
(i, issued, self.base_path(&issued.lvalue),
self.restrictions(&issued.lvalue).collect::<Vec<_>>()),
self.conflicts_with(gen, issued));
if self.conflicts_with(gen, issued) {
self.report_conflicting_borrow(context, lvalue_span, gen, issued);
}
}
}
// MIR statically ensures each statement gens *at most one*
// loan; mutual conflict (within a statement) can't arise.
//
// As safe-guard, assert that above property actually holds.
assert!(loans_generated <= 1);
} }
}
impl<'c, 'b, 'a: 'b+'c, 'gcx, 'tcx: 'a> MirBorrowckCtxt<'c, 'b, 'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
fn each_borrow_involving_path<F>(&mut self,
@ -954,194 +884,6 @@ mod prefixes {
}
}
}
}
#[cfg(not_anymore)]
mod restrictions {
use super::MirBorrowckCtxt;
use rustc::hir;
use rustc::ty::{self, TyCtxt};
use rustc::mir::{Lvalue, Mir, ProjectionElem};
pub(super) struct Restrictions<'c, 'tcx: 'c> {
mir: &'c Mir<'tcx>,
tcx: TyCtxt<'c, 'tcx, 'tcx>,
lvalue_stack: Vec<&'c Lvalue<'tcx>>,
}
impl<'c, 'b, 'a: 'b+'c, 'gcx, 'tcx: 'a> MirBorrowckCtxt<'c, 'b, 'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
pub(super) fn restrictions<'d>(&self,
lvalue: &'d Lvalue<'gcx>)
-> Restrictions<'d, 'gcx> where 'b: 'd
{
let lvalue_stack = if self.has_restrictions(lvalue) { vec![lvalue] } else { vec![] };
Restrictions { lvalue_stack, mir: self.mir, tcx: self.tcx }
}
fn has_restrictions(&self, lvalue: &Lvalue<'gcx>) -> bool {
let mut cursor = lvalue;
loop {
let proj = match *cursor {
Lvalue::Local(_) => return true,
Lvalue::Static(_) => return false,
Lvalue::Projection(ref proj) => proj,
};
match proj.elem {
ProjectionElem::Index(..) |
ProjectionElem::ConstantIndex { .. } |
ProjectionElem::Downcast(..) |
ProjectionElem::Subslice { .. } |
ProjectionElem::Field(_/*field*/, _/*ty*/) => {
cursor = &proj.base;
continue;
}
ProjectionElem::Deref => {
let ty = proj.base.ty(self.mir, self.tcx).to_ty(self.tcx);
match ty.sty {
ty::TyRawPtr(_) => {
return false;
}
ty::TyRef(_, ty::TypeAndMut { ty: _, mutbl: hir::MutImmutable }) => {
// FIXME: do I need to check validity of
// region here though? (I think the original
// check_loans code did, like readme says)
return false;
}
ty::TyRef(_, ty::TypeAndMut { ty: _, mutbl: hir::MutMutable }) => {
cursor = &proj.base;
continue;
}
ty::TyAdt(..) if ty.is_box() => {
cursor = &proj.base;
continue;
}
_ => {
panic!("unknown type fed to Projection Deref.");
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
impl<'c, 'tcx> Iterator for Restrictions<'c, 'tcx> {
type Item = &'c Lvalue<'tcx>;
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
'pop: loop {
let lvalue = match self.lvalue_stack.pop() {
None => return None,
Some(lvalue) => lvalue,
};
// `lvalue` may not be a restriction itself, but may
// hold one further down (e.g. we never return
// downcasts here, but may return a base of a
// downcast).
//
// Also, we need to enqueue any additional
// subrestrictions that it implies, since we can only
// return from from this call alone.
let mut cursor = lvalue;
'cursor: loop {
let proj = match *cursor {
Lvalue::Local(_) => return Some(cursor), // search yielded this leaf
Lvalue::Static(_) => continue 'pop, // fruitless leaf; try next on stack
Lvalue::Projection(ref proj) => proj,
};
match proj.elem {
ProjectionElem::Field(_/*field*/, _/*ty*/) => {
// FIXME: add union handling
self.lvalue_stack.push(&proj.base);
return Some(cursor);
}
ProjectionElem::Downcast(..) |
ProjectionElem::Subslice { .. } |
ProjectionElem::ConstantIndex { .. } |
ProjectionElem::Index(_) => {
cursor = &proj.base;
continue 'cursor;
}
ProjectionElem::Deref => {
// (handled below)
}
}
assert_eq!(proj.elem, ProjectionElem::Deref);
let ty = proj.base.ty(self.mir, self.tcx).to_ty(self.tcx);
match ty.sty {
ty::TyRawPtr(_) => {
// borrowck ignores raw ptrs; treat analogous to imm borrow
continue 'pop;
}
// R-Deref-Imm-Borrowed
ty::TyRef(_/*rgn*/, ty::TypeAndMut { ty: _, mutbl: hir::MutImmutable }) => {
// immutably-borrowed referents do not
// have recursively-implied restrictions
// (because preventing actions on `*LV`
// does nothing about aliases like `*LV1`)
// FIXME: do I need to check validity of
// `_r` here though? (I think the original
// check_loans code did, like the readme
// says)
// (And do I *really* not have to
// recursively process the `base` as a
// further search here? Leaving this `if
// false` here as a hint to look at this
// again later.
//
// Ah, it might be because the
// restrictions are distinct from the path
// substructure. Note that there is a
// separate loop over the path
// substructure in fn
// each_borrow_involving_path, for better
// or for worse.
if false {
cursor = &proj.base;
continue 'cursor;
} else {
continue 'pop;
}
}
// R-Deref-Mut-Borrowed
ty::TyRef(_/*rgn*/, ty::TypeAndMut { ty: _, mutbl: hir::MutMutable }) => {
// mutably-borrowed referents are
// themselves restricted.
// FIXME: do I need to check validity of
// `_r` here though? (I think the original
// check_loans code did, like the readme
// says)
// schedule base for future iteration.
self.lvalue_stack.push(&proj.base);
return Some(cursor); // search yielded interior node
}
// R-Deref-Send-Pointer
ty::TyAdt(..) if ty.is_box() => {
// borrowing interior of a box implies that
// its base can no longer be mutated (o/w box
// storage would be freed)
self.lvalue_stack.push(&proj.base);
return Some(cursor); // search yielded interior node
}
_ => panic!("unknown type fed to Projection Deref."),
}
}
}
}
}
}
impl<'c, 'b, 'a: 'b+'c, 'gcx, 'tcx: 'a> MirBorrowckCtxt<'c, 'b, 'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
@ -1319,26 +1061,6 @@ impl<'c, 'b, 'a: 'b+'c, 'gcx, 'tcx: 'a> MirBorrowckCtxt<'c, 'b, 'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>
}
impl<'c, 'b, 'a: 'b+'c, 'gcx, 'tcx: 'a> MirBorrowckCtxt<'c, 'b, 'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
// FIXME: needs to be able to express errors analogous to check_loans.rs
#[cfg(not_anymore)]
fn conflicts_with(&self, loan1: &BorrowData<'gcx>, loan2: &BorrowData<'gcx>) -> bool {
if loan1.compatible_with(loan2.kind) { return false; }
let loan2_base_path = self.base_path(&loan2.lvalue);
for restricted in self.restrictions(&loan1.lvalue) {
if restricted != loan2_base_path { continue; }
return true;
}
let loan1_base_path = self.base_path(&loan1.lvalue);
for restricted in self.restrictions(&loan2.lvalue) {
if restricted != loan1_base_path { continue; }
return true;
}
return false;
}
// FIXME (#16118): function intended to allow the borrow checker
// to be less precise in its handling of Box while still allowing
// moves out of a Box. They should be removed when/if we stop
@ -1518,28 +1240,8 @@ impl<BD> FlowInProgress<BD> where BD: BitDenotation {
self.curr_state.subtract(&self.stmt_kill);
}
#[allow(dead_code)]
fn elems_generated(&self) -> indexed_set::Elems<BD::Idx> {
let univ = self.base_results.sets().bits_per_block();
self.stmt_gen.elems(univ)
}
fn elems_incoming(&self) -> indexed_set::Elems<BD::Idx> {
let univ = self.base_results.sets().bits_per_block();
self.curr_state.elems(univ)
}
}
impl<'tcx> BorrowData<'tcx> {
#[allow(dead_code)]
fn compatible_with(&self, bk: BorrowKind) -> bool {
match (self.kind, bk) {
(BorrowKind::Shared, BorrowKind::Shared) => true,
(BorrowKind::Mut, _) |
(BorrowKind::Unique, _) |
(_, BorrowKind::Mut) |
(_, BorrowKind::Unique) => false,
}
}
}